Twitter headlines
« Biotech Boost to Ethanol Production | Main | A Boost for Thermoelectrics »
Corrections: Average Fuel Consumption in Europe Half 47% Better Than US
7 November 2004
A study completed earlier this year by the French environment and energy agency Ademe and the World Energy Council indicates that over
nearly 30 years, the average fuel consumption of European cars has
dropped by more than 20% to around 6.5 l/100km, or 43 mpg. By contrast, average fuel economy of new cars in the US is now 21 29.3 mpg. (See update below.)
France itself appears to be the European fuel economy leader, with the average consumption of new cars on sale in France now at 46 mpg.
Contributing factors are the ongoing shift to diesel, the improved efficiency of the vehicles, public policies maintaining high fuel prices to discourage consumption, and a strong focus on public transportation.
Update: I may have been too hasty with my earlier calculations. If the Ademe figures refer just to cars (as John asks below...and which I'm trying to confirm one way or the other), then the picture is slightly different.
According to The National Highway Safety Traffic Safety Administration, while the CAFE standard for 2004 passenger cars was 27.5 mpg, the actual composition of the models in the US passenger car fleet yielded an average 29.3 mpg. The average fuel economy of the entire 2004 model year fleet (cars and light duty trucks and SUVs) was 24.7 mpg.
Using that as a baseline, then the fuel economy of the average US new car is 32% worse than that of Europe. Or, to put it the other way, European passenger car fuel economy is 47% better than that of the US.
November 7, 2004 in Fuel Efficiency | Permalink | Comments (9) | TrackBack (8)
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00d83421255e53ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Corrections: Average Fuel Consumption in Europe Half 47% Better Than US:
» Dove sta la differenza from Network Games
Tra un motore Usa e uno europeo... [Read More]
» Back from Europe... from No Truth Allowed
[Read More]
» Back from Europe... from No Truth Allowed
[Read More]
» Take Your SUV and Shove It from Starting a Landslide in My Ego
Many of you will hate me for saying this, but I cant help taking a sort of sick pleasure in watching people squirm about gas prices.
Yes, its easier for my car-less ass to sit here on my high horse and sneer, but I really feel no compas... [Read More]
» Carpooling en España, ¿foneamos los coches? from Martin Varsavsky | Español
El consumo de gasolina de los coches europeos es 47% mejor que el de los coches norteamericanos. En este sentido Europa supera ampliamente a Estados Unidos. Pero hay un tema que noto cada vez que voy a Silicon Valley y... [Read More]
» Carpooling en España, ¿foneamos los coches? from Martin Varsavsky | Español
El consumo de gasolina de los coches europeos es 47% mejor que el de los coches norteamericanos. En este sentido Europa supera ampliamente a Estados Unidos. Pero hay un tema que noto cada vez que voy a Silicon Valley y... [Read More]
» Carpooling en España, ¿foneamos los coches? from Martin Varsavsky | Español
El consumo de gasolina de los coches europeos es 47% mejor que el de los coches norteamericanos. En este sentido Europa supera ampliamente a Estados Unidos. Pero hay un tema que noto cada vez que voy a Silicon Valley y... [Read More]
» Carpooling en España, ¿foneamos los coches? from Martin Varsavsky | Español
El consumo de gasolina de los coches europeos es 47% mejor que el de los coches norteamericanos. En este sentido Europa supera ampliamente a Estados Unidos.... [Read More]
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Sounds like this is just cars? Or does it include SUV's (sadly making inroads here in Europe)?
-- John
Posted by: John Norris | November 07, 2004 at 11:50 AM
Hmm, I read it as being the light duty fleet, but now that you raise the question, I’m not absolutely sure. I’ll try to get an answer, and in the meantime, I’ll modify the post above.
Posted by: Mike | November 07, 2004 at 01:06 PM
The study above does factor in the entire composition of the fleet—on a weighted basis to “car-equivalents.” From the World Energy Council:
Posted by: Mike | November 08, 2004 at 07:17 AM
Are you sure both the US and European figures are using the same kind of gallons? I'm suspicious that the American MPG figure is in American gallons and the European MPG figure is in Imperial (English) gallons. That would give a 20% advantage to the European figures. I mean, surely your cars can't be that crappy?
1 Imperial (English) gallon = 1.2 US gallons
(Gallons are not used in England anymore, we use litres; gallons are a remnant of the Imperial/colonial age. Can't imagine why you call them "English". We haven't used gallons since the 1960s.)
Posted by: Andrew Oakley | September 18, 2006 at 07:42 AM
what a great infomation you have... thank you very much
Posted by: | September 13, 2007 at 04:08 AM
what a great information... hahaha
Posted by: mary ann maritan | September 13, 2007 at 04:10 AM
Please check your math. 6.5 l/100km is about 36 miles/gal(us), not 43 mpg as stated above. Yes, that is still much better than in the US, but not as good as you numbers show.
Posted by: snowak | October 03, 2007 at 10:40 AM
There are so few cars and SUV's in the US that average 29 MPG, that figure cannot be correct. On CNN recently a reported had a computer hooked to his Yukon and it determined that on his trip to work he got 4.9 mpg!!!
Posted by: Robert | October 23, 2008 at 04:26 PM
I agree that - as snowak pointed out - 6.5l/100km should be 36.2mpg. But, if you look at the numbers the EPA publishes, the average mpg for all light duty vehicles (cars, minivans, sport utility vehicles, and pickup trucks) is said to be around 20-21mpg for some years now (http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fetrends.htm). That would support the first number used in this article.
Either way - statement from another article on this site: "that level of fuel economy is grossly inadequate, given the geopolitical, geological and environmental constraints and issues we face today".
Posted by: ysmad | October 24, 2008 at 08:22 PM