Green Car Congress
About GCC Contact  RSS Subscribe Twitter headlines

« From Tobacco to Soy for Biodiesel | Main | Oil’s not Well »

Print this post

Lies, Damn Lies, and Polls

11 December 2004

Harris Interactive has released a new study of 15,000 US consumers in which it concludes that enhanced fuel economy attracts strong consumer purchase interest. The study found that 63% of U.S. adult consumers are likely to purchase a new vehicle with enhanced fuel economy, if they have the option, in their next vehicle purchase.

Hmm. We haven’t exactly seen that behavior manifested in the monthly sales figures that show the percentage of light duty trucks and SUVs holding at 61%. But with polls and surveys, so much depends on how the questions are worded, and how the interviewer may explain an unknown product and then probe for an answer.

Here’s a summary of some of the findings:

Harris Interactive AUTOTECHCAST
Advanced Automotive Technologies% Likely to Purchase on Next Vehicle% Familiar
% Likely to Purchase on next vehicle: Includes All Respondents who were Likely, Very Likely, or Extremely Likely to purchase.
% Familiar: Includes all respondents who were Moderately Familiar, Very Familiar, or Extremely Familiar
Fuel Cell Vehicles 52% 24%
Hybrid Electric Vehicles 40% 43%
Clean Diesel Vehicles 31% 16%

I initially discounted both the fuel cell and clean diesel findings as resulting from a lack of understanding about the actual technology. (I doubt 52% will want to wait 10–15+ years for an affordable fuel cell vehicle—but most would have to agree that the concept sounds good.) The % Familiar number bears that out (and it’s a safe assumption that a percentage that claimed familiarity actually did not have it. Be interesting to see the cross tabs between those who said they are likely to buy, and those who are familiar.)

The hybrid number, though, is interesting. A much higher level of familiarity—even slightly higher than those likely to purchase. Even discounting results for all the factors above, the combination of likely to buy and familiarity suggests that the uptake for hybrids could be more rapid than some automakers have projected.

Then again, you hit the question of what, exactly, is a hybrid, and what is the aggregate benefit? Given that automakers will implement various elements of hybrid drives (from micro hybrids such as the GM Silverado to full hybrids such as the Prius) across their lines, what will the aggregate reduction in fuel consumption be? Answer: not as large as you might think. 

Regardless of the specifics, it is positive, I think, for a projected majority of US buyers to at least be aware of fuel economy as a factor, and something they would take into increased consideration in a future purchase. At least there is something to work with.

December 11, 2004 in Fuel Efficiency, Market Background | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)

Comments

It seems like a good start.

Posted by: bill | December 12, 2004 at 02:49 PM

Post a comment
[Please keep comments on topic. Disagreement is fine; insults, abuse or wild diversions are not. Comments not meeting those standards will be deleted. Abuse of another commenter’s email address will result in the banning of the offender from this site. In an attempt to prevent the posting of insulting and abusive comments, this site maintains a list of prohibited words and phrases, which, unfortunately, grows with time. Including one of the prohibited words or phrases will flag the comment as “spam”, and it will be blocked.]

Green Car Congress only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00d8346b45d469e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Lies, Damn Lies, and Polls:

Green Car Congress © 2009 BioAge Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Home | BioAge Group