Green Car Congress
About GCC Contact  RSS Subscribe Twitter headlines

« Danish Towns Fund Hydrogen Train | Main | SeQuential to Open All-Biofuel Station in Oregon »

Print this post

Commercial Automotive Fuel Cells by 2010 or Bust

29 March 2005

Ballard_trendlines_large

Ballard Power Systems, a world leader in developing, manufacturing and marketing PEM (Proton Exchange Membrane) fuel cells, released its “Technology Roadmap” leading to a commercially viable fuel cell by 2010.

The Road Map, announced to coincide with the start of the National Hydrogen Association’s Annual Hydrogen Conference in Washington, D.C., maps out trends and targets in four areas critical for commercial adoption of automotive fuel cell technology:

  • Durability of 5,000 hours of lifetime. According to Ballard, 2,200 hours of durability is equivalent to 100,000 kilometers (62,150 miles) under regular driving conditions.

  • Cost of US $30/kW net. The DOE’s target cost for commercial introduction of a fuel cell system in 2010 is $45 USD/kW of net system power, divided between the fuel cell stack ($30 USD/kW net) and the supporting balance of plant ($15 USD/kW net). Ballard’s target is for the stack, and maps to the DOE’s.

  • Freeze Start capability to -30 ºC, in 30 seconds, to 50% rated power.

  • Volumetric Power Density of 2,500 Watts net/liter. Reducing volumetric power density reflects the ability to package the fuel cell stack into increasingly smaller spaces within a vehicle. Ballard’s target of 2,500 Watts Net/Liter is more aggressive than the DOE’s target of 2,000 Watts net/liter.

In February, Ballard pulled off a “Technology Hat Trick” (earlier post) by demonstrating a fuel cell stack that can start repeatedly from -20° C (-4° F) and operate for more than 2,000 hours at a substantially reduced cost with no performance tradeoff.

Resources:

March 29, 2005 in Fuel Cells, Hydrogen | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)

Comments

"Technology hat trick" give me a break. Honda which licensed Ballard's fuel stack.
Demonstrated that first. So it is obvious that Ballard basically did what Honda did first. Also, you praised GM for more efficient engine using variable timing and cam, guess what Honda did that so long ago it is not even funny.

Posted by: argod | March 29, 2005 at 04:03 PM

Post a comment
[Please keep comments on topic. Disagreement is fine; insults, abuse or wild diversions are not. Comments not meeting those standards will be deleted. Abuse of another commenter’s email address will result in the banning of the offender from this site. In an attempt to prevent the posting of insulting and abusive comments, this site maintains a list of prohibited words and phrases, which, unfortunately, grows with time. Including one of the prohibited words or phrases will flag the comment as “spam”, and it will be blocked.]

Green Car Congress only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00d8343da35f53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Commercial Automotive Fuel Cells by 2010 or Bust:

Green Car Congress © 2009 BioAge Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Home | BioAge Group