« Royal Dutch Shell CEO on the State of the Oil and Gas Industry | Main | Another Major Biomass-to-Ethanol Project in Canada »
Joe Romm: Plug-in Hybrids an “Unadulterated Home Run”
13 June 2005
Joe Romm, who ran the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy at DOE during part of the Clinton Administration and wrote The Hype about Hydrogen, weighs in on the benefits of plug-in hybrids in a message posted to the CalCars newsgroup.
Plug-ins are so new for most of us that we haven’t done a very good job of putting out basic fact sheets.
Hybrids that can be plugged into the electric grid (so-called plug-ins or e-hybrids) will be, I think, the second phase of a two-phase transition that has already begun with the hybrid revolution. The top priority for all of us who want to reduce oil consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in the transportation sector is certainly increasing fuel economy standards...
Electricity has always been the ideal fuel for driving, because electric motors are so efficient (but range and speed of refueling issues limited the attractiveness of pure EVs). This is especially true in cities because electricity-powered cars have zero in-airshed emissions and 10x to 1000x lower lifecycle emissions of all criteria air pollutants, and potentially zero life-cycle emissions in the long term as the grid gets cleaner.
My top priority has always been greenhouse gas emissions. Here plug-ins are an unadulterated home run...
The grid average emissions factor for electricity in this country is, roughly, 1.3 pounds per kWh. That yields 3,900 pounds of CO2! So running your E-hybrid on the U.S. grid is 35% better than running a Prius on gasoline and 65% better than an average car.
For his full rational on the calculation, see the original message. You can sign-up to the CalCars list for ongoing news about the organization, the PRIUS+ and GO-HEVs or PHEVs here.
June 13, 2005 in Plug-ins | Permalink | Comments (5) | TrackBack (0)
Comments
Posted by: gary demos | June 13, 2005 at 08:45 AM
Another reason they're more efficient is because, if they're series hybrids, the gasoline engine runs at a constant speed where it produces peak power, extending the life and fuel economy of the engine. It also reduces or eliminates the need for an expensive-to-produce transmission.
And it will help mature electric motor technology which will aid in the switch to pure EV or hydrogen fuel cell vehicles.
Posted by: Paul | June 13, 2005 at 09:27 AM
"Maybe an artificially generated sound might be appropriate."
It's called a horn. :)
Posted by: stomv | June 13, 2005 at 10:01 AM
One way may work is, the gas engine "only" works as an electric generator, which runs at an optimized rpm. This generator will then in turn generates electricity for charging a small flywheel/battery.
The energy storage device will then in turn provide electricities to the electric motors.
This idea is actually much like diesel powered submarine. Instead of running directly on fuel, the fuel is used instead to directly provide electricity.
The advantage is that, by doing so, the engine can be optimized at a single speed for electricity generation which is far more efficient.
Posted by: Carson | June 13, 2005 at 09:34 PM
stomv: Horns are excessive. Something more directional, less intrusive and more constant is in order, the audible equivalent of the daytime running lights.
I'm aware of NO (zero, zilch, nada) production hybrid which runs its engine at a constant speed. The efficiency cannot be attributed to that; the factors are instead
- A smaller engine with lower frictional losses, and
- Operating the engine at lower speed but higher throttle settings (load) for the same power, which cuts throttling losses.
Posted by: Engineer-Poet | June 16, 2005 at 04:19 PM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00d8347e939469e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Joe Romm: Plug-in Hybrids an “Unadulterated Home Run”:

Twitter headlines
Does anyone who owns a hybrid have problems with pedestrians not hearing their vehicle? The usual sound of the internal combustion engine is a warning for distracted pedestrians. Maybe an artificially generated sound might be appropriate.