Twitter headlines« Background on the Cooney Affair | Main | Englehard Acquires Chinese Syngas Catalyst Company »
Note from GCC: New Design
13 June 2005
As you can see (clearly, I hope!) we’ve changed the design of the site.
If the rendering of the page is cluttered and confusing, you may have to do a “hard refresh” by hitting the Ctrl key while holding down the F5 key. This will update the older version of the Stylesheet that might be cached in your browser.
One of the goals was to make more information accessible “above the fold.”
Let me know what you think.
June 13, 2005 | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)
Comments
Posted by: stomv | June 13, 2005 at 06:25 PM
Much appreciated feedback. It’s clearly the font selection, although I thought it would degrade appropriately. I need a Mac! It may take me a bit to figure out the right way to resolve this.
Thanks!
Posted by: Mike | June 13, 2005 at 06:35 PM
See if that works better. You may need to do a CTRL-F5 combo again.
Thanks!
Posted by: Mike | June 13, 2005 at 06:54 PM
"I need a Mac!"
Yes, yes you do. I've used Windows 3.1 - XP, and linux 2.4 and 2.6 based distros, and Mac OS X. I'm a computer geek, and I love my Mac. It just freaking works, and it is extremely powerful.
As for the fonts, I didn't get a chance to see 'em before you reverted. When you re-revert (invert?), I'll let you know.
Posted by: stomv | June 14, 2005 at 06:00 AM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00d8347ea6f769e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Note from GCC: New Design:
Layout is great, and it does allow for more info "at ones fingertips".
I'm viewing the site with Firefox 1.0.4 using Mac OS X 10.3.9, and I'm finding that the text with the green background (13 June 2005, about, contact, home, topics, field guides, resources, google GCC, from the dashboard) are all rendered quite poorly and are hard to read. I don't know if this is a graphics issue, a font issue, aliasing, or what... I just know that it renders poorly. Perhaps another poster knows more about the root of the problem?
Great revisions though!