Green Car Congress
About GCC Contact  RSS Subscribe Twitter headlines

« TIAX: Rising Oil Prices Make Heavy-Duty Natural Gas Vehicles More Economical than Diesel | Main | Cyprus to Establish Biofuels Requirement »

Print this post

Australia Planning to Adapt to Climate Change Impacts

26 July 2005

The Australian Government has released a report published earlier this year that calls for the beginning of planning to adapt to the inevitable impact of climate change.

Minister for the Environment and Heritage Senator Ian Campbell called the report an important part of the process in responding to climate change, and said that the next step was to begin adaptation planning in key sectors and regions.

From the report:

Over the past decade or more the national and international focus has predominantly been on strategies to reduce greenhouse emissions. There has been, in many countries and in the international negotiations on climate change, an unwillingness to devote serious attention to adaptation strategies.

Some level of climate change is inevitable irrespective of emission reduction strategies. This inevitability is reflected in the conclusion of the IPCC in their 2001 Assessment Report that adaptation is now a necessary strategy to complement emission mitigation efforts.

[...]An adaptation strategy will aim to increase the resilience of human and natural systems to possible changes in climate conditions where this is likely to be feasible and cost effective, and takes account of the social dimensions of distributing losses. It is a framework for managing future climate risk. It offers the potential of reducing future economic, social, and environmental costs as well as protecting life.

An adaptation strategy, to be effective, must result in climate risk being considered as a normal part of decision-making, allowing governments, businesses and individuals to reflect their risk preferences just as they would for other risk assessments. In this sense, adaptation strategies will fail if they continue in the long run to be seen in a ‘silo’ separate from other dimensions of strategic planning and risk management.

The US and Australia have refused to sign the Kyoto protocol designed to slow the emissions of anthropogenic greenhouse gases.

However, Australia, the US, China, India and South Korea reportedly have joined in a secret regional pact on greenhouse emissions to replace the Kyoto protocol.

The alliance, which is yet to be announced, will bring together nations that together account for more than 40 per cent of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions.

To be known as the Asia-Pacific Partnership for Clean Development and Climate, the grouping will aim to use the latest technologies to limit emissions and to make sure the technologies are available in the areas and industries that need them most.

The US initiative has been discussed between the five nations for five months and is viewed as a practical attempt to rein in greenhouse emissions without harming development or economic growth in the region. (The Australian)

Of 17 initiatives listed by the Australian government as measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, only one deals directly with the transportation sector: an A$33.6 million (US$25.5 million) Alternative Fuels Conversion Program that funds up to 50% of the incremental cost of the purchase, conversion or fuel systems upgrade of buses and commercial vehicles over 3.5 ton gross vehicle mass to operate on CNG or LPG.

Resources:

July 26, 2005 in Australia, Climate Change | Permalink | Comments (7) | TrackBack (0)

Comments

They say the first step in solving a problem is to admit the problem exists. Now we need a 78 page report on how to fix it.

Posted by: Aussie | July 26, 2005 at 03:49 PM

Don't get your hopes up. We have a coal mining government here that takes its queues from the Bush administration. When George W says its OK Mr Howard will act.

Posted by: Ender | July 26, 2005 at 05:18 PM

I just looked at the intitiatives. The $561 million is for clean coal - CO2 sequestration. Our government was just pressured into reinstating the highly successful PV rebate scheme which it was not going to renew. It has successfully stopped an increase in the Mandatory Renewable Energy Target (MRET) which stands at a paltry 2% bowing to pressure from the aluminium industry. This in a country with probably the richest renewable potential in the world.

Most of the rest of it is a rural vote buying exercise in marginal country seats that its coalition partners, the National (country) Party, wants to save seats. It is money to turn sugar into ethanol.

Posted by: Ender | July 26, 2005 at 05:25 PM

On reflection I have to agree that nothing is going to happen anytime soon. The Howard and Bush administrations seem to be in lock-step on energy policy. Perhaps they pass each other notes under the table. On a per-capita basis Australia is a worse greenhouse emitter than the US. Australia also exports a lot of coal to China, which is conveniently overlooked. The fact they have admitted global warming is a problem is a bit like going to the end of the diving board; if you chicken out it doesn't look good. Provided you have any sense of shame.

Posted by: Aussie | July 26, 2005 at 08:34 PM

Even if a clean coal project sequesters the carbon there will still be enormous amounts of new water generated.

Posted by: tom | July 27, 2005 at 12:33 PM

Considering the trillions of dollars invested in fossil fuels $100 million is a pittance and shows how little these governments care about GHG reduction.

Posted by: tom | July 27, 2005 at 12:40 PM

I calculated that Australia would have to sequester 140 million tons of CO2 per year to offset all its coal CO2. Thats a lot. By the time you spend money on the CO2 pipelines and sequestering technology and researching scrubbing CO2 and how to sequester it you could have bought thousands of Wind turbines and Solar Thermal plants like the Solar Tower. There would also be enough left over to cut our power use by 30 or 40% with more efficient technology.

In Australia we could build enough of these to generate all our power from renewables and not have to sequester 1 kg of CO2.

Posted by: Ender | July 27, 2005 at 08:41 PM

Post a comment
[Please keep comments on topic. Disagreement is fine; insults, abuse or wild diversions are not. Comments not meeting those standards will be deleted. Abuse of another commenter’s email address will result in the banning of the offender from this site. In an attempt to prevent the posting of insulting and abusive comments, this site maintains a list of prohibited words and phrases, which, unfortunately, grows with time. Including one of the prohibited words or phrases will flag the comment as “spam”, and it will be blocked.]

Green Car Congress only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00d8348e45ff69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Australia Planning to Adapt to Climate Change Impacts:

Green Car Congress © 2009 BioAge Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Home | BioAge Group