Green Car Congress
About GCC Contact  RSS Subscribe Twitter headlines

« NABI Tours its 60-Foot Articulated Hybrid BRT Bus Out West | Main | Toyota Pushing Lithium-Ion Development »

Print this post

Torotrak Infinitely Variable Transmission Finds Business in Outdoor Power, Targets Hybrids for the Future

15 December 2005

Ivt2
Cross-section of the IVT.

Torotrak, the UK developer of a fuel-efficient toroidal “infinitely variable transmission” (IVT), has formed a 50–50 joint venture with MTD Holdings Inc to apply technology to the Outdoor Power Equipment (OPE) market.

The new venture, named Infinitrak, will boost Torotrak’s revenue while the company continues to work on placing its IVT not just in conventional vehicles, but in new parallel-hybrid systems as well. An IVT-based parallel hybrid can, according to the company, provide a greater than 35% increase in fuel efficiency over conventional vehicles, thereby matching the fuel efficiency gains of more complex and expensive series-parallel hybrid drives.

The outdoor power deal. Under the terms of the joint venture, Torotrak will vest in Infinitrak exclusive global rights to IVT technology in the 0-25kw power range, and exclusive North American rights in the 25-45kW power range for certain products.

Infinitrak expects to commence manufacture of IVT units in 2006. Production in the first full year of manufacture is expected to exceed 100,000 units. The OPE Market includes annual sales of more than 2 million powered ride-on products in the United States alone.

The automotive market. Automotive, however, remains the key target market for Torotrak, which has been working with Equos and Koyo for a number of years to develop production prototypes of the IVT, although the company has yet to ink a volume distribution deal with an auto major. (Hence the importance of the outdoor power market as a revenue stream.)

Equos is the company within the Aisin AW group that undertakes new product development. Aisin is the world’s largest tier 1 supplier of automatic transmissions, and a key early partner with Toyota in the development of the Hybrid Synergy Drive.

According to Torotrak CEO Dick Elsy, the company is making progress with its automotive work.

The current three-way project to develop a transmission with Equos and Koyo is now focused on the calibration of the compact IVT in the unnamed target customer’s vehicle.

The calibration process is crucial to getting the best out of the transmission in the eyes of their customer, one of the world’s foremost car companies. This involves a comprehensive optimization of engine and transmission, to achieve the optimum combination of fuel economy, performance and driving feel. This is a normal but critical development process for any new transmission.

The continued extensive evaluation of IVT by another global car company has led to a program of work to understand the performance of IVT in a specific vehicle which they manufacture. This vehicle, which features a large diesel engine, already enjoys good fuel economy but we have been able to demonstrate that a further improvement of 9.5% is possible with the IVT design considered for this application.

The competitive bidding process started last year by a further car company has reached the point where that company has informed the bidders that it wishes to consider working with another car company using the same transmission manufacturer to build IVTs. Torotrak is assisting in this process to bring together interested parties to realize this goal.

—Dick Elsy, CEO

A decision by Toyota Motor in 2000 to terminate a licence agreement with Torotrak sent the company’s shares plummeting more than 60%. Toyota gave as its reason “unacceptable driveability” in the form of vibration in the Toyota IVT-equipped prototype.

At the time, Torotrak’s potential had pushed the company’s valuation to nearly £400 million (US$705 million). A similar decision by GM early in 2002 had a similar effect, precipitously knocking down the stock price even further.

Ivt1
Generic simplified (and expanded) layout of the IVT.

The IVT. Torotrak was created in 1998 out of the BTG Group, although work on what would become the Torotrak IVT began in 1988. This type of approach to a transmission has a long history, reaching back to an 1877 patent by Charles Hunt.

Key elements of the IVT are:

  • The input gearset. The input gearset transmits the power from the engine via the low regime clutch to the planet gear in the epicyclic gear train.

  • The variator. The variator is the means by which the IVT can deliver an infinite range of ratios. It effects the speed of rotation of the sun gear in the epicyclic and is responsible for the smooth variation of ratios which the Torotrak transmission produces.

    Ivt3
    Compact variator assembly with roller detail.

    Inside the variator are two pairs of discs. The space between each pair of discs forms a hollow doughnut shape or toroid. Within each toroidal space there are three rollers. These rollers transmit drive from the outer, engine driven, discs to the output discs located in the centre. The rollers transfer power between the input discs and the output discs via a traction fluid.

    Each roller is attached to a hydraulic piston. The pressure in the pistons can be increased or decreased to create a range of reaction torque within the variator.

    When the rotational velocities of the input and/or output discs change, the rollers automatically alter their inclination in order to adjust to the new operating conditions.

    By varying the angles of the variators, the drive ratio can be changed infinitely, and by using a system of lockable clutches and the epicyclic gearset, the drive transmitted to the road wheels is totally seamless, unlike that of a conventional automatic, in which fixed ratios are engaged as required.

  • Traction fluid. The traction fluid—a special oil—separates the rollers from the discs. Long chain molecules used in the traction fluid interlock with each other when the fluid is compressed, becoming highly viscous (glassy) under pressure. As pressure is exerted at the contact points between the rollers and the discs the oil resists the tendency to slide and transmits the power effectively.

    Thus, power transmission in the IVT is achieved by traction, (by shearing the thin, elasto-hydrodynamic fluid film) and not through metal-to-metal friction.

  • Epicyclic (planetary) gearset. The central gear (sun gear) is driven by the output of the variator. The planet gears are driven directly by the engine. The outer annulus gear is connected to the wheels. The change of ratio in the variator (the speed it transmits) alters the relative speeds of the sun and planet gears.

  • Fixed ratio chain. This takes the drive from the output discs and transmits it to the sun gear of the epicyclic gearset and the input of the high regime clutch.

  • High regime clutch. The Torotrak IVT operates in two regimes activated by the engagement and disengagement of clutches which act as on/off switches. In low regime the epicyclic gearset is included in the power path from the engine. In high regime the output from the variator is directly connected to the road wheels.

The basic IVT offers four main benefits:

  1. Torque-Based Control. The IVT is torque controlled, which essentially means that the required system torque is set by hydraulic pressure and the variator follows the ratio automatically. This control approach eliminates the need for a starting device such as a torque converter or friction clutch (also adding to the increased fuel efficiency).

  2. High Overdrive. Very high levels of overdrive have been demonstrated in vehicles equipped with Torotrak’s IVT—the Expedition test vehicles have achieved 74mph @ 1,000 rpm.

  3. Optimized Engine Running. The ratio range of the IVT provides an almost total decoupling of engine and vehicle speed. Thus a control line can be set which, for any given power demand, will operate the engine at a pre-determined torque and speed, largely independent of vehicle speed. This control line ensures that the engine always operates at minimum specific fuel consumption, i.e. at maximum efficiency. Typically, this means that the engine operates at low speed (reduced friction losses) and high torque (reduced throttling losses).

    Fixed ratio transmissions, with a smaller ratio range, must operate at higher speed and lower torque when delivering the same power to the wheels—hence their inferior fuel economy. In practice, the control line is the result of a multi-variable optimization, to ensure emissions and NVH are also controlled to provide the optimum trade-off. The result is that the IVT delivers a validated fuel economy benefit of 20% over a conventional four-speed automatic transmission, and more than 10% over a six-speed automatic transmission with emissions well within requirements.

  4. Low-Speed Control. The IVT is able to provide sensitive, safe control of vehicle speed under extreme conditions, without the need for a low range gearset.

Torotrak has recently developed a lower-cost variator control mechanism—Epicycloidal Roller Control (ERC)—that promises further significant cost reductions for the transmission.

The IVT in Hybrids. On the hybrid front, Torotrak is collaborating with Cranfield University in developing a parallel-hybrid IVT applied in the Ford Expedition.

We are able to offer a 20% fuel economy improvement from the fitment of IVT to a conventional vehicle growing to more than 35% improvement with the parallel hybrid IVT derivative.

Our results also show that the hybrid IVT is capable of producing very significant fuel economy gains whilst the vehicle is cruising at speed—an area where many current generation hybrid vehicles perform relatively poorly. These results bode well for “real-world” fuel economy improvement.

—Dick Elsy

Achieving reductions in fuel consumption at highway speeds is one of the design rationales behind the GM-Chrysler-BMW work on a two-mode hybrid system. (Earlier post.)

Ivt4
Parallel hybrid layout featuring IVT

Basically, Torotrak’s contention is that a parallel-hybrid drive (a “mild” hybrid where the electric motor provides additive traction but does not drive the vehicle on its own) built with an IVT could match the increased fuel efficiency benefit of a more complex, series-parallel (“power split”) hybrid architecture (e.g., the Prius), but at lower cost and less complexity—primarily through the efficiencies gained from the optimum control of the engine.

In other words, Torotrak is suggesting that although its IVT hybrid wouldn’t have an all-electric mode, its increased base engine efficiency combined with the boost from the electric motor would match the fuel efficiency of series-parallel hybrids on the market (and be less expensive).

To test this out, Torotrak is working with Cranfield University and Newage (an electric motor company) with support from UK Government program, Foresight Vehicle. The purpose of the project—Electrically Assisted Infinitely Variable Transmission—is to quantify the combined benefits in combining a mild parallel hybrid system with IVT, first through modelling and then in a physical vehicle.

Resources:

December 15, 2005 in Engines, Europe, Fuel Efficiency, Hybrids, Vehicle Systems | Permalink | Comments (10) | TrackBack (0)

Comments

Hum, it looks like a Prius's transmission, but using hydraulic fluid to control the sun gear instead of an electric motor.

It's hard to see how this could be either cheaper or more reliable than the Prius transmission which has only a few moving parts.

Posted by: Ash | December 17, 2005 at 05:37 PM

Once you decide to use the following super nanotech lithium-ion batteries in hybrids (instead of all-electric battery vehicles), why not forget about a transmission and use only a generator with the batteries & motor(s)??? In other words, trade the transmission for a small generator and larger motor(s). Eventually, even the generator (with its ICE) will be replaced by direct-ethanol or alkaline fuel cells, or more batteries.

http://www.greencarcongress.com/2005/11/a123systems_lau.html

http://www.a123systems.com/html/home.html

Posted by: Jay D | December 20, 2005 at 09:39 AM

Ash, Torotrak IVT uses a full toroidal variator to provide the CVT function, which is inherently more efficient for transmitting power than electric motors and power electronics. Hydraulics are used to provide the torque reaction across the variator - this is not a variation on a hydrostatic unit. Cost reduction comes about because the IVT can be hybridised or non-hybridised, which cannot be said for the Prius etc. Also in hybridisation form only one electric machine is required, unlike two for the Prius.

Posted by: easyrider | December 20, 2005 at 02:17 PM

A Torotrak IVT parallel hybrid CANNOT be as efficient as the Prius' Hybrid Synergy Drive (HSD). This is because of inherent friction inside the transmission itself, even in the cruising mode. The IVT, with its many hydro-mechanical connections, is rife with efficiency-robbing friction, with an estimated efficiency of no more than~80%, whereas in the Prius' HSD at cruising speed, 75% or more of engine's torque is coupled directly to the differential housing thus incurring no friction loss, and only 25% of the engine torque is subjected to an 80%-efficient generator-motor route. A typical 4-speed automatic transmission has about 75-85% efficiency in power transmission from the engine. A Prius II has a tank-to-wheel efficiency of about 37%, which is more than double that of comparable automobile, and this is very hard to beat!!! This is perhaps why Toyota has cancelled its licensing contract with Torotrak.

Posted by: Roger Pham | January 01, 2006 at 03:09 PM

Roger, The full toroidal variator achieves efficiencies above 90% (up to 96% for an optimised traction coefficient) and the IVT, in highway cruising conditions, will achieve transmission efficiencies of circa 86-88%, and that includes hydraulic power consumption - see Torotrak's SAE papers. A fixed ratio transmission (manual or auto with locked torque converter) will achieve higher efficiencies still (>90%). However, the level of overdrive provided by manuals and autos is significantly less that the IVT (up to 100% less if you compare IVT overdrive with 4 speed auto top gear). The Prius HSD system can achieve higher transmission efficiencies than IVT but at the sacrifice of overdrive, i.e. the engine runs at higher speed lower load. Running the engine at lower speed and higher load for better engine efficiency increases the electrical power path split, hence reducing HSD transmission efficiency. As always one has to treat the powertrain as a complete system and not just compare transmissions.

However my biggest gripe with all of these 'complex' hybrid systems (Toyota, GM, DC) is that in reverse, at pullaway, and low forward speed, the transmssion output torque/power is constrained by the output motor alone, not by the engine. This may not be a problem for passenger cars but for full size trucks and SUVs...?

Posted by: easyrider | January 03, 2006 at 08:59 AM

Mr. easyrider, actually, the reverse is true for the Toyota HSD: running the engine at low speed at higher torque actually transmit more torque MECHANICALLY to the driving wheels, and the reverse of this, running the engine at higher speed will rev up the generator of the HSD and hence transmitting more power proportionally via the electrical route. Operationally, the HSD transmission will simulate "low gear" by reving up the engine while the driving wheels are still turning slowly at slow vehicular speed, forcing the generator to produce more electricity, which will then be fed to the electric motor to augment the torque of the engine. When the driving wheels are reaching high rpm at cruise while the engine slows down, then "low gear" is simulated because most of the power will be sent mechanically direct to the driving wheels, while the generator is turning slowly, hence little power will be lost via the generator-motor mode. Toyota's HSD is truly a CVT (Continously-Variable-Transmission) with very few moving parts, and is quite unbeatable in term of efficiency AND reliability.

In respond to your "biggest gripe with all of these 'complex' hybrid systems" (actually, they are very simple) Toyota furnished its hybrid Hylander SUV and Lexus SUV an additional motor driving the rear wheels in addition to the front wheels, hence boosting overall torque with more driving motors, AND also having 4-wheel-drive benefit at the same time.

Posted by: Roger Pham | January 03, 2006 at 09:49 PM

The so called efficiency of the Toyota Hybrids is surely an illusion. The nominal efficiency is only gained if the vehicle usage involves lots of braking to allow the regenerative cycle to charge the batteries. In town it can give decent fuel economy but on the open road it cannot even match an equivalent modern petrol engined vehicle due to the weight of batteries and other kit it has to lug about. Whilst battery technology will probably improve the batteries alone already cost more than the cost of a Torotrak transmission and the batteries do not even last the vehicle life. In my view the Parallel (Mild) Hybrid with Torotrak IVT has a genuine potential as a contender on both cost and economy to the current breed of Hybrid vehicles. There are reports that Toyota themselves will head down the parallel hybrid route in their next generation of Hybrid vehicles. Torotrak have continued and are still working extensively with Toyota subsidiaries, Aisin, Equos and Koyo on production prototype IVT's (without hybridisation), with the Japanese companies currently committing significant funds and effort.

Posted by: jspen27 | January 05, 2006 at 01:35 AM

Roger, From my understanding there is an efficiency 'sweet spot' on the HSD when the sun gear (attached to the generator) is stationary resulting in zero electrical power flow (termed the mechanical point). This position of this 'sweet spot' is defined by the planetary gearset basic ratio. Operating the transmission either above or below this ratio will result in electrical power flow between the motor and generator. In fact, if the transmission ratio is 'taller' than the mechanical point ratio, the generator acts as a motor and the motor acts as a generator (assuming constant state-of-charge operation). The mechanical point on the Prius is similar to 4th gear on a conventional automatic transmission. Therefore operating the engine 'optimally' (i.e. at low speed) will, under typical drive cycle conditions, require the HSD to operate away from its 'sweet spot' to a 'taller' ratio.

The point I'm trying to make is that 'complex' hybrid transmission efficiency is ratio dependent, which is not the case for the Torotrak IVT (in high regime). That said one has to consider the complete powertrain (engine and transmission) when determining the most frugal solution.

I am aware that the Highlander hybrid has a 2nd motor for the rear axle alone. This is attractive as it removes the need for a prop shaft. However that means three motor/generators are required, whereas a conventional parallel hybrid needs only one (plus prop shaft). It’s also worth noting that the IVT (hybrid or non-hybrid) can generate traction limiting torque at pull away (forwards or backwards) under part-throttle conditions – this makes engine downsizing more feasible.

In conclusion, this is not a ‘black and white’ issue. There are advantages and disadvantages with both architectures (complex hybrid and parallel IVT hybrid).

Posted by: easyrider | January 08, 2006 at 06:44 AM

CVT automatic transmissions are most efficient than conventional automatic transmissions and manual ones.
Anyway I am sure that CVT transmissions may soon come.
The problem of the basic CVT made until now is it capacity in transmitting a torque as high as needed to move an ordinary american car, a bus or a truck. The main parts used for this job in my opinion, are nor addecuate.
A prototype of a CVT automatic transmission is available to demostrate the following:
1- Such a prototype basically comprises: a hydraulic torque converter and a set of planetary gears. Only that
2- No valves body, no multi-disc brakes, no electronic devices are required. No pulleys and belts , no friction parts are required.
3-Its a continously variable automatic transmission US patented and latest improvements patent pending.
More information is available.

Ing. M. Meitin

Posted by: M Meitin | April 29, 2007 at 02:13 PM

Can anyone give me hard info on efficiencies of today's typical auto tranmissions including torque converter?
By hard I mean something that can be referenced in a technical paper.

Posted by: lloydco | April 02, 2008 at 10:44 PM

Post a comment
[Please keep comments on topic. Disagreement is fine; insults, abuse or wild diversions are not. Comments not meeting those standards will be deleted. Abuse of another commenter’s email address will result in the banning of the offender from this site. In an attempt to prevent the posting of insulting and abusive comments, this site maintains a list of prohibited words and phrases, which, unfortunately, grows with time. Including one of the prohibited words or phrases will flag the comment as “spam”, and it will be blocked.]

Green Car Congress only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00d834a2879469e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Torotrak Infinitely Variable Transmission Finds Business in Outdoor Power, Targets Hybrids for the Future:

Green Car Congress © 2009 BioAge Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Home | BioAge Group