Green Car Congress
About GCC Contact  RSS Subscribe Twitter headlines

« Biodiesel Fleet Trials and Adoption | Main | Diesel Exhaust May Impair the Functioning of Blood Vessels, Leading to Heart Attack or Stroke »

Print this post

US Trucking Industry Will Spend $87.7 Billion on Fuel in 2005, Up 33% from 2004

19 December 2005

Dieselcost
The real price of diesel is back up to its level during the energy crisis in the early 80s.

The American Trucking Associations estimates that the US trucking industry will spend $87.7 billion on fuel in 2005—a 33% increase over the $65.9 billion spent in 2004. The ATA increased its earlier estimate of $85 billion issued in September after the government issued new data on fuel consumption.

For many motor carriers, fuel represents the second-highest operating expense, accounting for as much as 25% of total operating costs, according to the group.

Trucking companies are already bracing for the higher fuel cost of ultra low-sulfur diesel (ULSD), scheduled to hit the market in mid-2006. ULSD could add between 5 and 13 cents per gallon to the cost of producing and distributing on-road fuel.

Furthermore, meeting the more stringent EPA emissions standards coming into effect in 2007 will likely result in higher engine prices and rising prices and a greater degradation of fuel economy than expected. (Earlier post.)

The Energy Information Administration (EIA), in its latest Short-Term Energy Outlook, projects that retail on-road diesel prices will average $2.54/gallon in 2006, up 5.4% ($0.13) from this year. (The EIA estimates gasoline prices will rise 6.6% to an average $2.42.)

The EIA estimates that in 2006, total domestic energy demand will increase at an annual rate of about 2.0%, despite continued concerns about tight supplies and projected high prices for oil and natural gas. Prices for crude oil, petroleum products, and natural gas are projected to remain high through 2006 because of continuing tight international supplies and hurricane-induced supply losses.

December 19, 2005 in Diesel, Fleets, Fuel Efficiency | Permalink | Comments (6) | TrackBack (2)

Comments

I always wondered why trucks have rear ends with hypo-gears and not trans axles. A lot of buses have trans axles in them. By reversing this configuration and using it in a semi a 25% fuel saving and power increase could be achieved.

Posted by: Cameron Dell | December 19, 2005 at 08:58 AM

Diesel seems to be losing its economic advantage over spark ignition engines for the forseeable future.

Posted by: tom deplume | December 19, 2005 at 10:56 AM

When diesel is 30-40% more expensive than gasoline (like it is now), the MPG benefit of diesel is nil.

Mileage aside, as long as diesel maintenance costs remain below those of gasoline engines and diesels produce prodigious amounts of torque (neither of these will ever change) diesel will never lose its inherent economic advantage.

That is, unless diesel goes 60-90% higher cost per gallon than gasoline.

Posted by: Adam H. | December 19, 2005 at 04:40 PM

An Atkinson cycle driving an hydraulic system could better the low end torque of diesels, use less fuel per ton/mile, and be able to use a wider range of cleaner fuels like E85. Maintanence costs of spark ignition engines have dropped several fold over the last 30 years due to the use of unleaded gasoline, improvements in materials, better lubricants, and electronic ignition and fuel injection.

Posted by: tom deplume | December 20, 2005 at 07:15 AM

Maybe this will cause truck operators to finely wise-up to the benefits of fuel economy improvements. There are a whole host of things, from boat tails to hydrogen boost systems, that could be done to improve the fuel efficiency of our trucking fleet and we all know, fuel efficiency can have an incredibly positive impact.

Posted by: Jesse Jenkins | December 21, 2005 at 02:16 PM

My son is a long haul truck driver. He tells me that he has heard about a bill that congress is reviewing, that if enacted, sets a maximum standard speed limit for all semis nation wide. Do you know anything about this bill? Thanks,
Bill S.

Posted by: Bill | October 19, 2006 at 02:26 PM

Post a comment
[Please keep comments on topic. Disagreement is fine; insults, abuse or wild diversions are not. Comments not meeting those standards will be deleted. Abuse of another commenter’s email address will result in the banning of the offender from this site. In an attempt to prevent the posting of insulting and abusive comments, this site maintains a list of prohibited words and phrases, which, unfortunately, grows with time. Including one of the prohibited words or phrases will flag the comment as “spam”, and it will be blocked.]

Green Car Congress only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00d8342479d853ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference US Trucking Industry Will Spend $87.7 Billion on Fuel in 2005, Up 33% from 2004:

» The Week in Sustainable Vehicles (12/25/05) from WorldChanging: Another World Is Here
Mike Millikin covers the continuing evolution of personal transportation at Green Car Congress Analyses of the average global temperatures in 2005 released by four scientific... [Read More]

Tracked on Dec 25, 2005 4:54:14 PM

» This Week in Sustainable Transportation from WorldChanging: Another World Is Here
Analyses of the average global temperatures in 2005 released by four scientific agenciesThe National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA); NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies;... [Read More]

Tracked on Dec 25, 2005 5:03:29 PM

Green Car Congress © 2009 BioAge Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Home | BioAge Group