Green Car Congress
About GCC Contact  RSS Subscribe Twitter headlines

« Black-Box Biodiesel | Main | EU, EPA and CARB Cooperate to Curb Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Mobile Air Conditioners »

Print this post

President Bush Pushes for Plug-in Hybrids

20 February 2006

Bushplugin
Plug-in fever. The White House has this shot of the CalCars plug-in Prius on its website.

On a week-long swing to promote his Advanced Energy Initiative, announced in the State of the Union address (earlier post), President Bush selected battery-maker Johnson Controls as a venue to make the case for the importance of plug-in hybrids.

Re-iterating his stated intention to reduce and then to eliminate US reliance on oil, the President outlined three ways to do that: (1) invest in vehicles that require much less gasoline; (2) find new fuels that will replace gasoline; and (3) develop new ways to run a car without gasoline at all.

The most promising ways to reduce gasoline consumption quickly is through hybrid vehicles...the twin sources of power allow hybrid cars and trucks to travel about twice as far on a gallon of fuel as gasoline-only vehicles. That is a good start when something that can go twice as far on a gallon of gasoline than the conventional vehicle can.

But there is more to be done, and that’s why I’m here at Johnson Controls, because engineers here are working on ways to replace the current hybrid battery technology with advanced lithium-ion batteries that are now used in cell phones and laptops.

Using new lithium ion batteries, engineers will be able to design the next generation of hybrid vehicles, called plug-in hybrids, that can be recharged through a standard electrical outlet. Start picturing what I’m talking about: you’ve got your car, you pull in, you plug it right in the wall.

Development will make a big difference in the performance of hybrid cars and trucks. Instead of depending on the gasoline engine to recharge the electric battery, the plug-in hybrids will have fully charged batteries as soon as you get in the automobile. And that means plug-in hybrids will be able to travel much greater distances on electricity alone, thereby saving more gas for our consumers, thereby making us less dependent on oil.

The plug-in hybrid, they estimate, can initially go 40 miles on electricity alone. So you’ve got a lot of folks living in cities like Milwaukee, Wisconsin, who generally don’t drive more than 40 miles a day. Therefore, within 40 miles you’ll be on electricity and using no gasoline. Eventually, plug-in hybrids with lithium ion batteries will be able to get 100 miles per gallon. And now all of a sudden you’re beginning to see the effects of this important technology on our national security and on our economic security.

Plug-in hybrids are a really important part of the strategy I’ve announced, and we’re going to provide $31 million to speed up research on these advanced technologies—this is a 27% increase over current funding levels.

The President continued on to touch on ethanol and the important development of cellulosic ethanol from “wood chips and stalks and switch grass, and other natural materials,” as well as on the ongoing research to develop hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles.

Turning his attention to power generation, the President called for the expansion of the use of coal, nuclear power and wind and solar.

I think we ought to start building nuclear power plants again. I think it makes sense to do so. Technology is such that we can do so and say to the American people, these are safe—and they’re important.

The administration has also launched what’s called Nuclear Power 2010 Initiative. It’s a $1.1 billion partnership between the government and industry to facilitate new plant orders.

We’re also going to work with other nations to help them build nuclear power industries. And the reason why is this is a global world in which we live and demand for oil in China and India affects price here in America. And so, therefore, if we can help relieve the pressure off of demand for fossil fuels, it helps the entire world.

Bush then spoke of the importance of solar and wind power. (Next stop on his tour is Ovonics, to highlight the company’s work with photovoltaic cells.)

The technology—solar technology has the potential to change the way we live and work, if you really think about it. The whole purpose of spending money on solar power—and we intend to spend $150 million next year in funding for both government and private research—is to bring to market as quickly as possible this important and impressive technology. It’s really going to help change the way we live, we think, and we want solar power to become competitive by 2015.

More than $3 billion worth of equipment to generate electricity from wind was installed in America last year. In other words, it’s a new industry, it’s beginning to grow.

About 6 percent of the continental US has been identified as highly suitable for construction of wind turbines. Some have estimated that this area alone has the potential to supply up to 20 percent of our nation's electricity. In other words, they’ve identified 6 percent of the country’s landmass as a good place for wind turbines that, if installed with the right technology, could have a major effect on the electricity that we all use. So we’re proposing additional money for research and development.

Think about how your children or your grandchildren may be able to spend a President’s Day in the future. If you’re planning a trip to visit relatives, you can plug in your hybrid car the night before and drive the first 40 miles on your lithium ion battery. If you’ve got more distance to go, you can fill up at your local ethanol station. If you’re in Wisconsin, you’ll be filling it up with corn product. In Crawford, it may just be switch grass. You may decide to travel in a hydrogen-powered minivan, and refuel at a station with hydrogen generated by a local nuclear power plant. When you finally make it to where you’re going, you can sit at a house that is lit by clean coal, or wind energy, or solar-powered roof over your head.

February 20, 2006 in Plug-ins | Permalink | Comments (28) | TrackBack (2)

Comments

Hmm...what many of the above posters fail to realize is that the people who read this website are likely to be of a similar mind set and oriented towards environmental protection and conservation of resources. There is a VAST majority of the US population that is not as concerned and only recently starting to even notice the use of fossil fuels (due completely to the recent spike in prices for heating fuel and gas). How many people do you see everyday driving light duty trucks, SUVs, and V-8 powered luxury boats? The reason why we don't have the vast infrastructure for alternative energy sources and more efficient vehicles is simply because it is consumer driven and until recently consumers didn't give a damn about how much fuel they were using. I doubt the vast majority who don't give a damn and want to waste fuel are going to let a minority create excessive taxes on fuel...

Posted by: Patrick | February 21, 2006 at 10:24 PM

Don't forget that PHEVs require additional electricity to be generated somewhere and then distributed over long distances since no-one wants that new power station in their neighborhood (negative effect on real estate value). This might change with efficient, small-scale heat-cold-power co-generation incorporating absorption chillers but I'm not holding my breath for that to happen anytime soon.

Additional losses with PHEVs accrue during charging/discharging and from lugging all those extra batteries around. Bottom line: overall thermodynamic efficiency is probably similar to ye olde ICE. PHEVs will not rid the US of its addiction to oil, unless it opts for renewable (i.e. expensive) or nuclear (i.e. expensive, unsafe AND dirty) power generation.

What you do get macroeconomically is slightly improved air quality in densely polulated areas, at the expense of pollution elsewhere, a mountain of old batteries and, an increased risk of electrical fires (someone is sure to overload his household circuits...)

Moreover, if PHEVs ever do become mainstream you can be sure that the treasury will claw back the fuel tax avoided by slapping some type of special fee on them. Free lunches do not last.

IMHO, the momentum behind PHEV has more to do with the arcane details of California's contorted AT-PZEV credits than with any sound transportation, energy or environmental policy.

Better: increase taxes on gasoline to European levels (i.e. ~$5/gallon at the pump) and have the IRS send each taxpayer a $1000 check each year, even those that don't even own a car. If you do and it gets more than ~32.5 mpg average based on how you actually drive it, you've earned yourself a net tax break. If it guzzles gas, you burn a serious hole in your pocket.

Posted by: Rafael Seidl | February 22, 2006 at 12:01 PM

Yup, our favorite Bait & Switch Selfservative Republican does it again. Not a sincere bone in his body. Funny, a grassroots common sense energy campaign wouldn't cost him a dime. But, then Government will never open the purse strings to help a human being unless it requires killing another human being.
On hot days I notice SUVs idling with their air conditioners on, while the occupants talk on their cellphones. Imagine a mandate to reduce idling to 2 cylinders or 12 volt compressors like on the Honda Hybrid.
I sold Hondas in the 70s and will always remember the look of disgust when people discovered they only came in a 4 CYLINDER! They still do it today. My CRV gets 29mpg on the highway But when people hear it's just a 4 banger, they loose interest. I suppose they hang pictures with a sledgehammer. "I needs my V8 to camp in the left lane with my blinker on!"
I propose Permanent Gas Tax Holidays for 4 Cylinder or ULEVs or better. If you need a V6 or V8 to idle while you chat, 0r 400 horsepower to prove your manhood, then you should pay more for your Carbon Footprint.
I say we take Bush's energy research dollars, call China and order 100,000 PHEVs a year. We could have them in 6 weeks. At least some good would come out of that.

I'm using my Borrowed Stimulus Money from China to spend on useless Chinese Crap!

Posted by: Voltaic | May 13, 2008 at 05:29 PM

Post a comment
[Please keep comments on topic. Disagreement is fine; insults, abuse or wild diversions are not. Comments not meeting those standards will be deleted. Abuse of another commenter’s email address will result in the banning of the offender from this site. In an attempt to prevent the posting of insulting and abusive comments, this site maintains a list of prohibited words and phrases, which, unfortunately, grows with time. Including one of the prohibited words or phrases will flag the comment as “spam”, and it will be blocked.]

Green Car Congress only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00d8345a8c9469e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference President Bush Pushes for Plug-in Hybrids:

» Ok! What did you do with the real George Bush! from Centerfield
Green car congress is reporting on a speech by W that sounds like something I would write. Which is an extraordinarily scare thing. Plug-in hybrids, nuclear power..... “The administration has also launched what’s called Nuclear Power 2010 Initiative. I... [Read More]

Tracked on Feb 20, 2006 5:48:43 PM

» Ok! What did you do with the real George Bush! from Centerfield
Green car congress is reporting on a speech by W that sounds like something I would write. Which is an extraordinarily scary thing. Plug-in hybrids, nuclear power..... “The administration has also launched what’s called Nuclear Power 2010 Initiative. I... [Read More]

Tracked on Feb 20, 2006 6:42:53 PM

Green Car Congress © 2009 BioAge Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Home | BioAge Group