Green Car Congress
About GCC Contact  RSS Subscribe Twitter headlines

« EPA Promotes its Green Technology | Main | Open-Source DIY Plug-in Prius...in a Weekend »

Print this post

Leaders of US Senate Finance Committee Introduce Bill for Increasing Tax Incentives for Alternative-Energy Vehicles

1 March 2006

The Republican chairman and Democrat ranking member of the US Senate Finance Committee introduced legislation to increase significantly tax incentives for business owners who buy fuel-efficient alternative-energy vehicles—just as they now receive incentives for the purchase of SUVs.

If enacted, the bill, introduced by Senators Chuck Grassley and Max Baucus, would represent the biggest incentives for the business purchase of alternative energy vehicles ever to emerge from the Finance Committee.

The alternative energy vehicles include electric cars; hybrid cars; and vehicles that run entirely on alternative fuel such as compressed natural gas.

The tax code shouldn’t favor SUVs over alternative energy cars for business owners. Some business owners will want to use SUVs and some will want to use hybrid cars. The choice should be theirs and the tax code should be consistent. The purchase of either kind of vehicle will help business growth, especially for small businesses, which create most of the nation’s jobs.

—Chairman Grassley

At a time when America needs to shake its oil addiction, Congress needs to do all it can to encourage the purchase and use of alternative fuel vehicles. America’s small business owners are looking for ways to reduce their energy consumption and costs, and the tax code should provide benefits for those who can choose and use clean, lean alternative-fuel vehicles.

—Senator Baucus

Grassley and Baucus’ bill, the America’s Business Choice (ABC) Act, exempts passenger vehicles eligible for the alternative motor vehicle credit and the credit for qualified electric vehicles from the limitation on depreciation for luxury automobiles.

Under current depreciation rules, a business owner who buys an SUV gets a deduction for the depreciation not subject to the limitation for luxury automobiles. The Grassley-Baucus bill will provide the same depreciation deductions for business owners who buy alternative energy vehicles.

In addition, the Grassley-Baucus bill allows small business owners to use the tax benefit of expensing of up to $100,000 for their alternative energy vehicles. Under current law, business owners have not been able to use expensing if they purchased a passenger vehicle that costs more than $10,585 (adjusted for inflation to $14,800 for 2005 purchases).

March 1, 2006 in Electric (Battery), Hybrids, Natural Gas, Policy | Permalink | Comments (6) | TrackBack (0)

Comments

Well, it's progress anyway. Maybe we can expand tax credits for green activity under the GOP administration, and remove tax credits for polluting activity under the upcoming Dem administration.

Posted by: stomv | March 02, 2006 at 04:17 AM

So, I have a vehicle that gets good gas mileage, but is not an alternative vehicle, I am still discriminated against, versus SUVs. Why the hell there were special rules for SUVs in the first place is outraqeous.

Posted by: t | March 02, 2006 at 06:03 AM

The original bill that favors purchase of (big) SUV fails to answer one thing. How about the (small) business that never takes advantage of (big)SUV?

It is merely a bill that favors the following parties:
1.) (big) SUV manufacturers only
2.) Gasoline / diesel companies only

at the expenses of the following:
1.) Health(such as Air Quality) (Every American!)
2.) Lives of American Troops in Iraq (Our friends or even families)
3.) Small businesses never in need of (big)SUV

Posted by: Alfred | March 02, 2006 at 10:25 AM

In the list of those benefiting, you forgot to list small and large businesses that use large vehicles.

But I think that ALL vehicles which are 100% business use should be 100% dedutable. Or at the very least they should remove the mileage and price caps on the ~$0.37/mile deduction for business vehicles under 6000Lbs. If one drive 100,000 miles/year on business, one should be able to write it ALL off.

Posted by: Ash | March 02, 2006 at 05:47 PM

Businesses whose vehicles average 100,000 miles/yr need an incentive to use more efficient vehicles. Lugging around a 6 liter engine when a less than 3 liter engine could do the job should not be subsidised by all other taxpayers.

Posted by: tom deplume | March 03, 2006 at 07:01 AM

The sooner we clear out all that unskilled Labor(Lawyers) in Congress and repair the Damage done to America,the better.
This is getting worse by the Minute,this fat Riff Raff needs to be culled asap.
No more corporate welfare!!!!!

Posted by: HHN | April 02, 2006 at 10:06 AM

Post a comment
[Please keep comments on topic. Disagreement is fine; insults, abuse or wild diversions are not. Comments not meeting those standards will be deleted. Abuse of another commenter’s email address will result in the banning of the offender from this site. In an attempt to prevent the posting of insulting and abusive comments, this site maintains a list of prohibited words and phrases, which, unfortunately, grows with time. Including one of the prohibited words or phrases will flag the comment as “spam”, and it will be blocked.]

Green Car Congress only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00d834b0edd569e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Leaders of US Senate Finance Committee Introduce Bill for Increasing Tax Incentives for Alternative-Energy Vehicles:

Green Car Congress © 2009 BioAge Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Home | BioAge Group