Green Fleet Expo in Toronto
Honda CEO: New Hybrid and Clean Diesel Vehicles in US and Canada by 2010

GM to Introduce 4th-Generation Corsa in July

The new Corsa.

GM will introduce its redesigned Opel/Vauxhall Corsa at the British International Motor Show (18 – 30 July) in London. The fourth generation of this popular small car, which has sold more than 9.4 million units in Europe alone since 1982, will be available at dealerships in October 2006.

The new Corsa will offer five engines initially. Gasoline options include 1.0-, 1.2- and 1.4-liter models. On the diesel side, GM will offer its award-winning 1.3-liter CDTi unit, while the flagship will be an all-new 123 hp (92 kW) 1.7-liter CDTi with standard diesel particulate filter (DPF). The DPF is also optional on the 1.3-liter model.

Compared to the current Corsa, GM is initially dropping the current 1.8-liter gasoline engine, which, unlike its other three counterparts, was not a Twinport engine. Twinport engines use a variable intake system and high rates of exhaust gas recirculation to reduce fuel consumption.

The current Corsa models (gasoline and diesel) offer fuel economies ranging from 44 mpg US to 52 mpg US combined. GM will announce prices and specifications for the new Corsa closer to launch.

Corsa has become what some call an “accidental” world car. The small car is sold in approximately 80 countries and manufactured in 16 plants on five continents.


Rafael Seidl

Just goes to show that GM is quite capable of producing fuel-efficient cars in very large numbers and marketing them internationally.

The reason they are not available in the US is because GM rightly concluded there was no market for them there. Gas is simply too cheap (yes, you read that right) over there for such a radical shift toward smaller, lighter cars. The recent decline in SUV sales in favor of cars is welcome, but it's a very gradual process that will reverse the minute oil prices go down again, as they most likely will at some point.

The real question is: are US consumers prepared to change their mind about "bigger is better" for the benefit of the environment and the energy security of their children, regardless of gas prices? So far, for the majority, the answer appears to be a firm NO.



Wouldn't it be more fun to blame big business than to take responsibility for our own actions?

I get a good chuckle at the people on this site that have tried to tell me the american masses are just dying for a fuel miser with a 1.2L engine, but GM/Ford/Mopar won't give it to them because of Big Oil or whatever the scapegoat is that day. You are right. Gas is too cheap. Anytime it competes with something else it loses. Safety, horsepower, status, versatility(SUVs), and emissions. Gas loses everytime. I keep saying this because if you want to change a behavior you are best off understanding what causes it.




RS -- JROD : Good commets, both of them. With all the competition in this area (Hybrids, EV's, E85, Bio-Diesel, Oil Sands, DME, CTL, GTL, BTL, CNG, LNG, etc, ect !!!!) I am sure we will see $1 a gallon gas again sometime in the future and that's too bad because gas is too cheap and the cheaper it is the more dependent we become. There has gotta be a way to break the vicious circle and move beyond carbon based fuels. Without pointing the finger and blaming big business or comsumers -- you got any ideas on how to proceed??


I agree with both previous posters. Low gas prices is why the attempt at conservation thru CAFE has succeeded only in exacerbating our problem. I am for a policy goal of REPLACEMENT of fossil fuels with renewables. This too, cannot be a viable strategy until we INCREASE THE COST OF PETROLEUM thru tax policy. This could be done in tandem with an individual and corporate tax decrease (and compensatory payments to the 40% or so who pay no taxes), such that gas prices would cause each household's decision-making framework to change.

Then, diesels would be desirable in the USA.


Actauly the problem isnt quite that simple. Basicaly everyone who asks for a small car wont actauly buy one from gm. Gm tested this several times and even sold the exact same model made in the exact same factory as a forein car and both car critics as well as american cunsumer dolts .. mostly young and baby boomers panned the gm car but loved the forien one...

The BIGOTRY was so strong the car makers simply had to give up and wait for the moron generation to make way for hopefully a smarter gen of people..

And yes I just called everyone from 25 to 60 a freaking damn moron.


While I would support a tax as Corndog suggests, it is not likely to happen -- unless the national security crowd can make the case we need to get off the oil additiciton. That will be a tough sell.

Gasoline will never see $1 again. Between constricted refinery capacity, increased global auto sales, and depletion, prices will rise, or at least stay above current levels. If the cars become more efficient and oil companies sell less product, they need to maintain a high price to keep profits up. This is not an efficient market. But that may be good. It provides incentives for competition from renewables and better technology.

Rafael Seidl

Europeans are of course hardly saints wrt exploiting foreign resources by way of military force, but at least we learnt the lessons of our blody history. Gasoline does now cost $6+/gallon, and disesl is not much cheaper. For us, a four-cylinder engine is the overwhelming norm, six or more are only found in premium cars. Average vehicle weight is perhaps 300-400 lbs less than in the US. In particular, full-size pickups and SUVs are extremely rare. Would people here buy them if gas were as cheap here as it is in the US? Of course they would! But it isn't and that is why they don't.

Ergo: a coherent US energy policy should reward consumers for behaving in ways that reduce national exposure to energy security and climate change risks. By far the simplest way to do that is to shift the tax burden from direct to indirect taxes, without increasing the total tax take. That means increasing the income tax credits (applied to the tax amount, not the income) available to all.

It also means imposing taxes on CO2 production from all technical combustion processes, i.e. not for biogenic CO2.

In addition, a national energy security duty should be levied on imports of crude oil from selected countries. Note that every oil reservoir in the world has a characteristic chemcial composition, so its source can be pinpointed by analysis. To avoid creating a loophole, the import of refinery products should also be subject to higher duties unless the importer can prove to the authorities' satisfaction that the goods were derived from exempt sources.

To avoid undue asset depreciation, these three measures should be announced at least a year prior to introduction and the cutover should happen gradually and predictably over at least seven years, longer for sectors with long-term investments. None of this is easy, but now would be a good time (for the Democrats) to start.

Lou Grinzo

What in the world will it take to convince GM to bring a car like this to the US??? It drives me absolutely nuts that they think the US and non-US markets are far more different than they really are.

Look at the sales in the US of Civics, xA's, Fits, Yarises (Yari?), etc. GM could move some a serious number of units and do wonders for their image in the US.


GM should immediately be sold to a foreign corporation, say Honda or Toyota. Then all their cars would be "foreign" cars. I know thier is a bias but isn't some of this based on experience and reliability statistics?


"energy security duty should be levied on imports of crude oil from selected countries"

It doesn't really matter which country we import our oil from. If we decide to only buy oil from south america, it just frees up middle east oil on the global market. Prices will stay high, unstable countries will continue to take in very high profits, and oil consumption will not change.


wintermane - It's not that simple. Automotive diesels have a bad rep in the US because of something that GM did. Twenty or so years ago, GM took gasoline designed engines and converted them to diesel. They were not sufficently modified to cope with the increased compression, etc. Anyone who bought one, also bought a lot of grief. My Lawyer friend an Neighbor bought two. I saw what he went through. I also saw what another neighbor went through with a new Buick that spent more time in the shop than in her garage. Ditto for a friend with a new Corvette.

My conviction that GM was selling junk came from these first-hand observations. It looks like a lot of others arrived at the same conclusion.

GM's neglience earned them a much deserved bad reperation.

As you sow, so shall you reap.


"reputation" !!!

Regardless an "award-winning" 1.3CDTi(or more?) would move a lot of iron in the inventory and sell briskly too. EPA, how bout a miniscule temporary "bump" in NOx regs to get some of these 40-60+ mpg cars on the road. They already easily surpass every other reg now that ULSD is FINALLY making it to the retail pump.


Finally, two articles saying that Honda and GM are bringing diesels to the USA market. With the new diesel regs for 2007 and 2010, these cars will be much, much cleaner and reduce CO2 emissions in the process.

For all the people doubting the new clean diesel technology, it is real and it works. I deal with testing it every day at my job with a large diesel engine manufacturer. I just hope enough people here give the new diesel tech that is coming a chance. It really is a new era for the diesels that are coming.

Roger Pham

jj, to answer your question about how to prevent gasoline from going down in price to ~$1.00 level again...the answer lies in the US government setting a minimum price for retail gasoline, say, at $2.50/gallon unleaded regular. Anytime the gas price dip below that miminum set level, federal gas tax will increase just enough and just long enough to bring the retail gas price back to the set level of $2.50. Then, with the gas prices going up on its own, then the federal gas tax will go back down to current level.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)