Shell Canada Proposes Expansion of Athabasca Oil Sands Project
SIAM Proposing Testing for CNG-Hydrogen Vehicles in New Delhi

California ARB Awards Grants for Three Hydrogen Stations; Selects a Range of Hydrogen Vehicles

The California Air Resources Board is awarding grants to three proposals for new Hydrogen Highway fueling stations in California.

The demonstration stations, the first to be co-funded by California, will help build hydrogen infrastructure. Criteria for the stations include a 30% reduction in greenhouse gases and 20% use of renewable energy to produce and distribute the hydrogen. The criteria also require no increases in smog-forming emissions, compared to average gasoline vehicles and infrastructure.

The 50% co-funding was made available through legislation adopted in 2005 (Senate Bill 76).

The selected proposals include:

  • California State University, Los Angeles. The electrolyzer station will be located on the eastern edge of the college campus, utilize 100% renewable wind power and have over 60 kg of storage capacity.

  • Pacific Gas and Electric. The station will use steam methane reformation to generate 10 kg/day of hydrogen, use solar photovoltaic cells to supply the renewable energy component, and be co-located at the compressed natural gas fueling station in San Carlos, south of San Francisco.

  • San Diego City Schools. The 100% renewable electrolyzer station will be located off Interstate 15, adjacent to the new Thurgood Marshall Middle School and Alliant International University campuses in Scripps Ranch. The station will be powered by a 600 kW solar photovoltaic array to be installed at the middle school.

The next step in the grant process will be contract negotiation, followed by, outreach, permitting, site preparation, and construction. Station commissioning is likely in late 2007.

ARB also selected three hydrogen vehicle proposals for integration with state fleets or for placement with universities for evaluation and outreach. The selected proposals, which represent fuel-cell, hydrogen combustion engine (ICE) and hydrogen ICE-electric hybrid vehicles, include:

  • One hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicle (FCV) from General Motors;

  • Four Toyota Prius hybrid hydrogen/internal combustion engine passenger cars from Quantum;

  • Two hydrogen internal combustion engine shuttle buses from Ford.


tom deplume

I knew hydrogen wasn't a good idea but then I read a scientific study of the issue. It is much worse than I ever thought. Check out

Bike Commuter Dude

Tell me then, just what do we use after the baby boomers are all finished using up the petroleum, coal, and natural gas? There will be a limit to total biofuel input, and all of those things still release megatons of CO2, which will continue to hasten global warming. SO, eventually, all that shall remain are renewable solar energy souces (wind, solar, thermal). Once we are in such a position as to have 100% renewable power, by necessity, we will need hydrogen as a viable energetic currency.


You may wish we'd have used up all the coal ... but we won't. There's enough for a few hundred years. What we need is the will to use it as cleanly as possible. As for a viable energetic currency, hydrogen may have its uses, but electricity will be #1. Go Tesla Go.

Yes I Am A Rocket Scientist

Biofuels do not have a *net* release tons of C02. Growing the fuel consumes the same amount of C02 that burning it produces. Furthermore, besides all the painfully obvious technical issues with hydrogen, no one seems to be addressing the oxygen depletion issue. When fossil fuels are burned the atmospheric oxygen combines with carbon to form CO and CO2. Plant organisms can then sequester this and release oxygen back into the atmosphere. When hydrogen is burned, it bonds with oxygen to form water, permanently removing that oxygen from the ecosystem. Finally, a little known fact is that water vapor contributes from 36%-70% of the global warming effect, while carbon dioxide is at 9%-26%.

Yeah, hydrogen is a really great idea.


Electric cars are the way to go. Why bother with hydrogen and internal combustion engines...just so we can keep the bloated auto industry in place as it is now...cut out oil changes, timing belt replacements, valve adjustements, and a host of other activites that must be performed on a car/truck/sub.

Charge the cars with solar panels and you have a very sustainable system.

John Ard

If said electric vehicle could drive the 70 mile round-trip it takes for me to get to a decent grocery store and still make it around town for whatever errands, family reunions, emergencies, cook-outs and the like without subjecting me to a 6-hour charge time in between. Until then hydrogen, ethanol, butanol, biodiesel, and whatever other fuels that allow for a quick fill-up will be the choice of those rednecks like me who dwell outside the mystical land of Suburbia.


Rocket Scientist,

I have often wondered about two aspects of fosil fuel use that are never mentioned.

1) One is Oxygen depletion. If there is a higher concentration of CO2, then some free oxygen must be tied up in it. What's that impact?
2) Each year we are burning approximately 200 years worth of stored energy (according to The Weather Makers). Isn't that simple addition of energy within the atmosphere contributing to global warming as well?

It seems to me if we went to electric vehicles (or at least away from ICE, cities would not be the heat sinks they are today -- at least not as bad. The ICE generates heat and holds it concentrated in cities where the densest traffic is.


When EVs can meet the day-to-day needs of the average driver, they will sell. Until then, they'll stay a niche market.


If you are using renewable electricity to generate hydrogen from water, then you are also generating oxygen that is either released into the atmosphere or contained for use elsewhere, then eventually released in some form. I'm not sure what the balance looks like when you make the hydrogen from fossil sources, but that may be yet another good reason to not use fossil fuels as a source of hydrogen.


John Ard: This is why we will have PHEVs. Alternatively, we may just let you die out there in the mystical land beyond suburbia. Maybe you can use some of that miracle stuff, ethanol, and just stay drunk.

We have a choice. We can try to maintain what Kunstler calls motoring as usual or we can get serious and create something more closely resembling 1920 England or America. This monstrous planet rapist we like to call civilization has got to go.

What's wrong with having what they used to call a "station" in all but the littlest town where you get on a thing they used to call a "train" or a "bus" and ride into the city to do your errands.

Every scheme I've seen to maintain the status quo is a dead end. Those who think the alternative is just too painful have mostly not been to Europe or are too damn young to see what the world was like before automobiles were completely ubiquitous.

Rocket Scientist (not): Your analysis of ethanol is fine as far as it goes but it neglects the greenhouse emissions from the fossil fuels used to make the ethanol from planting to the seed corn through distillation to distribution. Also, consider the current worldwide grain shortages that are getting worse because of global warming, drowth, increased demand, and, yes, ethanol production. Higher food prices don't sound like a very good tradeoff to me.


3M. You are right.

The O2 in the atmosphere can be considered excess oxygen that hasn't found something to burn with (carbon, hydrogen, iron, etc.) Burning fossil fuel does reduce the O2 that is available. We burn food and exhale CO2 when we breathe.

Plants eventually put the oxygen back in the atmosphere.

So rapidly using enough fossil fuel would outrun the plants trying to release O2.

IC does heat cities a little. But the urban heat island effect is usually attributed to paving over huge areas, Paving material absorbs large amounts of solar energy then slowly releases it at night. Otherwise that unpaved land would support plants that actually cool. And even bare earth absorbs much less heat than concrete or asphalt.

The impacts are unknown but certainly not for lack of study or opinion or bias.

I remain undecided about whether the CO2 from human activity is significant in the total greenhouse effect. It does have some effect - but how much? There is a lot of other stuff out there - eater, methane, volcanic gases, and old Sol himself. The X-Files nailed it - the truth is also out there.


Wow this is the best idea I have ever seen

Let's all go into the DESERT and electrolyze water to fuel our vehicles. Since available drinking water is already hard to come by we should just go ahead and consume an additional 200billion gallons a year to create hydrogen for all the vehicles in the US...oh wait we don't have that much extra available potable water.


Conservation of mass and energy -

H20 + energy-> H2 + 02

H2 + 02 -> H20 + energy

Argue all you want about the efficiency and technical issues, the point is that oxygen sequestration is a non-issue.


"You may wish we'd have used up all the coal ... but we won't. There's enough for a few hundred years. "

Actually this is a common mistake. At present levels of consumption we have enough for hundreds of years however if the current increase of 2% continues then we have enough for approx 80 years.

If we start using it for everything power CTL etc, apart from increasing CO2 to really dangerous levels, we will reach Peak Coal in 2046. This means to get the remaining coal we will have to blow off every mountain top, strip mine every possible coal seam to get the rest.

Is it so hard to change driving habits?



Buying a PHEV represents a large financial burden. Consider someone who owns an SUV that gets 19mpg, but is totally paid off. A Prius might get much better mileage, but the monthly payments might not be affordable. And the housing boom of the past few years has made affordable housing very difficult to find close to work in many areas of the country. Just look at places like Temecula, California, about halfway between San Diego and Los Angeles.

So the answer is... yes, it's hard to change your driving habits when it entails a large financial burden.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)