« Survey: US Consumer Awareness of E85 Flex-Fuel Vehicles High, Buying Interest Split About 50:50 | Main | Qatar Petroleum and Shell Launch Integrated Pearl GTL Project »
IATA: Airlines Need Alternative Fuels
27 July 2006
International air passenger traffic grew 6.7% in the first half of 2006 compared to 2005, and international air freight traffic increased 5.2% over the same period, according to the International Air Transport Association (IATA). In June, the passenger load factor rose to 78.3%, more than 1.5 percentage points higher than June 2005.
Despite operational improvements and revenue growth, however, the airlines are still losing money mainly due to the spiraling cost of fuel.
The bottom line is all about oil. Prices continue at near record levels and we expect a fuel bill of US$112 billion this year at an average price of US$66 per barrel. Increased political instability in the Middle East does not bode well for a price drop any time soon. The good news is that neither the extraordinary price of oil nor the inching-up of interest rates negatively impacted demand.
Change is urgent and now is the time. Airline efficiency gains must be matched throughout the value chain. And we must find new ways of doing business. Airlines are leading the way by Simplifying the Business. The 100% conversion to e-ticketing by the end of 2007 is a great example. But we now look to the oil industry to move faster at developing alternative fuels to further improve efficiency and environmental performance.
—Giovanni Bisignani, IATA’s Director General and CEO
July 27, 2006 in Aviation, Fuels | Permalink | Comments (19) | TrackBack (0)
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00d834a5e1d053ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference IATA: Airlines Need Alternative Fuels:
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Twitter headlines
Heck, the USAF is testing synfuel for their aircraft. Formulated to JP-8, it is currenntly being made from natural gas. Eventually they want to move onto coal, and biomass.
_
___They are doing the testing on a B-52, since it has eight engines on 4 pods. It also has a fuel system thet allows specifictanks to feed specific engines. The test currently calls for 2 engines on one pod to be fueled with the experimental syn JP-8. The rest (6 on 3 pods) are run on conventional petro JP-8. In case of improper fuel behavior, accident, or malfunction the test fuel engines are shut down, and the aircraft flown home on the remaining regular fuel engines. They are testing for performance, and physical/chemical characteristics. One example would be gel point of the synfuel. It is lab result vs real world result.
Posted by: allen Z | July 27, 2006 at 07:26 AM
Because the airline industry is probably the industry most at risk from oil prices I would think that they should be setting up their own biofuel/syngas operations. When most other transportation becomes electrified, they will still be dependant on liquid fuels. I don't see much evidence of forward thinking on their part.
Posted by: marcus | July 27, 2006 at 08:58 AM
Since there are only 2 companies making jets, they should decide on particular fuel and then work on it.
What is the efficiency factor of syngas made from natural gas. Will it not be better if they use LNG, since jets are fueled just before take off and they finish most of the fuel in a trip leaving little wastage.
Posted by: Max Reid | July 27, 2006 at 09:44 AM
I ran into this graph on fuel costs by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics the other day. Price for a gallon of fuel went from $.85 in 2003 to $1.90 in 2006. Of course, I wish I could pay $1.90 for a gallon of gasoline at the pump. :)
Does anyone know what percentage of the total passenger miles flown in the world are consumed by Americans? The ICAO reported 3,442 billion passenger km in air travel in 2004 (from Vital Signs), but I don't know how much of that was consumed by the US. I would guess our 5% of the world population consumed around 30% of aircraft miles flow, but I don't know for sure.
Posted by: MH | July 27, 2006 at 01:39 PM
One problem is the fact that while jets like the Boeing 777 and 787 are efficient due to engines and aerodynamic refinement, there are many other jets out there with 80's era engines and less advanced wings and bodies.
Posted by: allen Z | July 27, 2006 at 02:00 PM
AvGas and jet fuel can be derived from biodiesel and ethanol. Why not use those?
Posted by: Mark R. W. Jr. | July 27, 2006 at 03:49 PM
How is biodiesel converted into a kerosene-like fuel? I haven't seen any info on that so far. I would imagine it's possible to make kerosene by hydrocracking plant and animal lipids and then traditional distillation, but there's no point making biodiesel first for that process.
Posted by: Erick | July 27, 2006 at 04:32 PM
I find it strange that IATA is blaming airline losses on fuel costs. Wouldn't it be more accurate to blame it on ticket prices being absurdly cheap - contributing to over usage, with the resulting impact on the environment.
Posted by: Mitra Ardron | July 27, 2006 at 04:50 PM
Well it seems for some reason that they aren't passing on the full fuel costs to the customer. However if they do, and then loose customers, its still a no win situation. Perhaps they would rather have full planes while loosing money than have half empty planes while loosing money. Why?
Posted by: marcus | July 27, 2006 at 06:10 PM
Why is biodiesel being looked at? Isn't it expensive to process it so it does not turn into gel up at 30,000 feet?
There is a thread on biodieselnow.com where somebody asked why bother extracting the oil from algea? Why not just grow a hearty strain like spirulina and just FT the resulting biomass?
Is running biomass throught the FT process that much more expensive and complicated than getting biodiesel to not gel up in the flight levels?
Inquiring minds want to know:)
Posted by: Scott | July 28, 2006 at 01:33 AM
I think FT is a very energy intensive process. But people have managed to make biodiesel work in jets at low temperatures. Richard Branson says he intends to wean his fleet off crude oil and onto biodiesel as soon as he can. He'd save a packet on his fuel bill too.
Posted by: clett | July 28, 2006 at 02:20 AM
Id bet warm bioD >20%(heated wings? oh wait theyve got those) would do. Maybe even get better mileage? at cruz alt? Kero, JetA, BioD...not impossible?
Posted by: fred | July 28, 2006 at 03:24 AM
There are several organizations, academic, military and civil, looking at blends of Biofuel with Jet A or ways to overcome the gelling issue of biofuels. See http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/12_09a/briefs/191664-1.html
Fred: The entire wings of jets are not heated, just the leading edges and engine intakes to prevent icing, and only used under certain conditions (like in clouds and/or within a certain temperature range) as the heating (bleed-air) obviously consumes more fuel.
Perhaps we should bring back Concorde. Flying supersonically the aircraft skin would actually get quite hot, and the fuel was used as a coolant, thus no gelling issues there!
Posted by: Floatplane | July 28, 2006 at 12:14 PM
Floatplane:
Communicate your idea to Branston's Virgin Galactic. He would like it.
Posted by: Andrey | July 29, 2006 at 01:52 AM
Folks,
Y'all have overlooked the obvious. LH2 (Liquid Hydrogen) is the answer. The plane will have half the gross takeoff weight for a given payload, and will consume 45% less BTU worth of fuel, given the fact that LH2 is 3 times lighter per BTU value than kerosene. If LH2 can be made at comparable price as kerosene for a give BTU value, then there will be saving in fuel cost. Since the planes will be lighter and will use smaller engines for a given payload, expect lower overall amortization cost and operating cost. The fuel tank will be 1.75 times larger, but since the internal fuel volume of a long-range jumbojet is but 1/10th of overall usable fuselage volume, even doubling this fuel volume would not be any big deal.
Posted by: Roger Pham | July 29, 2006 at 06:49 PM
You need bulky and heavy insulation on that LH2 tank.
Posted by: j | August 01, 2006 at 02:09 PM
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
National Algae Association
4747 Research Forest Dr., Suite 180
The Woodlands, Texas 77381
cecore@aol.com
National Algae Association, The Woodlands, Texas
(February 1, 2008)
Announces the opening of its new headquarters serving all areas of the Algae industry.
Algae researchers and producers can come together to exchange ideas concerning the latest developments in Algae production and the products made from Algae. The Association provides an open exchange forum for the publishing of technical papers and the announcement of the results of research into the latest Algae related technologies. The Association also supports discussion and development of new markets that take advantage of the tremendous potential of Algae, not only as a source of renewable energy, but also in the exploration and development of other markets for algae products, such as cosmetics, pharmaceuticals and fertilizers.
For more information contact: cecore@aol.com or 936.321.1125
Posted by: bcohen | January 21, 2008 at 09:21 AM
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
National Algae Association
4747 Research Forest Dr., Suite 180
The Woodlands, Texas 77381
cecore@aol.com
National Algae Association, The Woodlands, Texas
(February 1, 2008)
Announces the opening of its new headquarters serving all areas of the Algae industry.
Algae researchers and producers can come together to exchange ideas concerning the latest developments in Algae production and the products made from Algae. The Association provides an open exchange forum for the publishing of technical papers and the announcement of the results of research into the latest Algae related technologies. The Association also supports discussion and development of new markets that take advantage of the tremendous potential of Algae, not only as a source of renewable energy, but also in the exploration and development of other markets for algae products, such as cosmetics, pharmaceuticals and fertilizers.
For more information contact: cecore@aol.com or 936.321.1125
Posted by: bcohen | January 21, 2008 at 09:27 AM
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
National Algae Association
4747 Research Forest Dr., Suite 180
The Woodlands, Texas 77381
cecore@aol.com
National Algae Association, The Woodlands, Texas
(February 1, 2008)
Announces the opening of its new headquarters serving all areas of the Algae industry.
Algae researchers and producers can come together to exchange ideas concerning the latest developments in Algae production and the products made from Algae. The Association provides an open exchange forum for the publishing of technical papers and the announcement of the results of research into the latest Algae related technologies. The Association also supports discussion and development of new markets that take advantage of the tremendous potential of Algae, not only as a source of renewable energy, but also in the exploration and development of other markets for algae products, such as cosmetics, pharmaceuticals and fertilizers.
For more information contact: cecore@aol.com or 936.321.1125
Posted by: bcohen | January 21, 2008 at 09:27 AM