Green Car Congress
About GCC Contact  RSS Subscribe Twitter headlines

« US Senators Introduce New Climate Change Bill | Main | Hino To Roll Out Dutro Hybrid Truck In Australia »

Print this post

GE’s Weight-Reducing Contributions to the Chevrolet Volt

14 January 2007

Geplastics
GE Plastics' contributions to the Volt. Click to enlarge.

GM’s new plug-in series hybrid concept car, the Chevrolet Volt (earlier post), relies heavily on resins and composite materials from GE Plastics to reduce its mass, allowing for even lower fuel consumption, fewer carbon dioxide emissions (when the range extender engine is in use), and improved overall performance.

GreenOrder, an environmental strategy firm based in New York, NY, that audited GM’s claims for the Volt, validated that if 3.2 million passenger vehicles weighing 3,500 pounds each were manufactured making the same use of GE Plastics’ weight-reducing components, the decrease in fuel consumption would save more than 20 million gallons (476,000 barrels) of oil each year. That decrease would reduce greenhouse gas emissions by more than 194,000 tons each year.

GE fuel-saving technologies showcased on the Chevy Volt include:

  • Doors and hood made with Xenoy iQ high performance thermoplastic composites (HPPC). Xenoy iQ resins are created with polybutylene terephthalate (PBT)-based polymers derived from 85% post-consumer plastic waste, consuming less energy and yielding less carbon dioxide (CO2) in their manufacturing than traditional resins.

  • Roof, rear deck lid and fixed side glazing made with Lexan GLX resins and Exatec coating technology. (Exatec was founded in 1998 as 50:50 joint venture of Bayer Material Science and GE Plastics to develop polycarbonate glazing systems for the automotive market.)

  • Global energy absorber and hybrid rear energy absorbers with Xenoy iQ resins.

  • Steering wheel and instrument panel with integrated airbag chute made with Lexan EXL resins.

  • Front fenders made with Noryl GTX resins.

  • Wire coating made with Flexible Noryl resins.

Composites are typically used in the aerospace industry and on racecars due to their super lightweight structure and performance. GE Plastics, in partnership with Azdel, Inc., premieres its own version of composites made with Xenoy iQ resins on the Volt doors and hood. (Azdel is a joint venture between GE Advanced Materials and PPG.) The composite addresses three critical environmental concerns: conserving energy, lowering greenhouse gas emissions, and up-cycling or regenerating post-consumer waste such as PET plastic bottles.

On the Volt, the fender, window glazings, instrument panel and steering wheel can each offer from 30 to 50 percent weight reduction per part. Wire running throughout the Volt is made from non-halogenated GE plastics and reaches an approximate 25 percent weight reduction compared to traditional wire in automobiles.

—Amanda Roble, executive director for GE Plastics’ Automotive business

Lexan polycarbonate is one of GE’s original plastics, first created in 1953. The plastic traveled to the moon with astronauts Armstrong and Aldrin in their helmet assemblies and visors. The Lexan GLX resin provides high impact strength, UV protection, and light weight—especially valuable in automotive glazing applications. The Lexan EXL resin offers superior impact and low temperature ductility compared to standard polycarbonate grades.

Just last week, it emerged that GE is looking to sell the plastics unit, seeking bids of as much as $10 billion, due in part to the impact rising costs for crude-oil based chemicals combined with the low price of the final product have on the bottom line.

Other factors prompting the exploration of the sale include the slowing automotive industry, and increased competition, especially from Asia, according to the Wall Street Journal (10 Jan 2007, p. B1). In the first nine months of last year, the plastics unit had $5 billion in revenue, and operating profit fell 13% from the prior year.

January 14, 2007 in Fuel Efficiency, Hybrids, Vehicle Systems | Permalink | Comments (38) | TrackBack (0)

Comments

I will believe that there is a 90 mpg Prius when I see one. That might have to do with talk about a plug Prius. If you get 45 mpg, but if half of the energy comes from batteries that you plug in, then it looks like you get 90 mpg. That is false accounting. A BTU is a BTU a killowatt hour is a killowatt hour, there is no changing the physics.

Posted by: SJC | January 15, 2007 at 09:18 AM

Please see calcars write up on the volt.felix Kramer is working with utilities and government agencies to try to speed its introduction to the fleet.

Posted by: earl | January 15, 2007 at 10:06 AM

1. The 50mpg of the volt is AFTER you expend the 40 mile all electric range. Essentially you will get 90mpg if you only drive 90 miles before you recharge which is equivalent to the theoretical Prius.
2. Why is it that when someone speaks of saving a 1/2 pound of weight, and using less energy in the manufacture of a component someone thinks that the idea is garbage? It isn't good enough so you wouldn't do it at all? That line of thinking is garbage.
3. Typical glass on a compact is around 250lbs total. If they save 30-50% of the weight that is a 75-125 lb weight savings (34-57kg). The fenders would probably only save around 10-15 lbs (4.5-7kg).

Posted by: Patrick | January 15, 2007 at 10:46 AM

BBM,
Regarding your comment that the Volt is designed to accept various removable "electrical generators" as range extender, any genset can be designed to have the engine torque clutched to the engine when it is desirable, and still can be removable.

Just drop the genset into a rail or groove on one side of the engine compartment, while the electric motor sits opposite to the genset. A hydraulic or mechanical mechanism can be designed to move a clutch plate (splined to the engine shaft) a short distance from the engine to the clutch plate of the motor for reversible torque coupling of the engine to the motor. At rest, the engine is not coupled to the motor,so the entire genset can be removed. No gear whatsoever is needed to connect the engine to the motor, just direct drive via clutch plates.

Even a removable fuelcell genset can be used. The removable fuelcell genset would be of 30kw max power rating and has a 30kw motor built in to the genset to supplement the power of the 80kw motor. When this genset is dropped into the grove in the engine bay and secured, then the torque of the 30kw motor will be locked via a manual mechanism to the 80kw motor of the engine to give a total of 130 kw power output.

A turbine engine genset is not recommended due to the poor efficiency of the microturbine.

Since battery is heavy and expensive and costing ~$500-$1000 USD/kw, it is always good to have an engine costing $3000 onboard to assure that you won't get stranded when the battery is out of juice, not to mention saving of ~$10,000 from battery and electric component down-sizing, and saving of hundreds of lbs of vehicle weight! In winter, the engine or FC genset provides waste heat for cabin heating.

Posted by: Roger Pham | January 15, 2007 at 12:43 PM

So in order to fit Roger's model, even fuel-cell gensets would require a motor of their own (duplication of motors, their expense and their gearing) just so that they could add torque to an undersized main motor.  And they'd be stuck with the form factor and mechanical arrangement of a soon-to-be-obsolete system, when electric motors are already much more powerful than engines while being cheaper.

C'mon, get real.

Posted by: Engineer-Poet | January 15, 2007 at 06:29 PM

Maybe what Earl is refering to is this:

http://www.calcars.org/gm-phevs-faq.html

The author is a bit over the top about the government's role, given the supply side market types. But he does credit Dr. Andy Frank of U.C. Davis with being the father of the modern PHEV. I think that is correct.

Posted by: SJC | January 16, 2007 at 07:33 AM

Eng-Poet,
The 30kw motor in the FC genset is an additional souce of mechanical power to the wheel, and not a duplication. This additional power is entirely optional, not required for the functioning of the car. It is intended for those wanting more Vroom in their humdrum routine, or to satisfy the occasional "need for speed."

Face it, a PHEV is more economical to purchase than a pure BEV and do not suffer from the lack of range issue of a BEV. An ICE or FC genset can supply free waste heat for winter operation, or serve as an electrical backup for your home during a winter-storm power outage, which may last for weeks and cause a lot of suffering. It'll allow you to live normal life when your neighbors are freezing due to the lack of central heating, because the central heater is operated by electric motor. :)

Posted by: Roger Pham | January 17, 2007 at 11:13 PM

The problem with weight reduction emerges when you consider collision with a heavier vehicle. Even if you light vehicle is quite strong, the energy from the larger mass vehicle is transferred to you in either crush or change of vector. Either way, the collision within the vehicle between you and your surroundings goes up. Say you get "T" boned and you are knocked over a cliff rather than remaining on the road if your vehicle was heavier. And there may be a safety connection between weight and velocity. Say under 40 MPH, decreasing the weight does not significantly affect stability, but over 60 MPH, you need to weigh at least 2500 lbs. I do not know if this is true, but it would not surprise me based on watching race cars go airborne.

Posted by: Van | January 20, 2007 at 01:35 PM

Van,
Yes, your energy in a lighter composite vehicle will get changed into motion along a different vector. So? Read the "Pre-Astronauts" which talks about the ability of humans to survive high acceleration if properly restrained. John Paul Stapp led this work for Air Force jet pilot bailout. Watch some more of those races. The cars might fly up in the air in a wreck, but the drivers often walk away. How often do you drive that fast? How often do you drive next to a cliff? If you get "T" boned, then you will survive better in a carbon fiber vehicle than in a steel body vehicle. Carbon fiber is stronger than steel. That's why those race car drivers walk away. If cost can be reduced more, then lighter weight plastics or composites are better.

SJC
So you don't believe Toyota is going to get 90 mpg in the near future. Healthy sketicism. OK. I own a Prius and get close to 50 mpg in winter and closer to 55 in the summer, 50 to 55 mpg. This is because of my commute and driving habits. Most will get 45 to 50 mpg. I see this when in a hurry, with a lot of stop and start driving in town. My momentum is being converted to heat in the brakes because regenerative braking is not that strong. Also, the engine rpm audibly varies. These are sources of obvious inefficiences that are easier to improve in a Series PHEV. I said 70 mpg above. Lets be more conservative and say 60 mpg. That should be even easier to do. It's still better than 50 mpg!
As to the false accounting of using all-electric for the first 40 miles. Wind, nuclear, solar, wave, tidal, and geothermal are all dropping in price and can all provide clean energy. All except nuclear are renewable. Add to that studies that have shown PHEVs and EVs will be useful energy storage for intermittent renewables and you have an industrial revolution in the making. Wind is competitive with gas generated electricity now and still getting cheaper. Wave power will be cheaper than wind in some coastal areas. Solar will bypass both in the not too distant future.
http://www.alternet.org/story/45020/ (Good interview with Travis Bradford, author of “The Solar Revolution")
In the 1970s we got a good portion of our electricity from oil. In the last 30 years the oil part has changed over largely to natural gas and nuclear. In the next 30 we will be using more renewables and/or nuclear AND electricity will get cheaper. ...so...if we're driving a lot of PHEVs and EVs by then... You can help this happen faster, but you can't stop it. It is already happening. Is the Prius selling well? What about a lower cost PHEV with even better mpg? Stuff shot! Prius will become the space shuttle of hybrid technology. Wonderous in its' time, but no longer cost competitive with newer designs.

GM needs to get the "Volt" into production fast!

Posted by: mds | January 28, 2007 at 10:36 AM

“ On your terms” means customizing the available materials CPod has to offer to my needs, my attension span, my life style. You are absolutely right that this“ learner- centric” model is increasing in other industries. I have commented before regarding this issue, but as a practicing physician, I must continuously keep my medical knowledge up- to- date; it’ s a challenge to fit that knowledge acquisition into my hectic life. Services such as www. cmedownload. com was created with flexibility in mind (it’ s...

Posted by: http://www.overweightchild.org | March 23, 2008 at 05:39 AM

Enter your search terms Web www. joiz. org Submit search form Commercial Break Other Headlines Mini Blurbs from Twitter It's all drawn out. there's nothing inside and nothing to hold, nothing to find. Its wearing' me out, this feeling inside. I'm all drawn out 19 hrs ago More updates... Featured Entre! Bathroom Break Recent Ramblings Still Dadum! Terrible Two’ s! Ink Blots Concerts and Music Videos Drinking Lessons Single Ole! Entre! My List of Wants Maroon 5 and Incubus A Bit for the New Year Miserably...

Posted by: overweight teens | April 19, 2008 at 06:46 AM

simple :
1-use flat tire . save 50lbs (don't need spare tire any more ) and other stuff. and we have more space
2-use more plastic where don't need steel.

Posted by: | October 07, 2008 at 07:32 PM

LATIFGZGGDGKFDJD

Posted by: | October 18, 2008 at 02:15 AM

Post a comment
[Please keep comments on topic. Disagreement is fine; insults, abuse or wild diversions are not. Comments not meeting those standards will be deleted. Abuse of another commenter’s email address will result in the banning of the offender from this site. In an attempt to prevent the posting of insulting and abusive comments, this site maintains a list of prohibited words and phrases, which, unfortunately, grows with time. Including one of the prohibited words or phrases will flag the comment as “spam”, and it will be blocked.]

Green Car Congress only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00d834dad55c53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference GE’s Weight-Reducing Contributions to the Chevrolet Volt:

Green Car Congress © 2009 BioAge Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Home | BioAge Group