Green Car Congress
About GCC Contact  RSS Subscribe Twitter headlines

« EU Energy Ministers Endorse 10% Biofuels Target | Main | New Indian Company to Target Entry-Level Market With Diesels »

Print this post

E85 Fueling Infrastructure Development in US May Hit Bumps

18 February 2007

Development of a more wide-spread E85 refueling infrastructure is fundamental to any wider-spread usage of the 85% ethanol blend, and the National Ethanol Vehicle Coalition (NEVC) has established continued funding for E85 infrastructure as its highest legislative priority.

However, in an update to its members, the NEVC noted that it has been advised that it is “unlikely” that the Department of Energy will make any grants during calendar year 2007 to build additional E85 stations.

During Sept. 2006, DOE issued $5.4 million in grants which are intended to build an additional 168 stations. This program was apparently financed by using both FY 06 and 07 funding. Unfortunately, DOE has also indicated they will be unable to provide NEVC funds to make E85 infrastructure grants.

NEVC says that it is negotiating with DOE officials in an attempt to receive up to an additional $800,000 to continue to provide E85 technical support, and is urging support for the bills currently in Congress that would provide more support for infrastructure build-out.

Funds available for spending by NEVC in 2007 are approximately half of the amount available in 2006, due to a reduction in federal support from what the organization had anticipated. As a result, the organization said, it is unlikely it will be able to provide grants to assist with building new E85 stations at this point.

Nor is there good news about UL certification of an E85 fueling system. In October 2006, Underwriters Laboratories suspended the authorization to use UL Markings (Listing or Recognition) on components for fuel dispensing devices that specifically reference compatibility with alcohol-blended fuels that contain greater than 15% alcohol—e.g., E85. Fuel dispenser components as they relate to use with traditional fuel blends (e.g., E15 or less) were unaffected by this decision. (Earlier post.)

Insurance companies and local fire marshals generally require the use of “listed” equipment as a condition of coverage or code-compliance. The suspension by UL doesn’t put an immediate end to E85 sales, but it definitely complicates the picture.

Although UL had indicated that initial materials compatibility testing was to have begun sometime in mid-December, 2006, local building codes are going to require structural changes be made to the testing facilities prior to the start of such E85 equipment testing, according to the NEVC.

At this point, the NEVC is:

not optimistic we will have any form of UL certification prior to the second quarter of 2008. We are hopeful this schedule can be advanced; however, much work remains to be accomplished.

February 18, 2007 in Ethanol, Infrastructure | Permalink | Comments (30) | TrackBack (0)

Comments

GOAL - good points. BTW, doesn't Brazil run nearly all their transport on E85 these days? Golly, how do the DO it?

Posted by: gr | February 20, 2007 at 01:00 PM

Full lifecycle assessments of biobutanol vs. bioethanol suggest biobutanol is not as ecologically sustainable, despite its appeal as noted by Engineer-Poet. Similarly, while many of you make valid points about corn-based ethanol, your comments may be less valid when you think about cellulosic ethanol, which delivers more green house gas reductions while simultaneously eliminating the food vs. fuel debate - cellulosic ethanol will come from waste feedstocks (wheat straw, corn stover, wood residues). Win-win-win.

Posted by: Nadim | February 20, 2007 at 04:12 PM

How does Brazil do it? The answer comes courtesy of Robert Rapier:
"Warning: Reality Check Ahead

According to Per Capita Oil Consumption and Production, oil consumption in Brazil is 4.2 barrels per person per year. In the U.S., oil consumption is 27 barrels per person per year, 6.4 times as much per person as Brazil's.

However, we do produce much more oil per person than Brazil. Each year the U.S. produces 11 barrels per person, compared to 3.35 barrels per person for Brazil. In order to achieve energy independence, the gap between demand and production must be closed. Brazil has to close a gap of 0.85 barrels per person per year (4.2 - 3.35). They produce sufficient ethanol to close this gap, and therefore they are energy independent. The U.S., on the other hand, has to close a gap of 16 barrels per person per year. The U.S. gap in production/demand is almost 19 times greater than the production/demand gap in Brazil.

Clearly, the U.S. has quite a large gap to close. But this is a difficult proposition. Not only do we use more energy per person, but the population of the U.S. is 110 million greater than that of Brazil. According to my calculations, we can't possibly hope to close the production/demand gap with grain ethanol. Others have shown the futility of closing that gap with cellulosic ethanol here and here."

Note: According to RR's numbers Brazil supply only ~20% (0.85/4.2) of their "oil" consumption from ethanol.

Golly, no silver bullet, is it?

Posted by: An Engineer | February 20, 2007 at 04:34 PM

''BTW, doesn't Brazil run nearly all their transport on E85 these days? Golly, how do the DO it?''

By chopping down huge areas of rain forrest to grow sugar cane.

Posted by: James | February 21, 2007 at 05:18 AM

No, they actually do it with petroleum diesel.  Brazil's fuel usage is tilted much more toward commercial trucks than passenger cars, unlike the USA.

Posted by: Engineer-Poet | February 25, 2007 at 09:12 AM

Post a comment
[Please keep comments on topic. Disagreement is fine; insults, abuse or wild diversions are not. Comments not meeting those standards will be deleted. Abuse of another commenter’s email address will result in the banning of the offender from this site. In an attempt to prevent the posting of insulting and abusive comments, this site maintains a list of prohibited words and phrases, which, unfortunately, grows with time. Including one of the prohibited words or phrases will flag the comment as “spam”, and it will be blocked.]

Green Car Congress only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00d8352fe72169e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference E85 Fueling Infrastructure Development in US May Hit Bumps:

Green Car Congress © 2009 BioAge Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Home | BioAge Group