« Honda To Spend US$165M On Greening North American Coating Plants | Main | Delphi Increasing Fuel Handling and Injection System Development to Support Biofuels »
Under New EPA MPG Method, All Estimates Drop; Hybrids Retain Most of Their Advantage Relative to Conventional
26 February 2007
The EPA has published estimates of the affect of the revised methods for estimating vehicle fuel economy—which apply to model year 2008 and later vehicles—on earlier model year cars as a way to educate consumers on the likely impact of the changes.
Compared to today’s estimates, the city mpg estimates for the manufacturers of most vehicles will drop by about 12% on average, and by as much as 30% for some vehicles. The highway mpg estimates will drop on average by about 8%, and by as much as 25% for some vehicles. (Earlier post.)
Although the fuel economy estimates for hybrids drop along will those for all vehicles, hybrids appear to retain the majority of their fuel economy advantage compared to their conventional counterparts.
While the combined mpg estimate for the 2007 Camry hybrid, for example, drops 13% from 39 mpg under the old method to 34 mpg under the new, the hybrid’s efficiency advantage compared to its conventional cousin only decreases 3 percentage points from 39% to 36%.
The 2007 Prius, with no conventional model for comparison, would take a 16% hit in combined fuel economy under the new method, dropping from 55 mpg to 46 mpg. Its city driving score suffers the most, dropping 20% form 60 mpg under the old method to 48 mpg under the new. Highway driving drops 12% from 51 mpg to 45 mpg.
The new EPA methods include the city and highway tests used for previous models along with additional tests to represent faster speeds and acceleration; air conditioner use; and colder outside temperature. MPG estimates will also be adjusted downward to account for factors that are difficult to replicate in a laboratory, such as wind and road surface resistance.
EPA has put a comparison tool on its Fuel Economy site to allow consumers to see an estimated outcome of the new method on older vehicles.
February 26, 2007 in Fuel Efficiency, Hybrids | Permalink | Comments (28) | TrackBack (0)
Comments
Posted by: Patrick | February 27, 2007 at 12:53 PM
Patrick:
Thanks for the suggestions. I imagine 45 to 50 mph is the ideal speed for maximum fuel economy.
However, when the speed limit reads 30 mph, some townie police officer won't care what the ideal speed is for fuel economy. So, I will continue to drive 35 mph in a 30 mph zone.
Posted by: David | February 27, 2007 at 08:20 PM
I'm sure you meant you will continue to drive 30 in a 30 zone.
I push the envelope and drive 32-35 in a 30 unless it is a residential area where safety trumps my desire for increased fuel efficiency.
Posted by: Patrick | February 28, 2007 at 12:23 PM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00d834632a1569e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Under New EPA MPG Method, All Estimates Drop; Hybrids Retain Most of Their Advantage Relative to Conventional:

Twitter headlines

David,
Unless you have ALL Electric powered accessories (power steering, a/c, etc) then 30mph will be LESS efficient than 35mph.
The accessories take nearly a set amount of work to drive. A slight difference in rpm (maybe 100-200 rpm greater in top gear for 35mph versus 30mph) will not cause enough friction to increase the consumption from accessories a measurable amount. Given that the additional aerodynamic resistance at those speeds are negligible you use close to the same amount of fuel to travel at 35mph versus 30mph EXCEPT you cover more distance on the same amount of fuel. Somewhere around 45-50mph is the ideal speed for maximum fuel economy.
In fact, if you are in 4th gear at 30mph and 5th gear at 35mph (I would have to use those gears in my car to have minimal performance) you are probably going to be in a lower rpm at 35 than you would be at 30 (my car is).