« EPA Proposes More Stringent Emissions Rules for Small Nonroad and Marine Spark-Ignition Engines | Main | Mitsubishi to Move Up Market Introduction of Next-Generation Diesel »
EPA to Sponsor Low Global Warming Air-Conditioning Project
18 April 2007
The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will sponsor a demonstration project for R-152a, a refrigerant for mobile air conditioners with lower global warming potential (GWP) than R-134a.
Kristen Taddonio, EPA Strategic Climate Manager, made the announcement during the SAE World Congress in Detroit.
R-152a has a GWP of 120 which is about 94% less than R134a (GWP = 1,300). In addition to lower GWP, R-152a has better thermal efficiency. With improved thermal efficiency, a lower system charge may be used in a direct expansion system to achieve satisfactory cabin cooling.
The main drawback of R-152a is that it is flammable and thermally decomposes to highly toxic HF (Hydrogen Fluoride) if exposed to a glowing filament. In liquid form, it can be ignited with open flame and therefore may pose some hazard to occupants. If it is used in the cooling circuit in the cabin, a system using sensors and safety releases must be included to guard against unwanted discharge.
Participants in the EPA project include SAE, Delphi, GM, Ford, Volvo, Fiat, the Mobile A/C Society and NREL.
Resources:
April 18, 2007 in Brief | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00d8341d661953ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference EPA to Sponsor Low Global Warming Air-Conditioning Project:
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Twitter headlines
who has the patent on R152a?
Propane has a gwp of 20. Flammability and was the reason we have R134 instead. R134 is an inefficient refrigerant and should be eliminated as soon as practical.
Posted by: John Schreiber | April 18, 2007 at 08:35 PM
Hydrogen Flouride!?
Can anyone name a more dangerous substance?
JRod.
Posted by: JRod | April 18, 2007 at 11:08 PM
Depleted Uranium?
Posted by: Bike Commuter Dude | April 19, 2007 at 10:21 AM
Polonium-210. Ask the KGB for a Polo-tini!
Posted by: LochDhu | April 19, 2007 at 11:21 AM