« Saft Adds Lithium Iron Phosphate Technology to Line-up | Main | USDA Research Suggests the Amount of Corn Stover Available for Ethanol Production Must Be Reduced to Preserve Soil Quality »
Phoenix Motorcars and UQM to Develop Plug-In Series Hybrid Sport Utility Truck
25 April 2007
|
| The all-electric version of the Sport Utility Truck (SUT). |
Phoenix Motorcars and UQM Technologies will collaborate on the development of a plug-in series hybrid model of the sport utility truck currently produced and sold by Phoenix as an all-electric vehicle. (Earlier post.)
The Phoenix Sport Utility Truck is a five-passenger dual-cab pickup truck measuring 194 inches in length with a wheelbase of 108 inches. The plug-in hybrid model to be developed will include a small gasoline-fueled internal combustion engine for a range extender, a UQM PowerPhase 100 propulsion system—the same used in the all-electric model—and NanoSafe lithium titanate batteries from Altair Nanotechnologies, Inc.
The series hybrid configuration (battery dominant with range extender) is similar to that chosen by GM for its first Volt powertrain. Phoenix will announce further details about the configuration of the powertrain and operating strategy in the future.
The development of a plug-in hybrid model of our sport utility truck is an important expansion of our model offering that we expect will meet the needs of a broader range of customers. Plug-in hybrids offer the opportunity to operate the vehicle in the most common driving environments in all-electric mode, saving money and reducing emissions, while maintaining the flexibility to travel cross-country.
We believe a potentially large market will develop for this category of vehicle and we intend to develop a high performing vehicle that our customers can be excited to own and drive.
—Dan Elliott, President and CEO, Phoenix Motorcars
April 25, 2007 in Plug-ins | Permalink | Comments (45) | TrackBack (0)
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/22062/17994494
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Phoenix Motorcars and UQM to Develop Plug-In Series Hybrid Sport Utility Truck:
Comments
Great news.
Posted by: marcus | Apr 25, 2007 9:07:12 AM
I was hoping with the fast recharge they could be the first to pull off a pure electric with no performance drawbacks.
Just the same, I think this will gain them market share because of the extended range.
Posted by: Greg woulf | Apr 25, 2007 9:26:43 AM
Horrible news. This is going backwards! If you want a range extender, bolt on a small generator in the bed and plug the damn thing in. Done.
Posted by: Richard | Apr 25, 2007 10:31:31 AM
Richard:
I imagine that said generator would be far worse in terms of efficiency and emissions than a standard vehicle ICE. I don't see how this is "going backwards". The market for PHEVs is likely larger than for a pure EV, and will thus have a greater impact on overall emissions.
Posted by: Cervus | Apr 25, 2007 10:44:18 AM
I found the article a little confusing. Still, I agree with Richard.
It probably is possible to have a small ICE w/generator carried in the truck bed. Remove it when not needed, use it for longer trips. My estimate $3000-$5000 for a first class job.
But exhaust, sound, and gasoline fumes must be dealt with as soon as an ICE w/generator is added. That is why I suspect they would be better off increasing battery capacity to increase range.
Posted by: K | Apr 25, 2007 10:56:34 AM
Richard & K
That is what a SERIES Hybrid is! A Small ICE that turns a generator which recharges the batteries. The ICE DOES NOT TURN THE WHEELS DIRECTLY! The electric motor(s) turn the wheels using battery power, and maybe directly from the generator when needed.
A PARALLEL Hybrid is like a Prius. The ICE applies power directly to the wheels, with assistance from the electric motor.
The Phoenix/UQM is a SERIES Hybrid!
Posted by: dwf | Apr 25, 2007 11:52:05 AM
On the other hand... Although this article says it is a Series hybrid, the press release on the UQM web site does not specifically say if it will be a Series Hybrid or a Parallel Hybrid...
Posted by: dwf | Apr 25, 2007 12:03:20 PM
Parallel or series hybrid, its still ICE...& manifolds, injectors, catalytic converters, mufflers, gas tanks, stuff & nonsense. My 1988 Ford Festiva averaged 45MPG. Just not worth going to a hybrid. Just put extra batteries in the Phoenix. Just transport me & my work clothes & helmet to work. I'll sit next to more batteries. Also build Phoenix so you can adapt to more efficient batteries when they come out....better yet, nano ultracapacitors. But I'm sure they won't be able to upgrade. Hurry up folks! No, don't go that way. Go the right direction!
Posted by: litesong | Apr 25, 2007 12:22:40 PM
I think it's great news. All electric would be ideal IF the batteries could charge within 10 minutes, anywhere, guaranteed, but, they can't. A special (expensive) rapid charger is needed to charge on-the-quick. Normal charging time is closer to 6 hours. A small, (hopefully efficient) backup (bio-fueled) generator would be great to allow the batteries to be charged, while camping, on long trips, hauling heavy junk, etc.
Posted by: Darrin | Apr 25, 2007 12:33:48 PM
More words written about a vehicle that if ever actually constructed, will never be produced in quantity. Its not sufficient to replace the ink, paper, and electrons, wasted in it's description and P R vapor-ware, of the "vapor truck".
Posted by: Stan Peterson | Apr 25, 2007 12:47:30 PM
More words written about a vehicle that if ever actually constructed, will never be produced in quantity. Its not sufficient to replace the ink, paper, and electrons, wasted in it's description and P R vapor-ware, of the "vapor truck".
Posted by: Stan Peterson | Apr 25, 2007 12:47:36 PM
More words written about a vehicle that if ever actually constructed, will never be produced in quantity. Its not sufficient to replace the ink, paper, and electrons, wasted in it's description and P R vapor-ware, of the "vapor truck".
Posted by: Stan Peterson | Apr 25, 2007 12:47:45 PM
dwf: what words did I use that indicate I didn't know what a series hybrid was?
Posted by: K | Apr 25, 2007 1:00:12 PM
If it truly is a series hybrid, then the ICE will not come on until the battery discharges below a certain level, or if additional electricity is needed for passing or hills. It will probably have mode selection options. One mode for pure electric where the ICE does not come on at all unless the battery gets below some low level like maybe 15% power. A normal mode where the ICE only comes on when the power drops below some higher level like 50 - 85%, or if extra electricity is needed. And a performance mode, where the ICE is constantly running to give maximum power for high electric loads (hauling cargo or fast acceleration). The ICE would be SMALL (just big enough to power a generator), probably flex-fuel, and since it normally won't be running all the time it can deliver very high overall gas mileage (100+ mpg?) running mostly on batteries. You can not meet everybody's needs using pure EV, so stop knocking the compromises.
Posted by: dwf | Apr 25, 2007 1:02:06 PM
K: "It probably is possible to have a small ICE w/generator carried in the truck bed."
To me, that says you didn't know a series hybrid was the same thing, just built-in elsewhere so it isn't in the way of your cargo. That, and agreeing with Richard. ;)
The ICE/Generator would probably weigh less than extra batteries and take up less room, and give a range longer than you can take in one sitting.
Posted by: dwf | Apr 25, 2007 1:10:54 PM
Stan: Is that a studder, or do you think that if you say it enough times it will become true?
The ICE version of the truck is already in production in Korea (SsangYong Motors' Actyon Sports truck). The Phoenix Motors EV version is a conversion using currently available technology. The Hybrid will either be the original ICE version with batteries and electric assist motor(s) for a Parallel Hybrid, or the EV conversion with a small ICE and generator for a Series Hybrid.
Posted by: dwf | Apr 25, 2007 1:20:47 PM
This is a transitional technology play, and will ease us out of our oil addiction, I only wish it was a bio-diesel gen-set.
I also hope someone figures out how to apply this architecture to an F150, that would help the transition of the large volume auto makers
All in all a very good step
Posted by: Kevin | Apr 25, 2007 1:25:31 PM
A series hybrid engine can be more efficent since it can run a a fixed speed or load and operate in the converter's sweet spot.It can also have a turbo without the tricks you need to prevent turbo lag, cam phase shifting is not needed, or cylinder unloading, etc. etc. It must be pzev in emmissions or I will complain as a stockholder.
It should get the highest mpg L/Km of any in its class.
Stan: Do you think the Phoenix truck BEV is vaporware too?
Posted by: joe padula | Apr 25, 2007 1:37:16 PM
dwf: if that said I didn't know what.....etc. then you are trying pretty hard to make a fight.
I agreed with Richard - this is not where Phoenix should go. True, it can extend range and allow some operation where fast recharge is not available. But is that where Phoenix has a real market?
Phoenix will live or die by selling light vehicles to municipal agencies and local merchant deliveries, craftsmen, etc. Those vehicles aren't often going far away from the base charger - twenty miles maybe. Fast recharging can be done during lunch or breaks as well as at night.
And even 110v, available almost anywhere - can provide an emergency charge at a slower rate.
About bolting a generator to the bed. I differed with Richard and pointed out it is not simple. You must deal with exhaust routing and emissions, ease of refilling, fumes, and muffling. I might add the center of gravity shifts up. And if you build that stuff into the frame then you face a lot of expense.
So I repeat. Where did I say what a series hybrid was?
Posted by: K | Apr 25, 2007 2:07:19 PM
Who's the one trying to pick a fight here? I'm not the one with a chip on their shoulder... jeeze...
EDIT: Change "Richard & K" to "Richard"
There... you happy now???
Posted by: dwf | Apr 25, 2007 2:33:22 PM
dwf: yes!
Yes, words fail us all.
These matters often come up because the blogs allow, even encourage, unstudied responses. So I try to work closely to the topic and to exactly what was said and not said. Even though I fail I do try.
About two months ago I ran into a really bad situation. I wrote something as 'K' and someone disagreed. After I rebutted the person started writing messages signed as 'K' himself. Needless to say, they were not nice messages.
I have a stake in Phoenix. Not as a direct stockholder (it is private). So I wish them well. One maxim I have about ventures is 'keep your product line and message simple.'
Posted by: K | Apr 25, 2007 3:00:40 PM
Richard and K want the vehicle to have a *removable* range extender genset, right? Their complaint about the ICE is that it is not *removable*, right? This has no bearing on their understanding of what a series hybrid is or is not. They just don't want to lug that extra weight around when they will be running off the charge in the battery.
Posted by: Scott | Apr 25, 2007 3:11:25 PM
But they both said they wanted extra batteries. This would probably weigh the same, if not more than a genset and certainly cost more.
Posted by: James | Apr 25, 2007 3:45:39 PM
A previous news item in March said that Phoenix had sold 4 of the straight electric trucks to a California Utility. I hope this item doesn't mean that their sales stalled after 4 units. The news item is not real clear that the utility had actually taken delivery.
A check on the Phoenix web site sounds like the truck is still in crash testing and is not yet certified. It is possible that further sales will occur after certification.
Personally, I'm pulling for Phoenix and hope they make it. I don't know if their business model goes beyond California sales (they are depending on reselling some sort of green credits based on BEV sales in California to balance their costs). I would love to have one of their SUV models but I live on the wrong coast.
Posted by: Bill Young | Apr 25, 2007 4:12:45 PM
Scott: K actually said nothing like your first two sentences. But, no matter, I can see you are paying attention to the distinction between ICE/generation and defining a serial hybrid.
In fact, I discussed (twice) why a removable ICE/g did not seem very good and why I don't think Phoenix should be fooling with one whether the ICE/g is integral or can be detached.
James: You got closer. I commented that added battery power seemed a better route to more range than what was announced. And I meant that only about Phoenix and not every car company in the world.
My reasoning: This hybrid can't get Phoenix any zero emission sales but more battery power can. And Phoenix has already paid the cost to develop their vehicle structure and electronics. Why complicate that? Long range - where serial ICE should someday excel - is a different market.
I certainly can't say more battery power is cheap. If you want cheap don't make electrics at all.
p.s. A possiblility: if Phoenix is looking for an IPO or buyout then announcing a hybrid might 'tart up' the offering.
Posted by: K | Apr 25, 2007 4:36:23 PM
"gasoline fueled internal combustion engine..." Small diesel seems to be the ICE of choice for these applications. Maybe they misspoke.
Posted by: gr | Apr 25, 2007 4:46:32 PM
The Phoenix pure EV truck was previously touted as having "up to 130" mile range. Now the web site is saying "100+" mile range, though I'm not sure if it was changed or if it said that all along (on the web site). If it was reduced, it would most likely be due to additional unexpected weight and other miscalculations. The various fleet customers they hope to have buy the EV may not be satisfied with either range, and could be what necessitated the need for a hybrid version. They will still be making the EV for those who can live with a 100+ mile range. The hybrid would be for those who need to frequently drive longer distances without having to have to buy a second vehicle. If the EV version works for you, then get one. If not, get the Hybrid.
Posted by: dwf | Apr 25, 2007 5:05:45 PM
What a bunch of maroons some of you guys are.
This is exactly what Phoenix should be doing and kicking GM's ass all the way to Nanosafe heaven. That's what competitive engineering is all about. I've read some (ok, much) of what Boob Lutz has been saying and I can see why the American auto industry is getting their heads handed to them. What a boob.
jojo
Posted by: jojo | Apr 25, 2007 8:58:23 PM
I see nothing wrong with offering choices to suite particular needs. I'm sure PG&E cnosidered the range when buying the first 4 Phoenix trucks. Looking at a potential 250K+ mile overall battery life with less maintenence than ICE vehicles makes it perfect for fleet use that utilizes 100+ miles a day. I'm sure since PG&E is a utility company they would have a quickcharge unit. PG&E will save tons of money in the long run when considering fuel costs and maintenence over time. Especially if you're able to do 20K+ charges. They also are in talks of purchasing 200 additional trucks a year. No Letter of Intent has been authorized yet but I'm sure it depends on the trucks certifications.
I like the fact that Phoenix is trying to put out a serial hybrid. When Altair first announced they were partnering up with UQM, Phoenix, and Boushart... it took under 1 year to get something on the road. At that rate... this new serial hybrid might start to be manufactured by the end of 2008. A few years in advance of the Volt. BTW a serial plug is probally the next best thing to have right now since no infrastructure for the next gen fuel stations are currently up and running. GM had the right idea... serial PHEV w/flex fuel genset. I wonder if Phoenix can beat them to the punch with a a half decent price tag. Let the race being!!!
Just some trivial info to put out there... I'm sure we're all aware that AES (a global utility company) has bought a 1.5% stake in Altair. Also in the last conference call Altair expressed concerns to broaden their horizons with possible stationary energy storage units. This article is my point...
--------------------------
RENO, NV -- April 23, 2007 -- Altair Nanotechnologies Inc. (Nasdaq: ALTI), a leading provider of advanced nanomaterials technology for use in energy, life sciences and industrial applications, today announced that Robert F. Hemphill, Executive Vice President, AES Corporation, has joined its Board of Directors.
"We are very pleased to have Bob Hemphill join our board of directors," said Alan J. Gotcher, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of Altair Nanotechnologies Inc. "Bob brings to Altairnano more than 25 years of experience at one of the world's largest global power companies. His depth of experience and expertise will be a powerful addition to our company, especially as we add new intensity to our Advanced Materials and Power Systems Business Unit and our Clean Energy Storage Initiative."
-------------------
I'm curious what the next generation Nanosafe's are going to be like.
Posted by: Jimmi | Apr 25, 2007 9:35:36 PM
AES is also one of the companies that is moving towards CGCC plants in order to make carbon capture easier. This sounds like a company with some vision.
Posted by: Neil | Apr 25, 2007 9:56:25 PM
Altair’s battery has usable energy of no less than 80 Wh/kg and peak power of whopping 4 KW/kg. It means that 20 kg (45 lb) battery, weighting less than regular car battery, will be capable of no less than 60 KW peak power and 1.6 KWh usable energy, way more than 40KW and 1/3 fraction of max energy of 1.7 KWh of Ni-Mh battery used in Prius.
Applications of Altair battery in HEV, PHEV, or BEV could be extremely advantageous.
Posted by: Andrey | Apr 25, 2007 10:51:18 PM
you can read the press release here:
http://www.uqm.com/press/news/08-01.html
Posted by: Michael McMillan | Apr 26, 2007 1:12:02 AM
Audrey,
"Altair’s battery has usable energy of no less than 80 Wh/kg and peak power of whopping 4 KW/kg."
Could you please cite you source for the no less that 80Wh/kg specific energy? I have heard lots of different numbers bandied about and would like to nail it down!
Thanks,
Mike
Posted by: mike_a | Apr 26, 2007 1:48:35 AM
Interesting that the original SsangYong Actyon SUT is supposed to use a 4-cylinder Mercedes turbo diesel, that could be nice.
Posted by: D | Apr 26, 2007 7:38:14 AM
D.
Believe me its not , its a nasty smelly old tech diesel , we have had
this model here in europe now for around a year .
Posted by: andrichrose | Apr 26, 2007 8:03:51 AM
K - To clarify, when you said "Still, I agree with Richard", what part(s) of "Horrible news. This is going backwards! If you want a range extender, bolt on a small generator in the bed and plug the damn thing in. Done." were you agreeing with?
Posted by: Scott | Apr 26, 2007 9:49:32 AM
To those who think this is just "vapourware" or a bad marketing model, I would have to disagree.
I just saw the actual prototype this past Sunday at the San Diego Earth day fair. It is impressive.
In speaking with the Phoenix representatives, I gleaned much useful information about the technology, it's development, and their marketing thrust.
The Korean built SUV did come with a diesel and, as was pointed out, is far too dirty for the North American market and falls far short of our California Standards. The current California standards, as well as the upcoming requirements, may forestall widespread diesel use, even with biodiesel. The SDSU (San Diego State University) entry into a student competition, is going through the application of particle traps, urea injection and Nox controls for their turbocharged biodiesel SUV. They feel they will meet the 49 state requirements, but most likely, not the Cali requirement. I do not think a matching diesel genset will be an easy task for anyone wanting to apply it as a range extender.
The SUV just completed frontal crash testing and passed with flying colors. No intrusion into the passenger compartment and no damage to the battery pack. They don't forsee any problems with completing safety crash requirements.
The 100-130 mile range is an average of differing driving styles. Some folks will get less, and some will get more. Just like a standard vehicle. They will have an option to add a more capable battery pack to get you into the 200 to 250 mile range. This cost will be on top of the 45,000 dollar asking price for the base model.
They see their immediate market as covering the Southern Cal area. Repairs and maintenance will be done at their Ontario facility, with "Travel service" or mobile technicians "on call" for outlying areas. The battery pack and drive train seem bulletproof in their cycle testing and a 250K mile life span seems very viable. Most service is going to be centered on tires, brakes and "goodies". Yes, this SUV is loaded with AC, DVD/CD players, GPS and such. Some of which is already going into their show truck. This is another reason the mileage per charge doesn't seem that impressive. It depends on the accessory usage.
Performance? I didn't get to drive it. But they drove it in, and drove it out! So it does run. My experience in driving electric cars with this kind of power to weight ratio says this SUV will have snappy performance. It will be speed limited to 95 mph.
As for the range extending genset? They would only say,"it is being discussed right now". I think, the idea is invariably going to be a simple one, so the series route is logical. You have a good BEV drive line, and a small but functional pickup bed. A range extending spark ignition generator that runs only as needed, could easily be slid in and out. You would have many options this way. You could lease or rent it only when a long trip is planned.
Extensive towing is not recommended.
Market appeal? Many of you say you would not buy this vehicle. My wife loves it! Many of the young ladies who stopped by and jumped into it liked it immediately. The "soccer mom" types were asking where they could put a down payment on one. I think Phoenix has a hit here. At least with the ladies. I tend to agree with my wifes outlook. She drives 7.8 miles to work. She has a list of malls in the area, and none of them are more than 15 miles away. She can lug her surfboards, kayaks and rollerblades to the beach ( two blocks away ) and carry three of her girlfriends with her! "What's not to like"! She likes to say. I like the cost outlook. The Mercedes she drives around in costs us thousands a year in fuel, maintenance, and upkeep. I can bet, the Phoenix SUV will be at least as competitive, if not better, in year to year costs. And if they do maintain their $45K asking price, they will be in the ballpark for a Mercedes SUV. At which point, I will buy one from Phoenix.
I would like to say "all the good luck" to the Phoenix company and their backers, but, honestly, I think these guys are past the stage of dumb luck. I think these guys are close. Closer than many other startups. Close enough that I will vote with my money on my next car purchase. I want a BEV, my wife wants a "cute SUV". To Phoenix . . . "Build it, and they will buy"!
Posted by: RustyLugNut | Apr 26, 2007 11:53:01 AM
Scott: I'm surprised you can still ask what Richard said that I agree with.
I explicitly said his bolt on a generator idea was not as simple as he thought. And I said why in at least two comments.
What I meant about agreeing with Richard was that Phoenix is taking the wrong route with a hybrid. I thought my words Wed. 4:26 pm. explained that clearly.
Why call this a step backward? Well, technically it isn't backward because Phoenix has never built hybrids. So there no possible step backwards. Instead, call it a misstep.
Phoenix faces enough problems in the pure electric field. But at least their competitors are not massive corporations already well ahead of them. The big players: GM, Ford, Toyota, et al. are going for hybrids, some serial some parallel.
Therefore I don't see a Phoenix hybrid getting anywhere. Better to stay with electrics, make them well, and not go head-to-head with people who spend billions and have 5000 dealers ready to show anything they make.
Some other commentators (RustyLugNut above) think Phoenix is making a good move. It is certainly fair to argue that. Such is the nature of business; you win if others are mistaken and lose if you are mistaken.
Posted by: K | Apr 26, 2007 4:24:21 PM
Richard, Cervus, and K,
I respectfully disagree. This is a great move!
Full performance EVs have two problems right now:
1. The Altairnano battery meets performance needs and just obliterates the cycle life problem, but they remain EXPENSIVE.
2. Your range is limited for a pure EV because there are NO ELECTRIC CHARGING STATIONS.
A Series PHEV based on this same Altairnano (Nanosafe) battery solves both problems. All Phoenix has to do is reduce the 35 kWh battery down to 15-20 kWh (reducing both weight and cost) and add a small, efficient generator. Fairly simple electronic controls are all that is required. A Series PHEV is just a full blown EV with a range extending generator added. Effectively they will be selling more EVs. This is just the temporary bridge solution we need right now. If this Phoenix PHEV has a 40 mile all-electric range, then 75% of USA drivers will not be using any fuel, except for an occassional long trip. This includes me. I will purchase one of these if they make one. This is exactly what I'm looking for.
Not all of us can afford to spend a fortune to purchase the large 200-250 mile range battery pack. Not all of us can afford to own an extra car used just for short distance commutes. This car will reach a larger customer base. An increasing sales volume will help bring the cost of the battery down, due to economies of scale in the manufacturing. More PHEV users will provide a customer base for electricity charging stations. These are the steps you need for wide spread transition to full blown EVs. This is NOT a step backwards. It will actually accelerate the transition to full blown EVs ...and maybe make Phoenix Motorcars a larger, healthier EV company too.
Posted by: mds | Apr 26, 2007 9:06:15 PM
btw If it turns out this is a parallel/series PHEV, and not a pure Series PHEV, then I take back everything I said above. That would be a step backwards.
Posted by: mds | Apr 26, 2007 9:10:07 PM
I completely agree with MDS on both points.
Just to throw out some other trivial info regarding the Nanosafe. Current battery costs stated by Grotcher in the last conference call is about $2/wh at current production levels (about $70000 per 35 kwh Nanosafe). Through higher production levels they hope to achieve $.33/wh (about $11500 per 35 kwh Nanosafe). The serial hybrid would probally use a smaller battery and if we use MDS' numbers of 15-20 kwh... than you're looking at a battery costing about $4950-$6600. If the Nanosafe holds true to their claim of 15000 charges than you're looking at (using only 25 miles per charge) a battery that will have a life of 375000-500000 miles.
Here's a few questions to ponder... If you have a battery that costs around $5500, how much will it costs to build a serial PHEV truck around that battery??? What will the sticker price be on such a vehicle??? Can Altair bring the costs down below $.33/wh??? What will the warranty be like for such a battery???
Posted by: Jimmi | Apr 26, 2007 10:03:40 PM
Mike:
90 Wh/kg: this number is indeed not widely advertised by Altair, because it is quite moderate. There are a lot of estimations, and only couple of direct references. This is one of them:
http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/zevprog/symposium/presentations/house.pdf
Look at graphs at pages 10 and 18.
Posted by: Andrey | Apr 27, 2007 12:18:08 PM
I would hope they would offer a PHEV version with the full 35 KWH battery with a electric mode only drawdown to 15% (85% DOD)so the AER would still be about 85 miles.
Posted by: Van | Apr 28, 2007 2:49:49 PM
I feel identically to those who have stated a preference for a plug-in serial hybrid.
I have studied the parallel hybrid from Honda known as Integrated Motor Assist. It requires the ICE to be on all the time. Not optimal. The Toyota serial-parallel Hybrid Synergy Drive is very complicated and expensive even though it is a little more efficient at bringing power to the pavement when gasoline is your fuel.
The serial hybrid idea -- which is basically how almost all locomotives in the United States are operated -- is not as efficient as Toyota's drivetrain because the ICE never directly drives the wheels, but it is much simpler and more flexible.
Let me run a scenario by you all. With a serial hybrid, you can buy an electric car with empty space to insert an ICE. Since there is no direct connection between the engine and the wheels, you can find the engine which best suits your needs. It is not mated to a transmission. All it does is produce electricity. You can buy a diesel, gasoline, LNG, CNG, propane, ethanol, butanol, etc. generator based on where you live and what fuels are cheapest and readily available.
That way, GM can make one car body for the whole world. And you, the end user, decide what type of extender motor to put in there. And hell, you can leave that out if you don't need it. It is modular heaven. Plug and play. And manufacturers can focus on making gensets based on the consumer. Maybe a consumer wants to spend more for efficiency. He pays a premium for a low consumption ICE generator. Maybe he can't afford it. He pays for the medium efficiency. Maybe he prefers to fuel his car with natural gas from his home. He buys a CNG generator. But GM doesn't have to care. They make the car. Offer a small selection of generator sets and then allow it to be plug and play for other manufacturers to make optimized engines for a particular market. From a corporate point of view, it is like the IBM PC idea applied to cars. The automobile company produces a short range electric car and then the consumer decides what "cards" to put in it to expand its functionality. You can get into a 40 mile electric car with hybrid expansion capability for cheaper and add the electric generator when you want.
Now, will my idea take off? Don't know. But it sure is what most consumers who are into alternative energy want: options.
Ralph D. Taite
Posted by: Ralph | Apr 29, 2007 10:04:52 AM
Van...
Taking into consideration the cost target Altair has for the Nanosafe through higher levels of production ($.33/wh), the 35 kwh Nanosafe will be just over $11k. Although rather cheap compared to current costs ($2/wh = $70k for the 35 kwh Nanosafe)... this price might be a lil high to bring the serial hybrid to a moderate consumer range (around $35k). Since 70% of Americans only commute 40 miles to and from work, there would be lil use for a 35 kwh Nanosafe. I'm thinking a 20 kwh Nanosafe would do the trick and only cost $6600 at $.33/wh.
Posted by: Jimmi | Apr 29, 2007 9:46:57 PM
