« Start-up Places $79-Million Order for ZAP Electric Vehicles | Main | California ARB Releases Report on First Steps Toward Cutting Greenhouse Gas Emissions »
Survey: Majority of Californians Concerned about Energy Security and Climate Change; Diesel Seen as Part of the Solution
21 April 2007
A significant majority of Californians are concerned about climate change and the state’s reliance on imported energy, and they view clean diesel technology as a positive solution to both problems, according to the results of a recent public opinion poll sponsored by the Diesel Technology Forum (DTF).
Some 79% of California voters are "very concerned" or "somewhat concerned" that California continues to import an increasing percentage of its energy, while 63% are very or somewhat concerned about climate change. When asked, "Do you think your personal vehicle has any impact on the earth's climate," 60% of respondents said yes, 33 percent of survey respondents said no, and 7% didn’t know or declined to answer.
The survey asked respondents to choose what type of vehicle they would purchase to show their concern for the environment. Some 60% of Californians said they would choose a hybrid-electric vehicle over a clean diesel vehicle (29%)—"both of which had the same fuel economy and emissions output."
However, those percentages changed when respondents were asked if they knew the clean diesel option was "up to $2,000 less expensive than the hybrid electric option, and both options had comparable emissions and fuel economy." In that case, 54% said they would choose a clean diesel vehicle over a hybrid electric vehicle (38%).
Californians recognize the key role diesel technology plays in the state's goods movement and farm and construction industries, but they surprised us somewhat in their recognition of diesel passenger cars.
What we wanted to know is: If a clean diesel is cost-competitive or superior to a hybrid vehicle, would consumers be likely to choose a clean diesel? How much does the price of the technology affect the market competition between both platforms?
Now we know that consumers are likely to choose a clean diesel vehicle over a hybrid electric once they compare fuel economy, emissions and price. This suggests to us that consumers recognize other fuel efficient technologies and are receptive to them.
—Allen Schaeffer, DTF Executive Director
Other findings of the survey include:
Some 65% of Californians believe the state’s air quality has improved or remained the same during the past 20 years, while only 9% believe it has gotten worse.
Asked if government policies to reduce energy consumption and air pollution should favor certain technologies, or let technology improvements meet specific standards, 64% favored results-driven public policy while 27% favored government picking favored technologies.
On a related question, 69% of respondents said government should not choose between compressed natural gas or clean diesel powered large vehicles if both technologies comparably reduced fuel consumption and emissions.
Asked "which do you think is the most likely way that climate change will be addressed," 28% said "new technologies driven by consumer demand," 20% said "new laws and regulations," 12% said "individual action," and 32% said "a combination of each."
When people think of "diesel," 61% think of heavy-duty trucks, 16% think of passenger vehicles, and 8% think of off-road equipment like tractors.
The public opinion survey was conducted April 12-14 by David Binder Research of San Francisco. The survey had a sample size of 500 California voters and a margin of error of plus or minus 4.4 percent.
The Diesel Technology Forum (DTF) is a non-profit public education and outreach organization made up of diesel vehicle and engine makers, components manufacturers and fuel providers.
April 21, 2007 in Diesel, Emissions, Fuel Efficiency | Permalink | Comments (27) | TrackBack (0)
Comments
Posted by: Mick | April 25, 2007 at 12:52 PM
There are developments in DME in China:
We see great potential for DME as a clean alternative fuel . The present diesel oil is a major source of air pollution from diesel engine of trucks and busses in large city like Tokyo. The potential market of diesel oil substitute is larger than LPG. DME is one of ideal fuel for diesel engine. DME vehicles were demonstratively manufactured in Japan, China and Korea and their driving test already started. Practical durability fleet test of a DME truck is under going in Japan.
We are pleased to organise a conference on China taking the lead in the DME market in production from coal and Japan and Korea activities.
If you would like to know more on COAL to Syngas to DME developments, join us at upcoming North Asia DME / Methanol conference in Beijing, 27-28 June 2007, St Regis Hotel. The conference covers key areas which include:
DME productivity can be much higher especially if
country energy policies makes an effort comparable to
that invested in increasing supply.
By:
National Development Reform Commission NDRC
Ministry of Energy for Mongolia
Production of DME/ Methanol through biomass
gasification could potentially be commercialized
By:
Shandong University completed Pilot plant in Jinan and
will be sharing their experience.
Advances in conversion technologies are readily
available and offer exciting potential of DME as a
chemical feedstock
By: Kogas, Lurgi and Haldor Topsoe
Available project finance supports the investments
that DME/ Methanol can play a large energy supply role
By: International Finance Corporation
For more information: www.iceorganiser.com
Posted by: Cheryl Ho | May 23, 2007 at 12:16 AM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00d834545d9869e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Survey: Majority of Californians Concerned about Energy Security and Climate Change; Diesel Seen as Part of the Solution :

Twitter headlines
Tom wrote:
"I have seen estimates that say an EV getting its electricity from the "average" power plant would cut co2 in half compared to essentially the same vehicle using an ICE."
It's actually even better than that Tom. To assume EVs are charged using electricity from the "average power plant" mix is overly pessimistic. Most of us will recharge our EVs using "interruptable power", which is cheaper than what we use for the rest of our house. Interruptable power requires having 2 meters and allows the power company the right to cut it off during peak power usage. Peak power is produced by "peaking units" and is more expensive and dirtier than what's available during off-peak hours. Therefore the power we use to recharge our EVs will be cleaner and cheaper than the "average power plant" mix.