« DaimlerChrysler to Sell 80% of Chrysler to Cerebus | Main | Lithium Technology Corporation Introduces New Line of Large-Format Lithium Iron Phosphate Cells for Auto Industry »
IEA: Switch to Cleaner Marine Fuel Will Increase CO2 Emissions
14 May 2007
Reuters. The International Energy Agency (IEA) is cautioning that switching from fuel oil to cleaner, less polluting marine diesel in ship engines would result in a net increase in global carbon dioxide emissions, require billions in refinery investments and could boost oil prices.
The International Maritime Organization (IMO) is considering the switch from fuel oil to marine diesel to improve the environmental footprint of the shipping industry.
In its monthly Oil Market Report, the IEA said that studies had concluded that converting refineries to produce enough diesel for shipping demand would produce at least an extra 53 million tonnes a year of CO2, whereas emissions from ships if using diesel would only fall by 27 million tonnes.
The loss of a large shipping market for fuel oil growing 5-7 percent as trade expands and the additional diesel demand would have massive implications for the refining sector, including potential extra investment of US$100-$150 billion, it said.
“It may also require an additional 2 million barrels per day of crude runs, which would be the equivalent of finding another Kuwait,” the West’s energy watchdog said.
May 14, 2007 in Brief | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00d83514f83353ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference IEA: Switch to Cleaner Marine Fuel Will Increase CO2 Emissions:
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Go to GCC Discussions forum
Twitter headlines
Perhaps the IEA didn't take into consideration the REDUCTION of other harmful polutants?
Increased oil prices? Refinery investments? That's all stuff that we NEED. So what's the problem?
Posted by: John | May 14, 2007 at 02:03 PM
managed to our things. Behind them. the forests little
Posted by: jokehomeocea | May 29, 2008 at 01:52 AM