Green Car Congress
About GCC Contact  RSS Subscribe Twitter headlines

« Exelon, Entergy Sign Letters of Intent with GE-Hitachi for Next-Generation Uranium Enrichment Services | Main | Oak Ridge National Laboratory Joins Model Fuels Consortium »

Print this post

DOE Announces Final Rule for Advanced Energy Technology Loan Guarantee Program; Tesla Motors Among 16 Pre-Applicants Invited to Submit Final Applications

5 October 2007

The US Department of Energy (DOE) has issued the final regulations for the loan guarantee program authorized by Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct). Also today, DOE invited 16 project sponsors, who submitted pre-applications last fall, to submit full applications for loan guarantees.

These projects include advanced technologies involving the uses of biomass, fossil energy, solar, industrial energy efficiency, electricity delivery and energy reliability, hydrogen, and alternative fuel vehicles.

The following is a summary of the 16 projects and sponsors invited to submit full applications.

Summary of 16 Sponsors and Projects Invited to Submit Final Applications
SponsorLocationProject
Alternative Fuel Vehicles Project
Tesla Motors New Mexico The construction of a battery-electric powered vehicle with enhanced range that can be produced for the consumer market.
Biomass Projects
Alico, Inc. Florida A first-of-a-kind commercial-scale cellulosic ethanol plant that would use multiple feedstocks and produce multiple products.
Blue Fire Ethanol, Inc. California A commercial-scale cellulosic ethanol plant using an array of low-cost feedstocks.
Choren USA Southeastern US An industrial-scale biomass gasification facility for clean synthetic diesel fuels in the United States.
Endicott Biofuels, LLC Virginia A second generation biodiesel and bio-derived products plant that would feature a high level of feedstock flexibility allowing for the production of a broad range of biodiesel fuels.
Iogen Biorefinery Partners, LLC Idaho A biorefinery to produce ethanol from a wide range of cellulosic feedstocks and to produce other byproducts of value to several industries.
Voyager Ethanol, LLC Iowa A cellulosic ethanol plant that can accommodate multiple feedstocks in the production of ethanol and higher value byproducts.
Solar Energy Projects
Luz II Nevada Development of a highly efficient large-scale power project using concentrated solar-thermal technology
Solyndra, Inc. California The manufacture of highly efficient thin-film photovoltaic modules.
Hydrogen Project
Bridgeport Fuel Cell Park LLC Connecticut To build the largest single-site installation of fuel cells in the world.
Advanced Fossil Energy Projects
Mesaba Energy Project (MEP-I, LLC) Minnesota A state-of-the-art Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plant that would allot space in its design for CO2 capture and storage.
Mississippi Power Company Mississippi An IGCC plant with potential for CO2 capture in the future, that would commercialize a first-of-its-kind application.
TX Energy, LLC Texas Commercialization of a new Coal to Synthetic Gas IGCC polygeneration gasification facility that can isolate a significant concentrated stream of CO2 while producing large amounts of power and methanol.
Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Project
Beacon Power Massachusetts A system that will enhance peak performance of electric generation over the power grid.
Industrial Energy Efficiency Projects
GR Silicate Nano Fibers and Carbonates Washington A highly energy efficient process for manufacturing paper.
Sage Electrochromics Minnesota A manufacturing facility that would produce electrochromic windows for the commercial and residential building sectors.

The final regulation provides that the Department may issue guarantees for up to 100% of the amount of a loan, subject to the EPAct limitation that DOE may not guarantee a debt instrument for more than 80% of the total cost of an eligible project. Under the final rule, if DOE issues a guarantee for 100% of a debt instrument, the loan must be issued and funded by the Treasury Department’s Federal Financing Bank.

While Congress must provide authority in an appropriations act for the loan guarantees that the Department will issue, DOE’s intent is to only issue loan guarantees if borrowers and project sponsors pay the “credit subsidy cost” for any loan guarantee they receive. Therefore, DOE does not plan to use taxpayer funds to pay for the credit subsidy costs of these loan guarantees.

The final regulation also provides for the following:

  • The Title XVII loan guarantee program will be implemented through a series of solicitations. The solicitations may target specific technology areas or be general;

  • Eligible projects must employ new or significantly improved technologies that avoid, reduce or sequester air pollutants or anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases as compared to commercial technologies in service in the United States at the time the loan guarantee agreement is executed;

  • The guaranteed portion of a partially guaranteed loan may be separated from or "stripped" from the non-guaranteed portion, except in cases where the guarantee exceeds 90 % of the loan amount;

  • In the event of a loan default, DOE will have a superior lien on all project assets pledged as collateral for the guaranteed loan; however, the final rule allows for the possibility in a default situation that lenders and holders of the non-guaranteed debt could share proportionately with the Department in proceeds from the sale of project assets pledged as collateral. A pari passu structure will not be permitted to override the Department’s superior right to project assets;

  • The Secretary of Energy must determine that there is a “reasonable prospect” of repayment of the guaranteed debt before a loan guarantee may be issued;

  • DOE must charge and collect fees sufficient to cover applicable administrative expenses;

  • Borrower–paid Credit Subsidy Costs and administrative fees paid to DOE may not be included within total project costs for the purposes of determining the amount of guarantees that DOE can issue for a project;

  • A project’s receipt of other governmental assistance does not disqualify a project from receiving a Title XVII loan guarantee; however, when evaluating a project’s application for a Title XVII loan guarantee, DOE will consider the extent to which a project will receive other governmental assistance, (e.g., grants, tax credits, other loan guarantees); and

  • The borrower must have a significant equity stake in a project, and proceeds from guaranteed or non-guaranteed debt, and the value of government grants and other assistance, will not be counted as “equity.”

Congress currently is considering the Department’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 Budget request for $9 billion in loan guarantee authority and $8.4 million to run the Loan Guarantee office. Both of these actions are important for the successful execution of this program. DOE’s issuance of additional loan guarantee program solicitations is dependent on receiving adequate additional authorization from the Congress and funding for the operation of its Loan Guarantee program office.

The 16 pre-applicants invited today to submit full loan guarantee applications for review must inform DOE by 30 October 2007 if they plan to submit a full application. The full application review will be subject to the final regulations issued today. The decision to issue loan guarantees will depend on the merits and benefits of particular project proposals and their compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements. The pre-applicants not selected to submit full applications from this solicitation can reapply for future solicitations, for which their project is eligible.

October 5, 2007 in Biomass, Electric (Battery), Fuel Cells, Hydrogen, Power Generation | Permalink | Comments (7) | TrackBack (0)

Comments

US $9 billion? How much have they spent on the oil wars?

Posted by: Mort | October 05, 2007 at 06:14 AM

Well Mort, loan guarantees are not actually spending money. It is more about reducing risk for long term projects. There is very little risk for using natural gas a fuel because capital cost are low and fuel cost are passed onto society.

Establish a precedence for supporting high capital cost alternative energy projects, what is the worse that could happen? Some could go out of business because the price of natural gas has decreased. I do not think that will happen but that is the goal. Too much alternative energy, will are kids handle such a problem?

If the program works, Congress will supply more money.

Posted by: Kit P | October 05, 2007 at 06:55 AM

Hi Kit P., you sed:

Well Mort, loan guarantees are not actually spending money.

Actually, that's even worse, because you're right, they haven't spent anything at all. Yeah, I get the joke. How would the younger generation cope if they had too much thermal solar electrical supply to deal with in the coming decades? The horror...

Posted by: Mort | October 05, 2007 at 07:25 AM

Mort,
Loan guarantees aren't direct cash grants from the government, but they work out the same for the recipient, as they reduce the risk for the folks who'll lend these companies money. So the recipients get access to a loan at least as large as the guarantee, possibly larger if the lenders agree to accept, say, a partially guaranteed loan for higher interest. Uncle Sam pays only if the company defaults on the loan. The lender is safe, and, assuming every single company doesn't default, and are around to pay it back that's good, too. It also has some discipline to it in that it's not a handout with no strings, and due to the sort of Darwinian selection aspect. So though it's not as big a sum of money as you'd like, it will be much appreciated by the various entrepreneurs who qualified.

Posted by: Jim G. | October 05, 2007 at 04:21 PM

Solar Energy Projects
Luz II Nevada Development of a highly efficient large-scale power project using concentrated solar-thermal technology.

Luz was the name of the company that did the 300 megawatt Kramer Junction project in the Mojave desert and the 1970s. All was going fine until Reagan took away all the tax breaks and the company went out of business. Kramer is still producing power 30 years later and the people that designed it have learned enough to make the next one even more competitive.

Posted by: sjc | October 07, 2007 at 08:06 PM

Well,

Finally they put up something...nice vehicle indeed!

www.pearmotors.com

Fred

Posted by: Fred | October 08, 2007 at 01:00 AM

How to make a solar thermal plant more economical:

“auxiliary natural gas-fired heater is available and operates to supplement sources of power (the energy supplied by natural gas is limited by regulations to 25% of the total effective annual plant energy input)”

Posted by: Kit P | October 08, 2007 at 06:51 PM

Post a comment
[Please keep comments on topic. Disagreement is fine; insults, abuse or wild diversions are not. Comments not meeting those standards will be deleted. Abuse of another commenter’s email address will result in the banning of the offender from this site. In an attempt to prevent the posting of insulting and abusive comments, this site maintains a list of prohibited words and phrases, which, unfortunately, grows with time. Including one of the prohibited words or phrases will flag the comment as “spam”, and it will be blocked.]

Green Car Congress only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00e54f0511288834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference DOE Announces Final Rule for Advanced Energy Technology Loan Guarantee Program; Tesla Motors Among 16 Pre-Applicants Invited to Submit Final Applications:

Green Car Congress © 2009 BioAge Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Home | BioAge Group