« SatCon Wins $2 Million Contract to Develop Advanced Hybrid Electric Powertrain | Main | Land Rover to Make Stop/Start System Standard on Diesel Freelander 2 in 2009 »
Study: Public Transportation Use Substantially Reduces CO2 Emissions
2 October 2007
An individual commuter switching from single occupancy driving to public transit can reduce his or her daily carbon emissions by 20 pounds—more than 4,800 pounds in a year—according to a new study prepared for the American Public Transportation Association (APTA) by Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC).
The research points out that due to increases in vehicle miles traveled, the problem of pollution from vehicle emissions is accelerating. Greenhouse gas emissions from mobile sources have grown 27% from 1990 to 2004. Autos and light duty trucks represent about 61% of the total mobile source of greenhouse gas emissions. The report says single occupancy drivers switching their work commute to public transportation is one of the more effective ways to reduce the nation’s vehicle miles traveled while reducing harmful carbon dioxide.
Public transportation use should be at the top of the list of ways for households to become greener. While it is good public policy to require more fuel efficient automobiles, increasing the use of transit can have a more immediate impact on our nation’s transportation fuel consumption
—William Millar, APTA president
APTA is calling on Congress to incorporate public transportation into a national climate strategy that includes providing additional funding levels for more public transportation investment; providing tax credits to major employers who spend resources to support mass transit ridership programs; and tax credits to developers for mixed development residential, commercial and transportation sites that encourage greater use of public transportation.
Resources:
October 2, 2007 in Brief | Permalink | Comments (6) | TrackBack (0)
Comments
Posted by: Nick | October 02, 2007 at 02:00 PM
I have no quarrel with the conclusion. Would anyone think driving a car doesn't produce more CO2 than riding on light rail? Does anyone think good public transportation won't improve city life?
One factor often overlooked. People riding on light rail are doing so because it is taking them where they want to go. But those in cars may be driving precisely because that light rail won't take them where they want to go.
So each rider and driver has already made some sort of analysis and chosen riding or driving for that trip.
Posted by: K | October 02, 2007 at 05:54 PM
Good point K, you also need to take a step back from individual choice to the urban and transport planning decisions that guide those choices. We can structure cities so that public transport is an attractive choice if governments choose to make public transport infrastructure a higher funding priority and if employment, services and residential dwellings are clustered closer together.
Posted by: critta | October 02, 2007 at 09:07 PM
critta:
I understand what you are saying. Many believe that more tinkering and thought by various levels of government will get things right. Then the people will be happy and urbane. The cities will be 'world class' and 'vibrant'.
I don't believe it.
IMO the age of the dominant central city with a 'downtown' is passing. Cities formed because proximity allowed the most efficient exchange of ideas and goods. Technology has, or soon will, end that.
Posted by: K | October 03, 2007 at 12:32 AM
I disgree.
Lets talk reality.
Most times ofthe day you haver a multi-ton Bus, driven by a driver, and zero or only a few passengers on many routes. That is an awful real world example of the difference between theoretical and actual efficiency.
Posted by: Stan Peterson | October 03, 2007 at 09:46 PM
Which is why increases in ridership are so cheap in terms of CO2. There is no marginal cost if increases in ridership are to be absorbed by existing excess capacity. Once you reach the point where new capacity has to be installed, in terms of rights of way or more transit vehicles, the costs (in money and CO2) become real. Two to three people carpooling in a high MPG vehicle yields an effective 100-150 person miles per gallon, which compares well to most bus lines, and can be far more convenient.
Posted by: NBK-Boston | October 05, 2007 at 03:56 AM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00e54eeecd808833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Study: Public Transportation Use Substantially Reduces CO2 Emissions:

Twitter headlines
"The report says single occupancy drivers switching their work commute to public transportation is one of the more effective ways to reduce the nation’s vehicle miles traveled while reducing harmful carbon dioxide."
Talk about stating the obvious...