Green Car Congress
About GCC Contact  RSS Subscribe Twitter headlines

« Leeds Study Indicates that Sequestered CO2 Can React Quickly with Underground Reservoir Rock for Safe Storage | Main | CSIRO Invests in Hybrid Energy Storage System Start-Up »

Print this post

AREVA and China Guangdong Nuclear Power Sign Largest Nuclear Contract Ever

26 November 2007

Epr80_numero_6_9_07
Cutaway of an EPR. (1) reactor vessel, (2) the steam generators,(3) the pressurizer, (4) reactor coolant pumps, (5) inner prestressed  concrete housing, (6) metallic liner and outer reinforced concrete shell, (7) special area for collection and cooling of escaping molten core, (8, 9) backup diesel generators, (10) turbine building. Click to enlarge. Larger detailed cutaway here.

AREVA and China Guangdong Nuclear Power COrporation (CGNPC) signed a record contract worth €8 billion (US$11.9 billion)—the biggest ever in the history of nuclear power—and entered into a long-term commitment.

Through a series of agreements, AREVA, in conjunction with CGNPC, will build two new generation EPR reactors and will provide all the materials and services required to operate them. Following Finland and France, China will be home to the third and fourth EPR to be built in the world. The EPR will be built in Taishan in Guangdong province.

The EPR is a Generation III+ pressurized water reactor (PWR) which generates about 1,600 MWe of electric power and features enhanced safety and simplified operations and maintenance. It has a projected service life of 60 years, compared with a 40-year service life for other power reactors. AREVA offers two third-generation reactor models: the EPR and the SWR 1000, a boiling water reactor (BWR) that can generate 1,000-1,250 MWe.

Reacteur_animea_2
Pressurized water reactor. Click to enlarge.

In a Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) like the EPR, water removes the heat produced inside the reactor core by nuclear fission. (See diagram at right.) This water also moderates neutrons to sustain the nuclear chain reaction (neutrons have to be moderated to be able to break down the fissile atom nuclei).

The heat produced inside the reactor core is transferred to the turbine through the steam generators. Only heat is exchanged between the reactor cooling circuit (primary circuit) and the steam circuit used to feed the turbine (secondary circuit). No exchange of cooling water takes place. The primary water is pumped through the reactor core and the primary side of the steam generators, in four parallel closed loops, by coolant pumps powered by electric motors.

The EPR was developed by Framatome and Siemens KWU (the nuclear division of Siemens), whose nuclear activities were combined in January 2001 to form Framatome ANP, now AREVA NP. The French electricity utility EDF (Electricité de France), together with the major German utilities, played an active role in the project.

As a new-generation reactor, the EPR affords economic and technical progress over its predecessors, according to AREVA: enhanced safety level, reduced volumes of long-lived waste, considerable reduction in the doses received by operating and maintenance personnel, and reduced electricity production costs (better use of fuel, improved availability, higher operating flexibility, and fewer maintenance constraints).

Better use is made of fuel in the EPR—17% less uranium is required to generate the same amount of electricity, thereby, reducing the volume of waste. Costs are therefore lower for the entire fuel cycle from enrichment to reprocessing. The general layout of the equipment is designed to provide easier access and simplify maintenance operations that are consequently carried out more rapidly. Routine maintenance of safety-related systems can be carried out without shutting down the plant. The length of the scheduled refueling outage has been shortened to allow an increase of reactor availability to more than 90%.

In line with the requirements of the French and German safety authorities, the initial designs of the EPR made allowance for a military aircraft impact scenario. In the September 11 context, the call for bids launched in 2002 by Finland for its fifth reactor demanded that candidate models must be capable of withstanding an impact by a commercial aircraft. The EPR designs were, therefore, upgraded with extra thickness and provided scope for these modifications without any effect on the fundamental design of the EPR.

In the event of core damage and the occurrence of a core melt, the molten core (“corium”), after melting through the reactor vessel wall, would be contained in a dedicated spreading compartment. This compartment is then cooled to remove the residual heat.

In the USA, AREVA will submit its US EPR Design Certification (DC) application by mid-December 2007 to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission with an anticipated validation by 2010. Validation by 2010 would enable that a US EPR to be licensed and ready for operation in 2015.

In the United Kingdom, on September 10, 2007, AREVA and EDF launched a joint website that presents the details of the EPR nuclear reactor. These details have been submitted to the UK regulators for design assessment.

Concurrent with the AREVA-GNPC contract, an agreement has been signed between China and France opening the way to industrial cooperation in the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle. Under this agreement, CNNC (China National Nuclear Corporation) and Areva have agreed to undertake feasibility studies related to the construction of a spent fuel reprocessing-recycling plant in China. They have also created a joint venture in the area of zirconium.

Chinanukes
China’s nuclear plants. Click to enlarge.

In 2007, China has an installed nuclear capacity of 9 GWe with 11 nuclear power plants in operation, generating 2% of China's electricity production. Nuclear power stations are located in the south and south-east of the country where there is most economic growth and no coal or dams. China has selected a range of different technologies for its nuclear program, some of which have been developed by Chinese companies, while others are being imported from France, Canada, and Russia.

In May 2007, the government and the National Development and Reform Commission planned to increase nuclear capacity to 40 GWe by 2020, and to 120-160 GWe by 2030.

November 26, 2007 in China, Nuclear | Permalink | Comments (34) | TrackBack (0)

Comments

"Why push it?" -- all available evidence suggests that building power reactors does not push it, and refraining from building them will not restrain it.

Several proliferators or wannabe proliferators (including the Nazis) went the heavy water reactor route. So, technologies that make heavy water easier to produce would assist on a proven route to proliferation.

What would assist in the production of heavy water? Large scale production of hydrogen by electrolysis. It's relatively easy to augment an electrolysis plant with a countercurrent exchange column that strips the deuterium from the outgoing hydrogen stream. The resulting heavy water has a marginal cost of production (assuming you are doing the electrolysis anyway) that would be difficult to beat with any other known D2O production technology.

So, if possibly assisting nuclear proliferation is a showstopper for a new energy technology, I'm afraid that plans for solar/wind-powered hydrogen production will have to be abandoned.

Posted by: Paul Dietz | November 28, 2007 at 09:04 PM

"For a proliferator, they naturally are a long way around." - this sentence doesn't make sense to me, so I don't know how to respond to it.

It's analogous to, "For a pedestrian, house-tops naturally are a long way around". If you don't want strange people walking through the neighbourhood, putting traps and stumbling blocks on the roof ridges of the houses has a good chance of keeping them from traversing those roofs, but will not prevent their taking the sidewalks.

Posted by: G.R.L. Cowan, hydrogen-to-boron convert | November 28, 2007 at 09:41 PM

A pity those solar panels aren't producing that rated power 90+% of the time, like nuclear reactors are
Pity you can't put a nuclear reactor on your roof.

Posted by: DS | November 28, 2007 at 10:04 PM

There's a lot to be said for the decentralization of power production. Solar panels also make lousy terrorists targets.
But hey, let's spend more money and risk our environment so we can have a "gee whiz" solution.

Posted by: domenick | November 29, 2007 at 03:19 AM

Pity you can't put a nuclear reactor on your roof.

I pointed out the numerical mistake in the original claim, and the response is this irrelevancy. Sigh.

But anyway, having the system on my own property, where I am responsible for its maintenance and safety, is a bug, not a feature.

Posted by: Paul Dietz | November 29, 2007 at 06:07 AM

F* you's
Banned me bloody cracker night and now everyones insisting on the right to to hydrogen night . I say again F*cku's.

Posted by: Arnold | December 04, 2007 at 03:18 AM

Last night one too many in decelebratin
And today the foreign minister meets..
In negotiation to see if we can move the launch on request status from 2-8 minutes to a "more appropriate days"
Gee that'll mean I got time to put the garbage out.
There is no such thing as a peacefull atom.
Everone is different (evidently), Unique almost life like I'm told.
2000 Test firings, cancers expected to be running at 30%.
Fat tissues store insectcides and that also is a point of origin.
Big city haze equivalent to to two packs of cigs a day?
Anyone know a good whisky?

Posted by: Arnold | December 04, 2007 at 11:13 AM

The waste issues is just that a nonissue. Any Geologist can tell you where to find rock strata that has sat undisturbed for billions of years. The first place that comes to mind is the Canadian shield. That rock formation is 4 billion years old and has not had any seismic activity since the earth was still molten at the surface. For waste the issue is simply put the fresh waste in concrete armored casks with inert atmospheres for 25-50 years so most of the prompt decay heat decays out what’s left after 50 years has low enough activity levels to not heat rock to the fracture point. Then burry the remaining waste in a geological stable formation such as the Canadian shield where it will sit for the next billion years immobile below ground water out of the biosphere permanently. Another alternative is deep ocean disposal in a subduction zone. Burry the waste at subduction zone and the descending crustal plate will gradually draw the waste into the mantel at the rate of 2 cm a year. Over the next 200000 years the longest lived waste the will have traveled 2000m deeper into the mantel. At this depth manmade casks would still have integrity but the waste would have decayed to the point of its no longer more radioactive than the background radiation at that depth. From this point forward in time the crustal plate will keep drawing the now harmless waste into the mantel to be entombed for all eternity.

Posted by: texasgeologist | January 25, 2008 at 09:42 AM

You can decorate the mantel yourself or you can get the entire family in on the fun. Having them each places their own decoration or theme on the fireplace mantel will give it a piece of their personality and let them enjoy the masterpiece even more. You can go all out when decorating the fireplace mantel or you can go simple and classy. No matter what you choose, you will make the fireplace a statement of your own and a beautiful sight for everyone to enjoy.

Posted by: sale fireplaces | March 26, 2008 at 12:00 AM

Post a comment
[Please keep comments on topic. Disagreement is fine; insults, abuse or wild diversions are not. Comments not meeting those standards will be deleted. Abuse of another commenter’s email address will result in the banning of the offender from this site. In an attempt to prevent the posting of insulting and abusive comments, this site maintains a list of prohibited words and phrases, which, unfortunately, grows with time. Including one of the prohibited words or phrases will flag the comment as “spam”, and it will be blocked.]

Green Car Congress only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00e54f8de3c78833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference AREVA and China Guangdong Nuclear Power Sign Largest Nuclear Contract Ever:

Green Car Congress © 2009 BioAge Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Home | BioAge Group