Green Car Congress
About GCC Contact  RSS Subscribe Twitter headlines

« Johnson Controls-Saft Supplying NiMH and Li-ion Batteries for Chery and SAIC Hybrids | Main | Xethanol Reports Improved Rate and Yield for Cellulosic Ethanol in USDA Lab »

Print this post

Chrysler’s Three Electric Drive Concept Cars Highlight New Modular, Shared Systems Approach

15 January 2008

Ecovoyager
The Chrysler ecoVoyager fuel cell extended range electric vehicle.

Chrysler unveiled three different electric drive concept cars at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit: the Chrysler ecoVoyager Concept, an electric vehicle with a fuel cell range extender; the Jeep Renegade Concept, an electric vehicle with a BLUETEC diesel range extender; and the Dodge ZEO Concept, a battery electric vehicle with a 250-mile range.

Chrysler envisions its electric-drive systems to be modular, with a high-level of technology sharing and component reuse. Common elements include a 200 kW (268 hp) electric motor, electrical architecture, power electronics, and grid-chargeable lithium-ion battery technology, among others.

Ecovoychassis Renegade_chassis Zeo_chassis
The ecoVoyager chassis. The Renegade chassis. The ZEO chassis.
Click each image to enlarge.

In execution, this approach is comparable to the efforts GM is making with its E-Flex system: common electric powertrain elements with varied sources of electricity.

Chrysler ecoVoyager Concept. The ecoVoyager is an electric vehicle with a 16 kWh lithium-ion battery module that supports a 40-mile all-battery range. Total driving range is 300 miles when coupled with the 45 kW PEM fuel cell range extender.

The common 200 kW electric motor drives the front wheels. Compressed hydrogen is stored in 700 bar (10,000 psi) tanks.

Renegade
Jeep Renegade concept.

The Jeep Renegade. The Renegade concept also uses also an electric vehicle with the common 40-mile, 16 kWh lithium-ion battery module, but uses dual 200 kW motors—one on each axle—for four-wheel-drive capability.

Driving range is extended by an electric generator coupled to a 1.5-liter, 3-cylinder BLUETEC diesel engine. Renegade has a 400-mile combined range, and is capable of achieving an equivalent petroleum fuel economy of 110 mpg.

Zeo
Dodge ZEO BEV.

The Dodge ZEO. The ZEO is a full Battery Electric Vehicle powered by the common electric motor driving the rear wheels. Driving range is 250 miles with the integrating of multiple lithium-ion battery modules for a total energy rating of 64 kWh.

According to Chrysler, addressing future challenges such as global warming, energy security and customer wants and needs will require the production implementation of one or more of these technologies in the not-too-distant future.

Chrysler highlighted the concepts as examples of the type of products that its new ENVI in-house organization is tasked to deliver. Chrysler formed ENVI late last year with a focus on establishing Chrysler leadership in electric-drive vehicles and related advanced-propulsion technologies. (Earlier post.)

ENVI is to focus on executing Chrysler’s next-generation vehicles with technologies that complement the company’s current hybrid vehicle plans, and extend the benefits of hybrid electric vehicles (HEV) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV).

January 15, 2008 in Electric (Battery), Plug-ins | Permalink | Comments (34) | TrackBack (0)

Comments

More Flextreme pictures:
Jalopnik

(Note the spelling is not Flexstreme)
http://jalopnik.com/photogallery/saturnflextremepics/


Posted by: sjc | January 16, 2008 at 03:36 PM

There are a number of new engine designs that could be used and are much lighter than present piston types. Just to mention one, Axial Vector claims to have a 3 lb 5HP engine. They also have higher HP protos. These are smaller and lighter with higher fuel efficiency. Couple that with a PHEV and Crysler could come on fast.

Posted by: Ron | January 16, 2008 at 06:43 PM

The whole series hybrid interest opens up the possibility of different power plants to generate the electricity. Since you no long have to drive the wheels of the car with that mechanical force, other methods may emerge.

Posted by: sjc | January 16, 2008 at 08:42 PM

...hold on there Nymphirio!

...we could have the technology to run our cars on positive thoughts and Detroit would still find a way to hold it back...Chrysler Hybrids, Chevy Volt!?!? These are all romantic fantasies, they'll never see the light of day.

Posted by: Rory B. Bellows | January 18, 2008 at 09:42 AM

Hybrids,too much klim bim.Put super clean diesels in some of the existing models and start making money before another good company goes down the tube because of mismanagement.

Posted by: HHN | January 23, 2008 at 04:12 PM

We should forget "modular" batteries and require vehicle manufacturers to use the exact same battery in all vehicles made. Furthermore, the batteries should be removable. "Gas stations" providing "cylinder exchange" for your all-electric vehicle would greatly reduce battery production costs. One can envision charged batteries awaiting those wishing to drive further than the 40-100k currently available: allowing individuals to drive almost unlimited miles per day; paying only for the cost of the re-charge; providing their own battery as a "core return," and paying for the time of the individual plugging in your new battery. Just got off of a site: ocean-server.com which describes array monitoring technology and software which could be easily mounted on the batteries, ensuring a fully-charged battery was plugged into your vehicle. Hope someone sees this, can't think of anywhere else to post it so that it'll make a difference...

Posted by: Jamie Ball | January 23, 2008 at 08:13 PM

I don't think we should demand swappable battery packs.  This creates the same problem as hydrogen fuel:  who is going to be around to swap them until lots of vehicles use them, and who's going to buy such a vehicle without lots of places to swap them?  If we stick with plain old electricity at standard voltages (e.g. 480 V 60 Hz) the chicken/egg problem goes away.  Plain old lead-acid batteries can be charged in 15 minutes with special chargers, and today's chemistries (Altair Nano) and even lead-acid with better construction (Firefly Energy) can do much better.  Besides, with a battery designed to pop out, how do you keep it secure in a crash?

Specifying a small set of sizes and form factors would radically increase the market for PHEV batteries, allowing different manufacturers to play in the market for huge fleets of vehicles (like tires).  The problem is that the standard-setting process would delay the production by years.

Posted by: Engineer-Poet | January 26, 2008 at 06:59 PM

Forget the ICE trickle-charger. What we need is stations
where we can go to have our batteries switched out
every 400m. You just pull in, the attendant unplugs your
power pack and pops in a freshly charged pack. Quicker
than standing there pumping gas. I think that's the
solution they've come up with in Israel recently. Cost
will undoubtedly be cheaper than gasoline, and the station makes the same profit they did when they were selling poison. Electric cars are not that far off, now, with all of the new battery tech coming online. I think they're going to bypass alternate fuels entirely, except for where the electricity is generated. Unless, of
course, we get a pack that can be recharged in just a
few minutes.

Posted by: Swen | February 01, 2008 at 07:25 PM

We need the cars to keep their own batteries, with no foolish battery switching systems when the battery set is thousands of dollars.

A simpler infrastructure is available ... Just have "pay for it plugs" installed in every major shopping plaza and hotel parking lot. This could be installed today, and at a very very low cost. As soon as this type of infrastructure is organized, (and that only takes one major retailer to begin making "pay-plugs" available) PEV's are a viable transport system.

We don't need recharging stations with nothing to do at them. By the time you need a recharge, a meal/coffee and rest will be welcome.


Posted by: John Taylor | February 07, 2008 at 05:35 AM

Post a comment
[Please keep comments on topic. Disagreement is fine; insults, abuse or wild diversions are not. Comments not meeting those standards will be deleted. Abuse of another commenter’s email address will result in the banning of the offender from this site. In an attempt to prevent the posting of insulting and abusive comments, this site maintains a list of prohibited words and phrases, which, unfortunately, grows with time. Including one of the prohibited words or phrases will flag the comment as “spam”, and it will be blocked.]

Green Car Congress only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00e54ff3df1f8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Chrysler’s Three Electric Drive Concept Cars Highlight New Modular, Shared Systems Approach:

Green Car Congress © 2009 BioAge Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Home | BioAge Group