« GM to Reveal Cadillac Fuel-Cell Concept at Consumer Electronics Show | Main | Report Concludes that Canada Needs Economy-Wide Price Put on Carbon Emissions As Soon As Possible to Achieve 65% Reduction in GHG Emissions by 2050 »
Study Finds Net Energy of Cellulosic Ethanol from Switchgrass Much Higher Than Expected
7 January 2008
A five-year trial of switchgrass on farmland in the Midwestern United States found that the crop produces 540% more renewable energy as a biomass energy crop for cellulosic ethanol than energy consumed in its production. Previous estimates, based on small scale research plots (<5m2 and estimated inputs) suggested switchgrass would yield a net energy production of about 343%.
Estimated average greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from cellulosic ethanol derived from switchgrass were 94% lower than estimated GHG from gasoline. Kenneth Vogel at the US Department of Agriculture and the University of Nebraska, Lincoln, and his colleagues report their findings in an open access article in the current issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
The research team managed switchgrass as a biomass energy crop in field trials of 3–9 ha (1 ha = 10,000m2) on marginal cropland on 10 farms to determine net energy and economic costs based on known farm inputs and harvested yields.
The annual biomass yields of established fields averaged 5.2 -11.1 Mg·ha-1 with a resulting average estimated net energy yield (NEY) of 60 GJ·ha-1·y-1. Switchgrass monocultures managed for high yield produced 93% more biomass yield and an equivalent estimated NEY than previous estimates from human-made prairies that received low agricultural inputs.
One of the prime reasons for the improved yield was the actual lower energy inputs for biomass reported in comparison to the estimates previously reported. This highlights, the team noted in their paper, the “discrepancies that can occur when analyses are based on small-scale research plots and misassumptions.”
Cooperating farmers in the project were paid for their work and land use and documented all production operations and field biomass yields. The study provided five years of production and management information from each farm, which the researchers used to estimate net energy, petroleum inputs to ethanol outputs, and GHG emissions.
For an alternative transportation fuel to be a substitute for conventional gasoline, the alternative fuel should (i) have superior environmental benefits, (ii) be economically competitive, (iii) have meaningful supplies to meet energy demands, and (iv) have a positive NEV. The results of this study demonstrate that switchgrass grown and managed as a biomass energy crop produces >500% more renewable energy than energy consumed in its production and has significant environmental benefits, as estimated by net GHG emissions as well as soil conservation benefits.
It is expected that biomass conversion rates will be improved in the future because of both genetic modifications of biomass feedstocks and improvements in conversion technology, which should result in improvement in net energy for switchgrass.
Only a fraction of the research effort that has produced...significant improvements in corn genetics and management has been available for switchgrass and other potential perennial herbaceous biomass species. This is a baseline study that represents the technology available for switchgrass in 2000 and 2001, when the fields were planted.
...It is expected that further improvements in both genetics (hybrid cultivars, molecular markers) and agronomics (production system management practices and inputs) will be achieved for dedicated energy crops such as switchgrass, which will further improve biomass yields, conversion efficiency, and NEV. As an indicator of the improvement potential, switchgrass biomass yields in recent yield trials in Nebraska, South Dakota, and North Dakota (36–38) were 50% greater than achieved in this study.
Resources
Schmer, M. R., Vogel, K. P., Mitchell, R. B. & Perrin, R. K. “Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass”Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 464-469 (2008)
January 7, 2008 in Cellulosic ethanol | Permalink | Comments (31) | TrackBack (0)
Comments
Posted by: averagejoe | January 23, 2008 at 04:41 PM
Averagejoe: Thanks for the tip. www.rangefuels.com is worth visiting, but at the 20 kbps available to me here in the bush, it takes forever to download anything bar the first 2 pages. What I saw was most interesting, and when I get to a computer on broadband, I'll give it another go.
Thanks again.
Next question: Can you run a diesel engine on 100% ethanol?
Posted by: Dixon | January 23, 2008 at 08:57 PM
Dixon, I know the feeling. Slow internet connections can take forever and a day with graphics heavy webpages. You might find this website useful:
http://seebot.org/
Can't help you with the diesel engine question, but maybe someone more knowledgeable can comment. Good luck.
Posted by: averagejoe | January 24, 2008 at 01:03 AM
Averagejoe: Just been brought to my attention:
"CSIRO and Monash University have developed a chemical process that turns green waste into a stable bio-crude oil. The bio-crude oil can be used to produce high value chemicals and biofuels, including both petrol and diesel replacement fuels."
Worth a look at http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/02/080204094459.htm
Posted by: Dixon | February 04, 2008 at 04:44 PM
If one were to grow switch grass with hydroponics, you would not have the oil based produces involved in the process at all. All produces that are grown in soil will have to have fertilizer to boost the soil and pesticides which are both oil based. Unless you get rid of oil all together we will end up still relying on it to grow the crops switch grass. With that comes the run off from those oil based produces used to produce the crop, which pollutes our drinking and fishing waters, and the ground water, and there is the increase possibility of decease that could occur in growing the crop in soil. If we grow with hydroponics only there are no fertilizers and no pesticides and there will not be any residue left on the plants. With hydroponics there is an increased growth from being grown in both sun light and electrical lights, the water is reused so there is far less evaporation of the water, so we use far less water.
Posted by: P | May 03, 2008 at 04:44 PM
`You are kidding, aren't you? We need 100,000 thousand acres,(you do know how big an acre is?) to produce a mere one million gallons of cellulosic ethanol. Currently the US used four hundred billion gallons of gasoline per year and half that much diesel. I would like to see your plans for growing switchgrass using hydroponics. What means of fertilizer will you use? Or, are you gonna produce 10 tons of biomass per acre with water alone? A bit of advice....Stick with the production side and let the Agronomists worry about production issues.
Posted by: Randy King | July 02, 2008 at 07:09 PM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00e54fc480cf8833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Study Finds Net Energy of Cellulosic Ethanol from Switchgrass Much Higher Than Expected:

Twitter headlines


Dixon, Range Fuels Inc. has a biomass gasification system that is modular and portable... or so I've heard. Might be worth Googling.