« Survey: 75% of UK Drivers Would Buy a Car with Stop-Start System | Main | ISE Receives Order for 25 Gasoline Hybrid-Electric Drive Systems for Long Beach Buses »
Advanced Low Temperature Diesel Combustion: Low Emissions and Better Fuel Economy
29 April 2008
Researchers at Wayne State University and the US Army’s TARDEC (Tank-Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center) are proposing a strategy to reduce the penalties in diesel engine performance, fuel consumption and HC and CO emissions associated with a low temperature combustion (LTC) operating regimes.
LTC spans a number of approaches designed to reduce engine-out emissions of NOx and PM. The researchers devised an Advanced Low Temperature Combustion (ALTC) strategy to counter the downsides of one of those, the LTC Modulated Kinetics (LTC MK) approach. LTC MK reduces NOx and PM by burning a pre-mixed fuel-air charge, low in oxygen concentration, at low temperatures.
LTC MK accomplishes this by retarding injection timing to have combustion start late in the expansion stroke; applying high EGR rates; using medium injection pressures; and increasing the swirl ratio to increase the rate of burning. However, while NOx and PM are lowered, LTC MK causes fuel penalties, higher HC and CO emissions, and unstable engine operation. To address that, the researchers are proposing a four-step approach.
Combustion phasing. The first step advances the start of combustion (SOC) to improve fuel economy and to stabilize the operation of the engine. This also has the effect on increasing NOx and PM.
Increased EGR. To address the increased NOx, the second step is to increase Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) from 60 to 64%—made possible by the early combustion phasing in the first step. This results in an increase in PM emissions.
Increased injection pressure and/or swirl ratio. To deal with the increased PM, the third step they took was to increase injection pressure. In work presented at the recent 2008 SAE World Congress, they boosted pressure from 800 bar to 1,200 bar at a swirl ration of 1.44. Alternately, another approach is to maintain the 800 bar pressure and to increase the swirl ratio from 1.44 to 7.12.
The fourth step is to optimize the combustion phasing, injection pressure and swirl ratio to give targeted engine-out emissions and fuel consumption, with stable combustion and operation at different operating points.
In their paper at the SAE World Congress, the researchers noted:
...optimization should take into consideration the effect of varying LPPC [location of peak rate of heat release due to premixed combustion], EGR, injection pressure and swirl ratio on fuel economy and engine operation. For example, there is no need to go to the LTC regime at the part load used in this investigation...In such a case a lower rate of EGR can be applied, reducing the need to use higher injection pressures or swirl ratios. Producing higher injection pressures consumes more energy in driving the injection pump. Also, higher swirl ratios might affect fuel economy, because of the increase in heat losses...In addition, higher swirl ratios reduce the volumetric efficiency of the engine, increase the load on the cooling system and limit the power rating of the engine.
It should be noted also that the optimization should also take into consideration the effective operation of the aftertreatment devices under the different operating modes of the vehicle. Thus both the engine and aftertreatment devices should be treated as one system that is required to meet certain targets in engine performance, fuel economy and tailpipe emissions.
Resources
N. A. Henein, A. Kastury, K. Natti and W. Bryzik (2008) Advanced Low temperature COmbustion (ALTC): Diesel Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Emissions (SAE 2008-01-0652)
April 29, 2008 in Emissions, Engines, Fuel Efficiency | Permalink | Comments (5) | TrackBack (0)
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/22062/28611812
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Advanced Low Temperature Diesel Combustion: Low Emissions and Better Fuel Economy:
Comments
A more efficient approach would be to use a free piston design that had a dwell at TDC, so that combustion takes place under constant volume conditions.
Posted by: terry | Apr 29, 2008 6:36:45 PM
@ terry -
free piston designs actually have *less* dwell time at TDC and BDC. As for efficiency, that always suffers when you're trying to improve emissions.
Posted by: Rafael Seidl | Apr 30, 2008 5:32:02 PM
This is great, but it begs a question. Are they using research lab diesel...or the crap from the local pump?
Posted by: fred | Apr 30, 2008 11:38:01 PM
A scottish yoke has a different profile than a crank and would allow lower pumping losses. There are debates about whether a yoke is as efficient.
Posted by: SJC | May 1, 2008 11:52:22 AM
Combustion inside a cylinder should become obsolete. The biggest rolls-royce jet engines have a 30 to one compression ratio. Continuous combustion must eventually find its way into cars and trucks. Scuderi will have another reason to delay even having a prototype if they next promote a single pre combustion chamber for all pistons which is what the French air car promotor plans. Small turbines could be used in hybrid cars...HG...
Posted by: Henry Gibson | May 9, 2008 5:42:53 PM
