Green Car Congress
About GCC Contact  RSS Subscribe Twitter headlines

« Ford Developing Thermally Sprayed Nano-Coating for Cylinders to Reduce Friction, Support Lighterweight Construction | Main | GM To Introduce FlexFuel Version of 2009 Buick Lucerne »

Print this post

Aerodynamic Heavy-Duty Truck Trailer Cuts Fuel Consumption and Emissions By Up to 15%

17 April 2008

Trailer2
Trailer with aerodynamic sideskirts.

Creating an improved aerodynamic shape for heavy-duty truck trailers by mounting sideskirts can cut fuel consumption and emissions by up to 15%, according to road testing by the Dutch research partnership PART (Platform for Aerodynamic Road Transport). PART is a partnership between TU Delft, TNT, Scania Beers BV, FOCWA Carrosseriebouw, Ephicas, Kees Mulder Carrosserieën, Van Eck Carrosseriebouw, Syntens, Squarell Technology, Emons Group and NEA.

Sideskirts are plates which are mounted on the sides of trailers, primarily with a view to underrun protection. The new aerodynamic design of the sideskirts substantially reduces the air currents alongside and under the trailer and thereby also the air resistance.

Initial driving tests with a trailer equipped with the aerodynamic sideskirts over a straight stretch of public road revealed a cut in fuel consumption of between 5% and 15%. Subsequent research comprising long-term operational tests by TNT displayed a fuel reduction of 10%.

These results confirm calculations and findings from the wind tunnel tests that had established that the observed 14 - 18% reduction in air resistance led to 7 - 9% less fuel consumption. In practice, the figures are in fact even better.

PART expects that the cost of fitting aerodynamically-shaped sideskirts will be recouped within two years. Furthermore, the sideskirts can be fitted to approximately half the trucks currently in use in the Netherlands as the skirts can also be retrofitted.

In 2005, 10,000 new trailers were taken into use in the Netherlands. With an average fuel consumption of 30 liters per 100 kilometers [7.8 mpg US], that translates into 750 million liters of diesel consumption in the Netherlands each year. We can cut fuel consumption by 5% or more for 50% of those trailers. That means a reduction of 50 million tons of CO2 emissions a year. This research can therefore result in a substantial, structural contribution to cutting fuel consumption and an annual saving of tens of millions of Euros, next to that cut in CO2 emissions by the road transport sector.

Together with this sector we have created a practical platform for further research and development, but we still need active government participation. Just obtaining permits for all the road tests has involved a huge amount of time, energy and frustration. The next step is realizing a practical partnership between the government and industry in order to put the solutions into practice.

—Prof. Michel van Tooren of TU Delft’s Aerospace Engineering faculty

Road tests have also already been initiated on boat tails. These constructions on the rear of a trailer ensure a reduction in the wake—the vacuum and air currents which arise when the trailer is moving. In theory, a boat tail could also mean a cut in air resistance of 30%, with a fuel reduction of 10 - 15%. These road tests should also confirm the earlier, highly positive results from the windtunnel.

Boat tails, however, are limited in practical use, in particular when loading and unloading—safety aspects and problems with exceeding maximum vehicle sizes prevent these being used for many types of vehicles.

April 17, 2008 in Fuel Efficiency, Heavy-duty | Permalink | Comments (41) | TrackBack (0)

Comments

It took them this long to figure it out.
NASA Dryden had it figured out in the 1970's. It just took this long for people to get serious about it.

Posted by: Reality Czech | April 18, 2008 at 09:12 AM

So all the discussion says to me that the independent trucker pays the fuel, but has to haul someones fuel inefficient trailer. This is another example of do your own thing lack of coordination. Maybe truckers, shippers and government can come up with a way to share the costs for more efficiency. If you are an oil guy, the more you sell the more you make. If you are a citizen of the country, going to war for oil is not a good idea and working together makes more sense.

Posted by: sjc | April 18, 2008 at 10:09 AM

Robert Englar at Georgia Tech is the leading man in the world on this. Rounded top spoiler extension to top back of container. Front air dam on top of cab must be higher than trailer or its useless. Flexible bellows/ skirt between cab and trailer/ container. Easy, very low cost, very high fuel savings. Current trucks could hardly be less aerodynamic.

Posted by: Emphyrio | April 18, 2008 at 12:28 PM

It sounds a bit like the tenant landlord problem. The builder builds the house, but they do not pay the utility bills, so they put in the cheapest most inefficient appliances. Then the landlord buys the house and rents it. He does not have to pay the utility bills, so what does he care? Then the tenant moves in and has to pay the utility bills, would like to put in more efficient appliances, but it is not his house....and so it goes.

If the company owning the trailer does not have to buy the fuel, what do they care? They are not going to buy skirts and spoilers to save someone else money. The trucker will not buy them, he is cash strapped enough as it is....and so it goes. Selfishness overrides common sense in doing the right thing for all of us. Even if the trailer owners just care about themselves (and that is a good bet) then they should know that the costs for fuel are reflected in the fees that they are charged.

But maybe they can bid one trucker against another and find a Mexican trucker that will take less. Houses in Mexico cost less, so the money he sends home goes farther. If we continue with this national Walmartization and race to the bottom, that is exactly where we will end up...at the bottom and it will be very difficult to ever get up again. The Republicans believe that if everyone just minds their own business and takes care of themselves, then everything will be ok. Divide and conquer by pitting one against the other. No unity and team play because the team may talk with one another, figure out that they have been conned and taken and turn against the dividers.

Posted by: sjc | April 18, 2008 at 04:02 PM

I can find pictures of Walmart trailers with skirts but I've never seen any in the last 8 years and I'm on the road 100,000 miles a year. I wonder how something like this would work on a box truck.

Posted by: drivin98 | April 19, 2008 at 11:52 AM

I'd like to see how a 5% cut of 750 million liters could amount to 50 million tonnes of CO2 per year?!

With a density of approx. 0.9 kg/liter, they will be saving:

0.9*750*0.05 = 34 million kg diesel, which maybe equates to 50 million kg of CO2, but not tonnes. Makes a helluva difference...

Still, it's worth saving.

Posted by: Thomas Pedersen | April 19, 2008 at 02:23 PM

Electric car, the future but in the present.
www.blobject.es

Posted by: Jose Luis | April 20, 2008 at 04:29 PM

I seem to remember seeing a video where they reduced drag with a curtain that closed the gap between the tractor and the first trailor. This may have been 20 years ago.

Posted by: keith fuller | April 23, 2008 at 06:57 PM

This really sounds like a great idea, and one that should be implemented on all trucks possible. The only drawback I can see is who will pay for this. The big companies don't have to worry about the driver with his own tractor, and the Independents can hardly afford to pay their own bills, let alone beef up their trucks. Good luck and maybe someday?!

Posted by: Mary Leigh | April 24, 2008 at 06:05 AM

Sideskirts are well known in the UK but have peaks and troughs in popularity with distribution fleets.
Hatcher Components is a company that has been supplying aerodynamic kit for european trucks for around 30 years.
Website address is www.hatchercomp.co.uk

Posted by: Mike Barker | May 21, 2008 at 06:30 AM

I've heard there are ice build-up issues with side skirts. Does anybody have any information or experience regarding that issue?

Posted by: David | June 05, 2008 at 01:53 PM

"Within a few hours a PT- Boat pulled alongside and these officers came aboard the LCI. They pulled out this big map and informed us that tomorrow is going to be D- Day. Our outfit's orders are to assault a place on the French coast code- named Utah Beach. The attack was just a few hours away. / p "At five o'clock on the morning of June 6 the front of our transport went down and we were off. The ramp opened up 200 yards short of dry beach and we stepped out into shoulder- deep water. / p "I had just turned...

Posted by: bimini tops | June 26, 2008 at 12:09 PM

I have a novice question. I just returned from Europe where the trucks look very different than new trucks do in the U.S. Specifically I'm talking about port drayage trucks. I've seen photos of the new trucks they are bringing in at the ports of LA and Long Beach and they look like dinosaurs compared to the ones I saw at the Port of Hamburg. Are these just optics? Or is there some other reason? Does anyone know why? Which are more aerodynamic? Feel free to write me off line at mcsbjm@yahoo.com. Thanks!

Posted by: Barbara | July 14, 2008 at 10:49 AM

The problem with side skirts and boat tails are maintenance and liability costs. Driving over a steep rail road crossing or cutting over a curb can damage the skirt before it pays for itself. Any tail hanging on the back end of a trailer will easily get hit in a trailer parking lot due manuvering a long trailer in and out of tight places. To be any good, tails have to be rigid and if so, violate the DOT's trailer bumper strength requirements.

Posted by: Geoffrey | July 15, 2008 at 04:05 PM

Next your going to tell us that the same thing happened years before when you, a buddy and his brother in law (call them call them Tom and Wayne to protect the innocent) were fishing and Tom s pole fell off his lap.

Posted by: bimini tops | August 15, 2008 at 02:02 PM

That first one is the best one I've seen in the thread so far.
-Opslagruimte

Posted by: car rental brisbane airport | January 30, 2009 at 12:42 AM

Post a comment
[Please keep comments on topic. Disagreement is fine; insults, abuse or wild diversions are not. Comments not meeting those standards will be deleted. Abuse of another commenter’s email address will result in the banning of the offender from this site. In an attempt to prevent the posting of insulting and abusive comments, this site maintains a list of prohibited words and phrases, which, unfortunately, grows with time. Including one of the prohibited words or phrases will flag the comment as “spam”, and it will be blocked.]

Green Car Congress only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00e551f1fc638834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Aerodynamic Heavy-Duty Truck Trailer Cuts Fuel Consumption and Emissions By Up to 15%:

Green Car Congress © 2009 BioAge Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Home | BioAge Group