Green Car Congress
About GCC Contact  RSS Subscribe Twitter headlines

« Study: Air Pollution Diminishes Fragrance of Flowers | Main | GMZ Energy Announces Commercial Availability of More Efficient Thermoelectric Material »

Print this post

EPRI Analysis Shows Energy Efficiency Can Reduce Need for New Generation By 7% to 11%

22 April 2008

Energy efficiency improvements in the US electric power sector could reduce the need for new electric generation by an additional 7% to 11% more than currently projected over the next two decades if key barriers can be addressed, according to a preliminary analysis of potential energy savings released today.

Epri
Achievable potential savings. Click to enlarge.

The draft findings were presented by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) and the Edison Electric Institute (EEI) during an Edison Foundation conference, Keeping the Lights On: Our National Challenge, which examines strategies to meet the growing demand for electricity which is expected to soar 30% by 2030, according to the US Energy Information Administration.

That demand growth projection would be even higher without the implementation of existing building codes, appliance standards and market-driven consumer incentives, which will shave electricity consumption by 23%, according to the EPRI-EEI study. However, additional efficiency gains could be achieved only by overcoming major market, regulatory and consumer barriers, the analysis found.

This study demonstrates the potential of energy efficiency to offset some of the projected need for new electric generation as cutting-edge technologies become available and are adopted. We think a 7-percent efficiency improvement is realistic—and gains of 11 percent or more are technologically feasible—depending on the degree to which various obstacles can be overcome.

—Dr. Michael Howard, senior vice president at EPRI

Essential steps include increased consumer education; adoption and enforcement of aggressive building codes and appliance standards; creation of utility business models that promote increased efficiency within the power sector; and adoption of electricity pricing policies that more accurately reflect the cost of providing electricity to consumers and give them the information they need to use it wisely.

Diane Munns, executive director at EEI, said the power sector will seek the greatest efficiency gains possible, but cautioned that this will be no easy task and that utilities still must plan for substantial new generation and transmission to assure reliability.

Achieving efficiency improvements going significantly beyond those already in the pipeline will be a major undertaking. No matter how you slice it, we’ll have to build significant new generation to ensure that we meet demand. The greater gains we make in energy efficiency, the better off everyone will be, because we’ll have more cost-effective options for serving our customers. But if we overestimate what can be accomplished, we could find ourselves without an adequate supply of electricity to meet consumer needs.

—Diane Munns

Optimal electricity savings can be achieved only if the best available technologies are deployed throughout the US economy, EPRI and EEI said. Much of the research involved in realizing more efficiency is being conducted by EPRI at its Living Laboratory for Energy Efficiency in Knoxville, Tenn.

EPRI’s programs and collaborations that evaluate cutting-edge technologies have identified numerous opportunities to markedly improve energy efficiency through use of “smart” and highly efficient electrical devices. At the same time, consumers’ ever-increasing appetite for electricity-hungry devices—even with continuing efficiency improvements—will keep electricity demand on a steady upward trajectory. A 42-inch plasma television consumes two and a half times more energy (250 watts) than a standard 27-inch TV (100 watts). And while many large household appliances have become more efficient over the years, many smaller devices have not. Two 30-watt set-top television boxes, for example, may consume as much electricity as a large refrigerator.

While electricity rates will rise due to increasing across-the-board costs of producing electricity, energy efficiency improvements can help reduce some of these costs to consumers. To maximize utility investment in efficiency programs, energy efficiency must be treated as an energy resource on par with new generation.

—Diane Munns

The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) leads research, development and demonstration of technical and operational solutions in electricity generation, delivery and use. The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is the association of US shareholder-owned electric companies. Its members serve 95% of the ultimate customers in the shareholder-owned segment of the industry, and represent approximately 70% of the US electric power industry.

Resources

April 22, 2008 in Brief | Permalink | Comments (7) | TrackBack (0)

Comments

The VP said that conservation is just a personal virtue and not part of a national energy plan. Who are we to believe? An oil and natural gas guy that profits from more drilling or someone that does rigorous research and has no hidden agenda?

It is usually more cost effective to save energy than to produce it. This is just common sense and common sense has certainly been in short supply in recent years. California was able to cut 10% almost immediately when Enron was robbing them. Behavior and conservation can do wonders.

Posted by: sjc | April 22, 2008 at 08:56 AM

It is so easy to list things people should do:

use CFL's
Turn off TVs and Lights when not in use
Turn down the AC / heating
etc etc

The problem is to get people to do them.

Smart meters or energy monitors help (I have an energy monitor), but you end up nagging the family to turn things off, which may have consequences.

Replacing appliances with "A" rated ones will help, but more types of appliances need to be rated:

For instance, all computers should be rated on 1 scale, including laptops and desktops - this should show that desktops are power hogs and laptops are OK.

Also (as mentioned) set top boxes need to be rated as people leave these on all the time. I'm sure the manufacturers could make very low power standby modes if they were prodded to do so.

Some people will willingly economise, others need to be pushed to do so, or it must be made painless to do so.

Posted by: mahonj | April 22, 2008 at 09:07 AM

There was a statement made about efficiency. Car engines got better mileage and we ended up with SUVs. Homes had more efficient appliances and we ended up with monster homes. It is kind of like low fat food, people may eat more of it.

Behavior should be a natural thing. If you go against the natural tendencies you have conflict. CFL lights are something people can do and not even give up anything. They do not necessarily leave the lights on because they are CFL, they leave them on because they are careless.

People do not like nagging and nannies and they certainly do not want to be scolded by their governments. They want their cake and eat it too. They want that big comfortable car that gets great mileage and performs well. The first company to offer that to them might just win all the marbles.

Posted by: sjc | April 22, 2008 at 09:27 AM

sjc...If that 'big comfortable car that gets great mileage & performs well' ever comes along, then I will want that 'small car that gets double great mileage & performs well' too. Let the rich people of the world think smaller because the Earth is only 8000 miles in diameter.

Posted by: litesong | April 22, 2008 at 06:08 PM

This is almost definately a conservative estimate. Just as an example, we've made refrigerators twice as efficent as when the electrical consumption regulations were first enacted. Similar (don't have the exact numbers) have been done with air conditioning, washing machines, dryers, etc.

What they said about TVs--even a rather large LCD TV probably uses less electricity than the average CRT TV. Desktops are also increasingly being replaced by laptops which are much more efficent. Also, congress just basically mandated the phase-out of incandessants, which is huge. Also, smart grid tech will take a huge bite out of peak load electricity (and, consequently, natural gas consumption). We can do much better than 7% or 11%

Posted by: Dan A | April 22, 2008 at 07:44 PM

People can drive big or small cars, it is their choice. What people do not want is for a few people to tell everyone else that they must drive small cars. If a 4 passenger roomy sedan gets 30 mpg, that is not bad and people will fight you fiercely if you try to force them to drive small cars. If you want to drive a small car, that is your business.

Posted by: | April 22, 2008 at 10:16 PM

Already re-lamped totally to CFLs.

Little else is cost-effective w/o decades-long paybacks.

Hot climate, high humidity - evaporative coolers won't work, not going to spend $25,000 on a geothermal heat pump.

Everyone here installs the minimum efficiency central A/C or air-source heat pump, since at $0.07/kWh higher-efficiency units never make back ther higher initial cost.

We could save a lot of power here by subsidizing the extra cost of 18+ SEER central A/C units - but instead we subsidize solar PV installs.

Posted by: Bill | April 25, 2008 at 05:25 PM

Post a comment
[Please keep comments on topic. Disagreement is fine; insults, abuse or wild diversions are not. Comments not meeting those standards will be deleted. Abuse of another commenter’s email address will result in the banning of the offender from this site. In an attempt to prevent the posting of insulting and abusive comments, this site maintains a list of prohibited words and phrases, which, unfortunately, grows with time. Including one of the prohibited words or phrases will flag the comment as “spam”, and it will be blocked.]

Green Car Congress only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00e551f24ad68833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference EPRI Analysis Shows Energy Efficiency Can Reduce Need for New Generation By 7% to 11%:

Green Car Congress © 2009 BioAge Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Home | BioAge Group