« Toyota to Provide 78 Conventional Hybrid, Other Advanced Vehicles to G8 Summit | Main | GM Holden Considering Smaller Vehicle in Australia »
Argonne: China Making “Vast Progress” in Li-Ion Manufacturing Technology
8 June 2008
China is making “vast progress” in lithium-ion battery manufacturing technology, according to a review published earlier this year by Argonne National Laboratory under the sponsorship of the US Department of Energy’s Office of Vehicle Technologies (OVT).
The scope of the study, by Pandit G. Patil, was (1) to determine the state of the art and current production of lithium-ion batteries in China and (2) to develop recommendations for DOE with respect to battery benchmarking and testing of candidate batteries for use in hybrid and plug-in hybrid vehicles.
China is the largest country in the world, and its economy is growing rapidly. Because of the demand for world oil supplies, the United States is interested in the capabilities of Chinese manufacturers of motor vehicles to produce and use state-of-the-art, energy-efficient vehicles.
Although there are significant issues of competitive concern, there are also reasons to hope that multiple nations will have the ability to produce high-quality, interchangeable battery packs for future plug-in hybrid vehicles. The Chinese government is developing its industry and universities to carry out the research and development (R&D) in lithium-ion battery technology for portable and electric vehicle applications. An estimated 400 organizations in China are involved in battery development or manufacturing; however, manufacturers of lithium-ion batteries represent an unknown fraction of this total.
Among the findings of the report on the state of the Li-ion industry in China are:
From 2001 to 2004, the number of battery companies in China increased from 455 to 613; accordingly, the number of employees in those industries also increased from 140,000 in 2001 to 250,000 in 2004. The total output reached 63.416 billion Yuan ($8.1 billion) in 2004, which is an increase of 52.58% over 2001.
In the past three to four years, companies outside of the Peoples Republic of China (PRC) have been bringing advanced battery technologies to the PRC and setting up partnerships and/or joint ventures to manufacture batteries for these and other applications (such as electric bikes, EVs, and HEVs) to take advantage of low labor cost and incentives provided by the Chinese government. Companies in the PRC are very aggressive in developing manufacturing processes for the batteries export market.
The sales of large-scale companies in the battery industry was 59.818 billion Yuan ($7.65 billion) in 2004—an increase of 52.85% in comparison with 2003, an increase of 105.32% in comparison with 2002, and an increase of 160.93% in comparison with 2001.
This growth is attributed to the growth of large companies. In the last four years, the debt-to-asset ratio of China’s battery industry has been fluctuating between 54 and 59%. The most commonly used battery industry standards in China for testing and evaluating battery technologies are those from the International Electrical Commission (IEC).
Along with the rapid growth of lithium-ion battery manufacturers in China, companies like the BYD Company Limited; Tianjin Lishen Battery Joint- Stock Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd.; and Shenzhen B&K Technology Co., Ltd., are increasing their share of the market. In 2004, the domestic and overseas markets for lithium-ion batteries were flourishing—the export volume was 189 million units, with an increase of 16.3% in sales. As a result of the rapid increase in domestic demand, the import volume of lithium-ion batteries was 550 million units, with an increase of 23.43% in sales in 2004.
At present, Chinese lithium-ion battery manufacturing companies are relatively well developed. Such manufacturers as the BYD Company Limited; Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd.; and Shenzhen B&K Technology Co., Ltd., enjoy a large share of the global battery market.
During 2003–2004, the Chinese lithium-ion battery industry developed dramatically. The production of cobalt acid lithium and nickel acid lithium and the invention of new manufacturing techniques to extract lithium from salty lakes will drastically reduce the need to import anode materials for lithium batteries from abroad.
Most Chinese companies are producing lithium-ion batteries for portable applications. Large companies have undertaken research and development with the help of joint ventures and/or partnerships with companies from Japan, Europe, and the United States. These companies, which include BYD Company Limited; EMB; GBP; Suzhou Phylion Battery Co., Ltd.; Xingheng; Tianjin Lantian; Tianjin Lishen Battery Joint-Stock Co., Ltd.; Beijing Green Power; and CITIC Guoan MGL, are developing lithium-ion batteries for e-bike, EV, and HEV applications—with particular focus on EVs and e-bikes. E-bikes have been by far the most successful battery electric vehicle application in history, with an estimated cumulative production of ~30 million by 2007.
Lithium resources are abundant in China. As of 2000, China was the second largest producer of lithium in the world, and in 2004, it produced 18,000 metric tons.
The rechargeable lithium battery is a new technology in the energy field supported greatly by the Chinese government. Since the initiation of China’s “863 Program” in 1987, the Ministry of Science and Technology has organized the research and development of the key materials and technologies for NiMH and lithium-ion batteries. These batteries are produced on a large scale, particularly for export.
In its new five-year plan (2006–2010), the Chinese government outlines steps to boost efficiency and reduce pollution. A number of clear targets for increasing energy efficiency are set (e.g., to increase total energy efficiency by 20% and to achieve an energy mix of at least 20% renewable energy by 2020).
On the whole, the PRC is making vast progress in manufacturing lithium-ion battery technology. The government has a national program in place to attract foreign companies to set up joint ventures and/or partnerships with Chinese companies. The Chinese government offers large incentives to Chinese companies that produce batteries for export. The Chinese government also gives Chinese-owned companies additional incentives to conduct research and provides capital for manufacturing lithium-ion batteries for all applications.
Specific companies and organizations highlighted in the report include:
CITIC Guoan MGL. MGL is China’s largest manufacturer of the conventional cathode material LiCoO2, and it will be the first to market the new cathode materials LiMn2O4 and LiCoO0.2Ni0.8O2.
MGL emphasizes quality control, and has passed the certification of both New and Hi-Tech Enterprise standards and IS09001:2000. With its own synthesis method, MGL claims it produces cathode materials of superior performance and reliability in an environmentally friendly way.
Besides cathode materials, MGL also produces lithium-ion secondary batteries of high energy density and high capacity for power and energy storage—the capacity ranges from several ampere-hours to several hundred ampere-hours. As China’s first power battery manufacturer, MGL leads in marketing high-capacity lithium-ion secondary batteries, which are used in the Beijing Municipality’s trial electric bus fleet.
Tianjin Lishen Battery Joint-Stock Co., Ltd., was established in 1998. Lishen has a capitalization of 600 million Ren Min Bi (RMB) ($80.00 million), and a total investment of 1.5 billion RMB ($200.00 million). The production of lithium cells is completely automatic—representing the most automated production line for lithium-ion batteries in China. The production equipment is imported from Japan.
Suzhou Phylion Battery Co., Ltd., is a battery technology corporation set up by Legend Capital Co., Ltd.; the Institute of Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences; and Chengdu Diao Group. Suzhou Phylion Battery Co., Ltd., has 82 million RMB ($10.93 million) and a staff of more than 400. The company specializes in manufacturing and selling lithium-ion cells with high capacity and current. Its technology is primarily used in defense, electric bicycles, lighting, portable electronics, medical equipment, and battery-operated tools.
Tianjin Institute of Power Sources. Established in 1985, the institute is one of the two national laboratories involved in battery testing and evaluation activities and programs. It is considered the largest, most comprehensive, most authoritative, independent quality-testing center for chemical and physical power sources.
Tongji University, School of Automotive Engineering. Tongji University has world-class facilities to integrate advanced batteries and fuel cells in vehicles and to conduct basic and applied research for the automotive industry. These testing capabilities cover research, testing, and evaluation. The school is collaborating research with lithium battery development companies, fuel cell development companies, and domestic and foreign automobile companies.
GRINM. The General Research Institute for Nonferrous Metals (GRINM) is the largest research and development (R&D) institution in the field of nonferrous metals industry in China. GRINM is conducting basic research on the materials needs and requirements for high-energy and high-power lithium-ion battery technology.
GRINM has focused on nanotechnology and LiMn2O4 materials for the cathode, graphite for the anode, and PC+DC+DMC+1m LiPF6 liquid electrolyte and polypropylene/polyethylene/polypropylene separator for the development of a lithium-ion battery cell. GRINM developed all materials in-house except for the separator, which GRINM imports from Japan and the United States.
Patil concludes the review with recommendations for a morethoroughh first-hand review by the DOE, and to make arrangements for benchmarking Chinese battery technology in the United States.
Chinese companies have expressed a strong interest in making battery technology available for benchmarking. The timing is right, and interest in working with the United States is very strong.
Resources
Pandit G. Patil (2008) Developments in Lithium-Ion Battery Technology in The Peoples Republic of China (ANL/ESD/08-1)
June 8, 2008 in Batteries, China | Permalink | Comments (47) | TrackBack (0)
Comments
Posted by: George | June 09, 2008 at 12:35 AM
You guys summarily bashing China, Russia, Mexico, Brasil, etc. better wake up. These countries made over last 20 years amazing leap forward in economic, social, and yes – human rights development and enduring basic freedoms and rights for their vast population. Such progress for 1/3 of humanity is unprecedented in human history.
Have a decency to admire such progress.
Posted by: Andrey Levin | June 09, 2008 at 02:00 AM
@Axil,
"The reason so many died in the quake was due to corrupt Communist bureaucrats allowing buildings under code."
Corruption exists in all kinds of government. They do have in place a system to deter - a bullet to the back of the head but we decry such unhuman right. Maybe we should just live and let live.
Posted by: | June 09, 2008 at 03:53 AM
So what?
China is an industrial nation, lithium-ion batteries are an "hot" technology, they want to produce them.. good business.
I can't see them having a huge advantage here, as I guess the processes and the material are affecting the final cost more than labor.
Posted by: Alessio | June 09, 2008 at 04:43 AM
I think this thread is off-topic; it started with batteries based on lithium electrochemistry but now has evolved into a debate over the present regime in mainland China.
If the Chinese automotive engineering establishment can make progress in getting the cost of Li-ion batteries down, everyone - Chinese or not - will benefit. The present Toyota Prius, which in its latest form has been with us since 2003 (earlier versions of course date to 1997), still uses nickel-metal hydride batteries. Recently I saw a Think! electric car with a high temperature nickel-sodium chloride (Zebra) battery. Both cars would benefit from a lithium battery.
As for the political situation: Frankly, given that we Americans are having a hard time in Iraq and Afghanistan, I would just as soon that we not intervene between the people of mainland China and their regime. It may be tyrannical, but is China any worse off than Germany under Adolph Hitler, the Soviet Union under Josef Stalin, Cuba under Fidel Castro, or Saudi Arabia under their regime?
Posted by: Alex Kovnat | June 09, 2008 at 05:20 AM
I see a lot of people complaining about China and comparing them to the USA
Hu vs Bush
Storm vs Earthquake.
USA under built levies. The Corps of engineers will get paid huge sums of money to under-build the levies again (or just get paid and study the problem).
China under built a school. China will actually punish the school builder.
USA had a Katrina help effort that was an unmitigated disaster. People are in temporary homes still. The area is not fixed years later.
China's initial response was massive, quick, and well organized. The danger of 'quake lakes' was noted and is being dealt with. People are in tents for the summer, but tents will not be suitable for winter.
Lets see what area is restored first. My bet is on the Chinese.
Now back to Lithium Batteries. I for one am happy to see a forward looking nation doing research into advanced battery technology. Argonne's study of the Lithium battery industry is focused on China for good reason. This is one area the Chinese cannot steal others technology, because no others have this technology.
Say ,, “Ni Hao,” the new world leader is about to arrive, and will be driving an Electric car with Chinese made Lithium batteries.
Posted by: John Taylor | June 09, 2008 at 06:03 AM
I bet the secret ingredient in their Li-ion batteries is sodium hexametaphosphate.
Posted by: DS | June 09, 2008 at 06:09 AM
Here in ptown most of our schools are at least 60yrs old,some a 100 and not even built with rebar but are still in use today, sure hope we don't have a big one anytime soon. As far as batteries are concerned what would be nice is if the D.O.E. and nrel and argonne and what ever entities involved out there would take all that R&D money thier spreading around and spend it on the best case technology we have available now and get it out so we all could use it? Of course the lobbiest that actually run our great democracy would never stand for it.
Posted by: David | June 09, 2008 at 09:43 AM
I sincerely hope the Chinese continue with their "Get it Done!!" attitude and don't follow the US model of obstruction, obfuscation and vilification. The more auto Sized Li-Ion battery packs make it out into the world, the better off the world will be for the future. The US govt is very inefficient in getting real work done in this area.
Shame on the people who expect a 5,000 year old country to have all buildings constructed to US earthquake standards. Especially when much of the last century was spent in poverty and turmoil; Unlike the US. There are some problems with construction standards on some schools acknowleged, but it's unfair to paint with such a broad brush.
Posted by: | June 09, 2008 at 09:46 AM
@ All,
Interpreting this news is very subjective.
For consumers: Good news, though not guaranteed to be great.
For US economic nationalists: Disconcerting news, because China has more engineers, and more raw lithium, and this is bound to be a strategic technology.
For environmentalists: maybe mixed. Perhaps the US will try harder because of this news.
For engineers: Mixed. This may, or may not, provide vehicle grade lithium batteries with the right characteristics, including cost, to dramatically ramp up replacement of ICE vehicles.
Posted by: Healthy Breaze | June 09, 2008 at 11:43 AM
No one said the Chinese are stupid, just sneaky. If they can build a better mouse trap then more power to them.
Anyway, I think we should all join hands and sing the Chinese national anthem. Ah one...and ah two...and ah three.....
Posted by: shigley | June 09, 2008 at 01:26 PM
By the way, was the Toyota Prius and its reliable hybrid technology developed in the USA and then stolen by the Japanese?
So Americans work hard and save and Asians lend money to consume American goods and buy houses from each other?
I forgot, in what country does the housing and credit crisis take place - is it Japan or China or what?
Posted by: Proud American | June 09, 2008 at 03:19 PM
Anyone surprised?
A trillion dollars in surplus and they are going to cut the throats of the rest of the auto industry. They want to be the best at what ever cost.
Posted by: Paul | June 09, 2008 at 05:34 PM
The credit and housing crisis primarly took place in the US and Europe. There may be other countries but I can't be sure.
The Japanese are very focused and use their national pride to build quality and spearhead research and development, while getting Americans to go in the same direction is like herding cats. As for our national pride, well, all one needs to do is read this forum to know that it is slowly eroding.
Posted by: shigley | June 09, 2008 at 09:18 PM
BYD will have their plug-in hybrid with lithium-iron-phosphate batteries and 60 miles electric only range in the showrooms for sale in about 18 months time.
Posted by: clett | June 10, 2008 at 07:28 AM
"herding cats". LOL. How apropos.
Posted by: swen | June 10, 2008 at 01:25 PM
@ Proud American:
No one commented about the Japanese stealing our
tech. There was a comment about the Chinese stealing
our tech. There was not even an "Asians" stealing
our tech.
Regarding the Japanese: The Japanese are very innovative, and when there is something developed Stateside that we never use, it seems the Japanese will find an application for the technology and improve it and actually begin to produce it. Never read "Japanese for Chinese" and then build a straw-man argument.
Chinese and Japanese governments and attitudes toward Intellectual Property are quite different.
Posted by: swen | June 10, 2008 at 01:36 PM
Of course, Americans are the best.
Many just haven't yet figured out the concept:
Don't spend money you don't have - especially when you cannot afford it.
Posted by: | June 10, 2008 at 01:50 PM
"For all the bad things people say about our kids
not being as good at Math or Science, remember that
technology is born in the United States. Unfortunately,
there is a lag in the *use* of technology here.
Usually, we invent it, and the other countries actually
*use* it. Everything we invent, usually they steal, then improve, and then actually use."
Well sadly that means the USA is on the way down.
Why?
The same used to be said of Britain i.e. "we invent everything but the Americans improve on it and go on to make millions while we spin our wheels".
In any case, I'm happy SOMEONE is building masses of Li-Ion factories. While we debate and lobby about whether the technology is ready, China will be manufacturing and selling EVs and we will one day wake up and be able to buy them at a local dealership only they won't be from GM, Ford or Chrysler, they'll likely be from "Happy Dragon Motors" or somesuch.
Posted by: db | June 11, 2008 at 02:08 AM
@ db
"China will be manufacturing and selling EVs and we will one day wake up and be able to buy them at a local dealership only they won't be from GM, Ford or Chrysler, they'll likely be from "Happy Dragon Motors" or somesuch."
Happy Dragon sounds nice. I prefer Ching Lung (racing dragon).
---------------------------
swen.
Posted by: swen | June 13, 2008 at 09:39 AM
Clett:
You may be very close with your BYD assumption.
If only WalMart +++ would sell them, they would have many takers.
Bet you that Big 3's and AAW's lobbies will find ways to block their import for years. We won't admit it but that's how mature democracies work.
Posted by: HarveyD | June 13, 2008 at 06:54 PM
Hello, I am Mr ISC the director of SCMA Abidjan Cote d'Ivoire.
I need company like you, who can be able to manufacturs good qulity auto Battery, they are numbers as follows:
66 AH 12-V
55 AH 12-V
70 AH 12-V
72 AH 12-V
74 AH 12-V
88 AH 12-V
120 AH 12-V
Pls when you reply my mail, I want you to give me your company price list of the Battery Number's which I listed here above.
Thanks
Best Regards
Mr Isc.
NB: infact I love the law's given regards to this site, it will protect too much spam's and also it help for the right people whom are ready to transact business with people rigistered in this site.
Posted by: SCMA S.A.R.L | September 11, 2008 at 06:28 PM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00e5532ecaef8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Argonne: China Making “Vast Progress” in Li-Ion Manufacturing Technology:

Twitter headlines
ejj wrote: If the Chinese want to be the next EEStor, but actually create a product that lives up to its claims, fantastic! Viva high global energy prices! Stop looking for government to provide all the answers Neil.
Ejj, our government encourages 19th century technology, and the Chinese government shoots for the 21st. Eventually we'll buy everything from Asia, and we won't know how to do anything except farming. Then you can decide how your Libertarian ideology worked out.
You guys who think that China steals all our technology better look again. They are starting to do stuff on their own. Serious R&D. Don't underestimate them.