« 30 US Cities to Measure and Report GHG Emissions | Main | Iran to Double Production of Dual-Fuel CNG Vehicles This Year »
Study: Unconventional Natural Gas Resources Boost US Reserves to 118 Years Worth at Current Production Levels
11 August 2008
![]() |
| NCI’s estimate of proved and recoverable resources is significantly larger than other estimates. Results from the NCI study are represented in the right-most bar. Click to enlarge. |
A study released by the American Clean Skies Foundation (ACSF) and conducted by Navigant Consulting, Inc. (NCI) concludes that the United States has 2,247 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of natural gas proved reserves and unproved technically recoverable resources, including major contributions from unconventional resources from three sources: tight sands, coalbed methane and especially from shale. Reserves at that level would supply natural gas for 118 years at current production levels, according to the report.
After nine years of no net growth in US natural gas production through 2006, production in the Lower 48 states made a large upward shift. Production grew 3% between first-quarter 2006 and first-quarter 2007, followed by an exceptionally large 9% increase between first-quarter 2007 and first-quarter 2008, according to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA).
Total US natural gas production reached 19.3 Tcf/year (52.9 Bcf/day) by the end of 2007, a 4.3% increase over the 18.5 Tcf/year (50.7 Bcf/day) level at the end of 2006. Over the last decade, production from unconventional sources has increased almost 65%, from 5.4 Tcf/year (14.8 Bcf/day) in 1998 to 8.9 Tcf/year (24.4 Bcf/day) in 2007. Unconventional production has increased from 28% of total production in 1998 to 46% in 2007.
The EIA ascribes the sudden increase in production to the improved technology, developed over many years, that now allows economic production of resources in deep water and large unconventional resources, which are difficult to produce. High and increasing natural gas prices have spurred more natural gas drilling and the trend to move from drilling simpler vertical wells to horizontal wells. Horizontal drilling is fast becoming the primary method used to produce gas from geologic formations like shale.
As one indicator of the transition from conventional to unconventional production, the number of rigs drilling horizontal wells has grown to 519 rigs (28% of the total) from about 40 rigs (6% of the total) in the late 1990s. In the Barnett Shale in Texas, the wells go down about a mile and a half, make a turn and go horizontally about a mile, running through the rocks that hold natural gas.
The EIA has historically underestimated and understated the contribution and potential of unconventional natural gas, according to the ACSF, which engaged NCI to develop a comprehensive assessment of the current state of North American natural gas production, with a particular focus on analyzing the future of rapidly expanding natural gas production from unconventional formations such as shale.
The assessments and estimates on natural gas supply are very impressive and have, frankly, caught industry forecasters off guard. The extent of this ramp-up has not been fully captured by many reserve estimators, probably because their emergence has been too rapid for existing models to capture accurately.
—Rick Smead, study co-author and project manager for NCI
![]() |
| US natural gas shale basins and gsa pipeline networks. Click to enlarge. |
The study found that while all three unconventional gas sources have increased production over the past decade, natural gas production from shale formations is growing exponentially, increasing from less than a billion cubic feet a day in 1998 to about 5 billion cubic feet a day currently—a compound annual rate of growth of more than 20%, and more than 600% for the time period.
There are approximately 22 shale basins located onshore in more than 20 states in the US including Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, West Virginia, Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, New York and Michigan.
NCI’s researchers formulated the study’s snapshot of domestic natural gas reserves by analyzing production and reserve data by basin and by type of gas on as current a basis as possible. Sources included studies, state agencies responsible for minerals management, and corporate investor data, as well as direct outreach to more than 60 large natural gas producers nationwide. Researchers then compared this snapshot with current models including ones produced by the US EIA.
Recent technological innovation has transformed the natural gas exploration and production industry, particularly as it pertains to shale. The findings in this study indicate significant potential for expanded use of domestically produced natural gas for many purposes, including power generation and even transportation fuel for many years to come.
—Dr. Kenneth B. Medlock III, co-author and professor of economics at Rice University
Resources
August 11, 2008 in Natural Gas | Permalink | Comments (30) | TrackBack (0)
Comments
Posted by: NorthtexasDriller | August 12, 2008 at 07:42 PM
@ NorthTexasDriller
RTFQ
Will the US demand for NG continue to increase faster than domestic natural gas production?
Meeting increased demand for electricity by importing fuel is wrong on so many levels. First, the US has lots of coal. Second, the price of natural gas becomes more volatile. If Spain has a drought, the cost of making electricity in Oregon should not double.
Third, natural gas is a feedstock for many other industries. Forth, sending money to loons is not a good idea if we have to worry about them using money to buy weapons. How is comrade Putin doing these days?
Just 10 years ago, the natural gas industry claimed their was enough $1.50/MMBTU natural gas to last 65 years and told us not to worry because LNG provided the ceiling at $4.00/MMBTU. The natural gas industry promoted the use of natural to the point where it has seriously hurt US industry and cost lots of people their jobs. $8.50/MMBTU is good for you but bad for almost everyone else outside of the energy industry.
Posted by: Kit P | August 13, 2008 at 10:43 AM
LNG would provide cap BUT the LNG terminals needed for the imports have been blocked buy...you guesses it the environmentalists. Thus the push for CNG imports its cheaper over short distances and offloading can be done offshore on buoys in international waters where the environmentalists have no legal standing to sue on. LNG can be done in deep water with a floating platform but it’s significantly more expensive than shore based terminals. Shale gas and tight sand gas is going to be considered a conventional resources soon because the technology has progressed to the point where it costs little more than a conventional gas rig. The amounts of tight gas, shale gas and coal bed methane’s are enormous more than enough to meet demand we just have to drill for it and drill with gusto. The Barnett has 250 trillion cubic feet, the Marcellus shale has 500, the Fayetteville shale, and the Bakken shale’s cover similar geology and areas so there estimated to contain vast amounts of gas as well. The key technologies have been horizontal drilling and coil on tube rigs along with new methods of hydrofracture. Shale plays can and will meet the energy needs as for gas ever going below $4 mmbtu not likely gas is tied to oil as long as oil is high gas will be too.
Posted by: NorthtexasDriller | August 14, 2008 at 03:50 PM
Thanks for the info.
Posted by: Kit P | August 15, 2008 at 07:40 AM
It is now time to start installing hydrogen delivery pipes. Hydrogen can be made from coal. Forget about speculation in the market.
The advantage of a CNG car is that you can make the fuel at home with simple means from stuff bought or donated from grocery stores. see ARTI and PHILL ..HG..
Posted by: Henry Gibson | August 25, 2008 at 11:03 PM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00e553ddd5e18833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Study: Unconventional Natural Gas Resources Boost US Reserves to 118 Years Worth at Current Production Levels:

Twitter headlines


Looks like CNG imports are going to displace some of the LNG imports anyways its just so much cheaper to compress gas than to liquify it at distaces less than 2500 miles. There is like 3 pentillion cubic feet of stranded conventional gas ready to get to market rather than be flared off as it is currently done thats 10^15 BTW a huge amount.
http://www.spegcs.org/attachments/studygroups/6/CNG_vs_LNG.ppt
The Barnett has an estimated 500 tillion cubic feet in place with recovery rates of 20% right now but this is new technology oil only averages 20% world wide and new EOR technologies now can go upwards of 75% so GasShale recovery rates will no doubt increase at similar lifecycle rates.