Green Car Congress
About GCC Contact  RSS Subscribe Twitter headlines

« Toyota Releases “Sustainability Report 2008”, Looks to “Liquid Peak” | Main | Kia To Launch New Urban Crossover with Gasoline and Diesel Engines »

Print this post

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A Publishes Special Issue on Geo-engineering

2 September 2008

The journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A has published a special theme issue on geo-engineering in response to climate change. Philosophical Transactions, published by the UK’s Royal society, is the world’s longest-running scientific journal; the first issue appeared in March 1665.

In their introduction to the issue themed “Geoscale Engineering to Avert Dangerous Climate Change” Brian Launder and J. Michael T. Thompson, both of the University of Manchester, and who compiled the issue, wrote:

While the link between rising global temperatures and increasing atmospheric concentrations of CO2 has been known for more than a century, there is increasingly the sense that governments are failing to come to grips with the urgency of setting in place measures that will assuredly lead to our planet reaching a safe equilibrium. Today, the developed world is struggling to meet its (arguably inadequate) carbon-reduction targets while emissions by China and India have soared. Meanwhile, signs suggest that the climate is even more sensitive to atmospheric CO2 levels than had hitherto been thought.

Alarmed by what are seen as inadequate responses by politicians, for a number of years some scientists and engineers have been proposing major ‘last-minute’ schemes that, if properly developed and assessed in advance, could be available for rapid deployment, should the present general concern about climate change be upgraded to a recognition of imminent, catastrophic and, possibly, irreversible increases in global temperatures with all their associated consequences. While such geoscale interventions may be risky, the time may well come when they are accepted as less risky than doing nothing.

The above sets out the main elements that have led Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A to publish a Theme Issue on such macro-engineering options and to subject them to critical appraisal by acknowledged experts from around the world.

The issue has three parts, the first of which provides a historical and philosophical overview combined with projections of future CO2e levels and the foreseen capacity (or limitations) of conventional sequestration. The section, on indirect sequestration, gives examples of two of the approaches to limiting CO2 growth, whether by ‘recycling’ or removal of carbon to the ocean depths. The third section, Albedo Enhancement, presents two schemes for raising the proportion of incoming sunlight reflected back into space.

Resources

September 2, 2008 in Brief | Permalink | Comments (5) | TrackBack (0)

Comments

How about un-engineering. Sand in the engines of coal trains.

Posted by: RoySV | September 02, 2008 at 07:45 AM

I think future generations will laugh about our current preoccupation with Iran's nuclear program, and indifference towards the massive expansion of Chinese and Indian pulverized coal burning powerplants, that are releasing massive amounts of greenhouse gases, carbon black, sulfur dioxide, and radioactive particles.

Posted by: MeanandGreen | September 02, 2008 at 09:18 AM

I do not disagree with you, Mean, but you do offer no suggestions.
Think how future generations will wail if we bomb China and India to pulverized their coal burning powerplants while remaining indifference towards Iran's nuclear program, which by then may have unleashed massive amounts of radioactive death.

Posted by: ToppaTom | September 02, 2008 at 05:26 PM

Albedo enhance-ment comes in with the theory of global-dimming, but in that case it was accidental and in this case, deliberate. Whether to put up in orbit a whole bunch of reflectors or just to put sulfer in the air to a whole bunch of other methods.

Now that's a business venture. First we aren't willing to control the pollution that we create because of the cost, so let's create other businesses to create a different type of pollution to compensate for the effects of the first. It's a money pit and it's rightly described as a bunch of last minute schemes.

The efficacy of these at the point people will be willing to fund them will be questionable. I'm sure that if the evidence becomes so incontroversial that AGW is well under way, these technologies will be used as an excuse to keep the same old technologies that created the situation in the first place, instead of changing. There's a huge amount of weirdness in the human race, that it keeps trying band-aid solutions.

Posted by: aym | September 02, 2008 at 05:30 PM

"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" - Hunter S Thompson

Posted by: arnold | September 03, 2008 at 04:07 AM

Post a comment
[Please keep comments on topic. Disagreement is fine; insults, abuse or wild diversions are not. Comments not meeting those standards will be deleted. Abuse of another commenter’s email address will result in the banning of the offender from this site. In an attempt to prevent the posting of insulting and abusive comments, this site maintains a list of prohibited words and phrases, which, unfortunately, grows with time. Including one of the prohibited words or phrases will flag the comment as “spam”, and it will be blocked.]

Green Car Congress only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef00e554d8dd248833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A Publishes Special Issue on Geo-engineering:

Green Car Congress © 2009 BioAge Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Home | BioAge Group