« RTEV and Shuanghuan Automobile Form EV Partnership | Main | Valence to Provide Li-Ion Batteries to Brammo for Electric Motorcycle »
Altairnano to Receive Additional $4M for Li-ion Battery Deployment for Naval Vessel
20 November 2008
Altair Nanotechnologies Inc. and the United States Navy were granted an additional $4 million for the continued funding of a 2.5-Megawatt lithium-ion battery stationary power supply program. Total funds appropriated by Congress for Altairnano’s naval battery program now total $12.5 million. (Earlier post.)
Altairnano’s program with the United States Navy focuses on developing, testing, and deploying an Altairnano battery as an uninterruptible power supply (UPS) on Navy missile destroyers enabling single generator operations.
The application, which utilizes the battery’s long life cycle and broad temperature operating range, is anticipated to create a safe, less costly, and environmentally sustainable substitute for fuel turbines, resulting in an annual fuel cost savings in excess of $1.5 million per ship.
(A hat-tip to Richard!)
November 20, 2008 in Brief | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Comments
Posted by: Henry Gibson | November 20, 2008 at 09:34 AM
The Zebra battery is not the right answer for cars, it has a strong internal resistance, need to be keep at 250C which consume at least 10% of it is energy, so the returned energy is not good at all. If it accidentally cool down it takes 2 days to be re-heated, how can it be practical ? no way
Posted by: Treehugger | November 20, 2008 at 11:45 PM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef01053602eaac970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Altairnano to Receive Additional $4M for Li-ion Battery Deployment for Naval Vessel:

Twitter headlines



The ZEBRA battery is a well tested, long lived and fire proof battery that is built from common ordinary materials and has similar if not better energy storage capacity to Li batteries. It can be cooled with simple air circulation at the highest possible air temperatures and can continue to operate with many failed cells. It has been tested in hybrid locomotives and trucks as well as cars and buses for over ten years and is now being used in a NATO submarine rescue vehicle in the UK. The cells need no special protection from over currents either on charging or discharging. It is being actively marketed by Rolls-Royce for naval vehicles. Li batteries are too big a danger and too costly for naval vehicles. An array of several small diesel engines can be more energy and fuel efficient than any battery system.
No naval vessel should ever have only one turbine and in fact should not rely upon turbines for ordinary running at all because they have too low an efficiency at full load and much worse efficiency at part load. There are ways to improve part load efficiency, but multiple engines with electric drive will always be more reliable and efficient. Modern piston engine technology and high fuel costs have eliminated the practical use of turbines in sea going vessels of any type.
In the last few years, at least three generating stations have been built in the US with more than ten gas powered engines each so that any amount of power up to the full capacity can be generated at high efficiency. For very cheap operation, gas could be made from coal or coal coke or even biomass charcoal. With computer control and high power silicon or silicon carbide electronics now very cheap, there may be no reason to have an engine generator with more than one piston. Arrays of such single piston engines or ordinary multiple piston engines make large batteries obsolete where air is always available.
Two large compressed air energy storage systems are in operation and one UPS company uses ordinary compressed oxygen type tanks for compressed air energy storage. Carbon fiber or other materials can make such tanks much lighter so that they approach the weight energy density of batteries. In theory, large diameter pressure tanks have no weight advantage over multiple small diameter tanks, the size of tank that can be mass produced in large number would be the cheapest. If a heavy steel tank can store compresssed gas at a lower cost, then it is more suitable than a carbon fiber tank for a stationary installation. Air heaters, even fuel powered ones, increase the power available to the simple air turbines.
To store electricity in a battery increases its cost by a factor of more than three and may not even be practical for wind or solar energy. Most wind and solar projects rely upon grid connections and other interconnected generators for continuous power not batteries. Even HONDA sells inteconnected multiple electronic engine generator systems for portable power. ..HG..