« Valence Names China-Based Chief Technical Officer | Main | Pelamis Wave Power Completes £5M Financing Round »
In-Situ Carbonation of Peridotite Offers Large Scale Capacity for Permanent Storage of CO2
7 November 2008
Researchers at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory have concluded that the in situ carbonation of peridotite, a type of rock found at or near the surface in Oman and other areas around the world, could consume more than 1 billion tons of CO2 per year in Oman alone, affording a low-cost, safe, and permanent method to capture and store atmospheric CO2.
Their studies show that the rock reacts naturally at surprisingly high rates with CO2 to form solid minerals, and that the process could be speeded by multiple orders of magnitude with simple drilling and injection methods. The study appears in this week’s early edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Peridotite comprises most or all of the rock in the mantle, which undergirds earth’s crust. It starts some 20 kilometers or more down, but occasionally pieces are exhumed when tectonic plates collide and push the mantle rock to the surface, as in Oman.
Geologists already knew that once exposed to air, the rock can react quickly with CO2, forming a solid carbonate like limestone or marble. However, schemes to transport it to power plants, grind it and combine it with smokestack gases have been seen as too costly and energy intensive. The researchers say that the discovery of previously unknown high rates of reaction underground means CO2 could be sent there artificially, at far less expense.
Geologist Peter Kelemen and geochemist Jürg Matter made the discovery during field work in the Omani desert, where they have worked for years. Their study area, a Massachusetts-size expanse of largely bare, exposed peridotite, is crisscrossed on the surface with terraces, veins and other formations of whitish carbonate minerals, formed rapidly in recent times when minerals in the rock reacted with CO2-laden air or water.
Up to 10 times more carbonates lie in veins below ground. The subterranean veins were previously thought to be formed by processes unconnected to the atmosphere, and to be nearly as old as the 96-million-year-old rock itself. However, using conventional carbon isotope dating, Kelemen and Matter showed that the underground veins are also quite young&mdsah;26,000 years on average—and are still actively forming as CO2-rich groundwater percolates downward. Many underground samples were conveniently exposed in newly constructed road cuts.
All told, Kelemen and Matter estimate that the Omani peridotite is naturally absorbing 10,000 to 100,000 tons of carbon a year—far more than anyone had thought. Similarly large exposures of peridotite are known on the Pacific islands of Papua New Guinea and Caledonia, and along the coasts of Greece and the former Yugoslavia; smaller deposits occur in the western United States and many other places.
The scientists say that the process of locking up carbon in the rocks could be speeded 100,000 times or more simply by boring down and injecting heated water containing pressurized CO2. Once jump-started in this way, the reaction would naturally generate heat. That heat would in turn hasten the reaction, fracturing large volumes of rock, exposing it to reaction with still more CO2-rich solution. Heat generated by the earth itself also would help. (The exposed Omani peridotite extends down some 5 kilometers.)
The scientists say that such a chain reaction would need little energy input after it was started. Accounting for engineering challenges and other imperfections, they assert that Oman alone could probably absorb some 4 billion tons of atmospheric carbon a year—a substantial part of the 30 billion sent into the atmosphere by humans, mainly through burning of fuels. With large amounts of new solids forming underground, cracking and expansion would generate micro-earthquakes—but not enough to be readily perceptible to humans, says Kelemen.
We see this as just one of a whole suite of methods to trap carbon. It’s a big mistake to think that we should be searching for one thing that will take care of it all.>
—Peter Keleman
Matter has been working on a separate project in Iceland, where volcanic basalt also shows promise for absorbing CO2 produced by power plants. Trials there are set to begin in spring 2009, in partnership with Reykjavik Energy, and the universities of Iceland and Toulouse (France).
Resources
Peter B. Kelemen and Jürg Matter (2008) In situ carbonation of peridotite for CO2 storage. PNAS doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805794105
November 7, 2008 in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) | Permalink | Comments (9) | TrackBack (0)
Comments
Posted by: Kristoff | November 07, 2008 at 03:54 AM
This method may be used to capture CO2 out of the air also. If the water sprayed in an energy tower (see wikipedia) could be 'enriched' with a slury of peridotite, it could at the same time produce a lot of energy (much more than needed for drilling and grinding the peridotite) and capture the CO2 in the air that's drawn in. Oman has the ideal climate for the tower, and enough seawater available.
So, in addition to producing electricity, they could sell the carbon credits to the aviation industry. Excess energy could be used to produce hydrogen for their oil refineries.
Posted by: Alain | November 07, 2008 at 04:48 AM
".....the reaction would naturally generate heat."
Is this something we need to worry about in our so called "global warming" climate??????
Just curious.
Posted by: Mark A | November 07, 2008 at 09:34 AM
eesh. First the silliness of human CO2 continues on and on then some yahoo decides that we should store it in the Middle East! I can see it now -- "Break our CO2 storage addiction to Oman and drill at home!"
Stupid is as stupid does.
Posted by: jv | November 07, 2008 at 10:04 AM
So the Arabs have us by both gonads?
Posted by: DS | November 07, 2008 at 12:19 PM
CO2 storing in any form is a ridiculous idea, because with the carbon you storing away oxygen.
There is already evidence of oxygen depletion , if it fall below 18% we are out
Posted by: mki | November 07, 2008 at 05:23 PM
Storing O2 is bad? No! Reacting it is bad, but not so much!
Lets say from burning a lot of coal, oil, gas, wood, etc you create 1000PPM of CO2. That would deplete is 0.1% Oxygen from the ~ 21%. Seems like nowhere near getting us to 18%. On the plus side forest fires should be slightly less frequent. Ancient earth once had higher % O2 and a much more volatile forest fire season.
Posted by: | November 07, 2008 at 06:19 PM
"The scientists say that the process of locking up carbon in the rocks could be speeded 100,000 times or more simply by boring down and injecting heated water containing pressurized CO2. Once jump-started in this way, the reaction would naturally generate heat. That heat would in turn hasten the reaction, fracturing large volumes of rock, exposing it to reaction with still more CO2-rich solution."
Just curious, does this entail any risk of inducing earthquakes? A chain reaction underground sounds a bit scary.
Posted by: John L. | November 08, 2008 at 09:28 PM
Is this something we need to worry about in our so called "global warming" climate??????
No. The heat generated would be small compared to the heat produced when the fossil fuels were burned, which in turn is very small compared to the solar heat trapped by the released atmospheric CO2. Remember, the amount of sunlight striking the Earth is around 100,000,000 gigawatts, so even slight changes that make reradiation of this energy more difficult are equivalent to a very large extra thermal load.
Posted by: Paul F. Dietz | November 09, 2008 at 04:46 AM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef010535d8e64d970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference In-Situ Carbonation of Peridotite Offers Large Scale Capacity for Permanent Storage of CO2 :

Twitter headlines



"Oman alone could probably absorb some 4 billion tons of atmospheric carbon a year—a substantial part of the 30 billion sent into the atmosphere by humans, mainly through burning of fuels."
"Similarly large exposures of peridotite are known on the Pacific islands of Papua New Guinea and Caledonia, and along the coasts of Greece and the former Yugoslavia; smaller deposits occur in the western United States and many other places."
"We see this as just one of a whole suite of methods to trap carbon. It’s a big mistake to think that we should be searching for one thing that will take care of it all."
"The researchers say that the discovery of previously unknown high rates of reaction underground means CO2 could be sent there artificially, at far less expense."
Oman, Papua New Guinea and Caledonia sound pretty remote. In Greece, former Yugoslavia & western USA one can imagine sending the CO2 underground from thermal power stations built in the area; for Oman PNG & Caledonia, how could CO2 be 'sent there artificially' at low cost?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peridotite :
"Oceanic plates consist of up to about 100 km of peridotite covered by a thin crust; the crust, commonly about 6 km thick, consists of basalt, gabbro, and minor sediments."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_dry_rock_geothermal_energy
Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) CO2:
"Research conducted at Los Alamos National Laboratories and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories examined the use of supercritical CO2, instead of water, as the geothermal working fluid with favorable results."
Maybe test results from injecting CO2 into shallow peridotite in Greece or western USA could provide information which could help develop CCS in Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS).