« National Oil Companies Gaining Predominance | Main | Ford Asks Congress for $9B Stand-By Line of Credit; Commercial BEV by 2010, BEV Sedan by 2011 »
European Parliament and Council Reach Agreement on Automotive CO2 Regulations
2 December 2008
Following a series of meetings between Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) and the French Presidency of the Council, the two sides have informally agreed upon the details of future targets on CO2 emissions from cars. The compromise identifies a longer-term reduction target; allows phased-in implementation of the shorter-term target; and reduces proposed penalties against carmakers that exceed the limits.
The informal compromise is based on the Commission’s proposed target of an average of 120g of CO2/km for new passenger cars (M1 category) by 2012, compared to the current levels of 160 g/km. A target of 130g/km is to be reached by improvements in vehicle motor technology; the subsequent 10g/km reduction is to come from other technological improvements and by an increased use of sustainable biofuels. Key elements of the compromise include:
Long-term target: the compromise introduces a long-term target for 2020 for the new car fleet of average emissions of 95 g CO2/km;
Phase-in: the compromise says that manufacturers will be given interim targets of ensuring that average CO2 emissions of 65% of their fleets in January 2012, 75% in January 2013, 80% in January 2014 and 100% from 2015, comply with the car manufacturer’s specific CO2 emissions target. The original proposal required 100% implementation in 2012.
Excess emissions premiums: the compromise provides that manufacturers exceeding the carbon dioxide targets set by the regulation will have to pay the following fines (so called excess emissions premiums):
From 2012 until 2018:
- €5 Euro for the first gram of CO2
- €15 Euro for the second gram of CO2
- €25 Euro for the third gram of CO2
- €95 Euro from the fourth gram of CO2 onwards.
From 2019 manufacturers will have to pay €95 euro for each gram exceeding the target. The Commission had proposed starting fines at €20 per gram over the limit in 2012, rising to €35 in 2013, €60 in 2014 and €95 in 2015.
Mass-based targets: the CO2 targets for passenger cars is to be defined as a function of the utility of the cars on a linear basis. Mass is the initial parameter selected. Data on alternative utility parameters such as footprint (track width times wheelbase) is to be collected in order to facilitate longer-term evaluations of the utility-based approach. The Commission should by 2014 review the availability of data and, if appropriate, submit a proposal on adapting the utility parameter.
The original proposal noted that in establishing targets, the projected evolution of new cars’ mass until 2012 should be taken into account, and potential incentives to increase vehicle mass just in order to benefit from a consequential increase of the CO2 reduction target should be avoided.
Emissions from passenger cars account for 12% of overall EU emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), according to European Commission’s figures. The new regulation is part of the EU’s effort to reduce CO2 emissions by 20% by 2020.
The compromise reached on Monday evening still needs to be endorsed by the full Council and put to a first reading vote at Parliament’s December plenary session in Strasbourg.
Resources
December 2, 2008 in Climate Change, Emissions, Europe, Policy | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)
Comments
Posted by: mahonj | December 02, 2008 at 10:36 AM
If I were from an area that was depositing more of something in the environment than I was removing I might feel a responisbility to remove some too. (Even if what they are depositing is harmless and necessary to green the planet).
But thankfully here in North America we have ALREADYy made all the tough decisions and chosices to sequester more of that stuff than we emit. So our job is done. We ought to just step back and wait patiently for "les autres" to get their act together, and catch up.
Factoid: North America sequesters 1.7 petagrams of carbon into the atmosphere, from all sources per annum. NA emits 1.3 petagrams of carbon from all sources into the atmosphere per annum. North Americans have completed their job. Bow and accept Applause.
Source: Refered paper in "Science" Journal of AAAS. 2000
Never heard of it? Maybe you have been listening to too much propaganda...
Posted by: stas peterson | December 02, 2008 at 06:19 PM
2012 target can be reached by just hybridizing or make more diesel cars and 2020 targets can be reached with HCCI with ethanol from 3rd generation biofuel tech such as algae. So most manufacturer wouldn't really have problem with those except Porsche, Ferrari and Lamborghini...oh did I mention Pagani?
Posted by: zard | December 02, 2008 at 10:41 PM
A joke. Back to the stoneage goes England and EU chasing their addiction to the drug CO2. What buffoonery it appears - to neglect the rise in NOx emissions - a toxin and danger to human health - in favor of carbon dioxide - a harmless trace gas fertilizing plant life worldwide.
Good luck.
Posted by: reel$$ | December 03, 2008 at 10:42 AM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef010536296417970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference European Parliament and Council Reach Agreement on Automotive CO2 Regulations:

Twitter headlines
It looks like most of the manufacturers will get to 130 by 2012, the specialists will just have to pay the fines, which will be roughly e950 / 10 gms over.
Which is quite a bit - it will force the likes of Range Rover to get their act together as fast as possible.
The 95gms by 2020 sounds like a trickier target, as all the easy things will have been done by 2012.
I suppose it will mean partial electrification - PHEvs in some shape or from would seem to be the current best plan.
It will be interesting to see what it does to the European car export industry - if the price of fuel stays low, they will have to produce 2 versions of anything they want to export*, if the price of fuel goes up, they will have a huge advantage from a 15 year lead in very low CO2 technology.
*Assuming the very low CO2 requirements increase the cost quite a bit.