« Waste Management and InEnTec Create Joint Venture to Develop and Operate Plasma Gasification Facilities for Synthetic Fuels and Power | Main | EPA Administrator Reinstates Role of Staff Paper in Reviewing National Ambient Air Quality Standards »
Cummins Progressing In Development of More Efficient Light-Duty Diesel Engines; Targeting 10.5% Fuel Economy Improvement Over 2007 Baseline With Tier 2 Bin 5 Emissions
21 May 2009
| Cummins’ Light Duty Efficient Combustion technology is designed to scale down across smaller light-duty engines. Source: Cummins. Click to enlarge. |
Cummins is progressing in the development of Light Duty Efficient Clean Combustion (LDECC) technology for light-duty diesel engines. The objective of the DOE co-funded R&D program, which began in October 2007 and runs through November 2010, is to develop and design an advanced diesel combustion system that meets Tier 2 Bin 5 standards while delivering improvements in fuel efficiency. Project partners include Chrysler and BP.
Cummins is developing LDECC on a V8, and is targeted at improving the fuel efficiency of a 5,000 lb test weight LDV over the FTP city drive cycle by 10.5%. Cummins is designing LDECC with the intention of scaling it down across its family of smaller I-4 light duty engines, with displacements down to 2.8L.
In a presentation at the Department of Energy (DOE) Merit Review this week in Washington, D.C., Don Stanton, Corporate Director, Advanced Engine R&D at Cummins, said that company started out by focusing on expanding early PCCI (Premixed Charge Compression Ignition) and smokeless rich combustion to provide for a simultaneous reduction in NOx and PM while maintaining improvements in fuel economy.
| Lifted flame combustion at high loads. Click to enlarge. |
Cummins is now transitioning to lifted flame combustion with air entrainment at intermediate loads to avoid the high noise and cylinder pressures of early PCCI while still maintaining the improvements in fuel economy. The lifted flame combustion at high load improves NOx vs. PM, has a higher EGR tolerance, and provides a more favorable combustion centroid. Implementing lifted flame combustion in this application entails work with the nozzle tip geometry and injection pressure, and controlling the charge temperature, Stanton said.
Cummins is investigating four distinct areas of enabling technologies to drive fuel economy improvements:
Fuel injection systems. Cummins is looking at two systems, one piezo, one solenoid. In this phase of the development, the engineers are working with an injection pressure of more than 2,200 bar, with up to 7 injection events.
Air handling systems. Cummins is going after a high capacity combined low-pressure and high-pressure EGR system. There is currently an EGR cooler bypass on the high pressure loop. Cummins is also designing SOHC and DOHC variable valve actuation systems, implementing three different concepts; the Miller cycle is used for part of the regime. Other elements include variable swirl and a two-stage turbocharger.
Controls and sensing system. Cummins is implementing a closed loop combustion control system, which Stanton called the key to the entire LDECC effort. It uses in-cylinder sensors and piezo actuator feedback for fuel delivery and combustion phasing. Other elements in the control system include fuel quality sensing, charge management embedded models, and drive cycle optimization.
Aftertreatment. In addition to the particulate filter, Cummins has decided to explore the inclusion of an SCR system. Although the original goal of the project was to do away with NOx aftertreatment systems via lower engine-out NOx, Cummins is concerned about the potential impact of the SFTP2 supplemental test procedures being considered by the California Air Resources Board (ARB). Moreover, the need for high power densities in the light-duty engines makes it even more challenging to achieve the requisite levels of NOx reduction in cylinder, Stanton said.
| The technology currently can deliver up to 7.2% lower fuel consumption, but would require an SCR system for NOx control. Click to enlarge. |
With a basic implementation of an optimized combustion system design (including piston bowl, injector nozzle and intake swirl combination); fixed geometry, sequential turbomachinery; a high-pressure loop EGR system; and DOC and DPF aftertreatment, Cummins is close to achieving engine-out Tier 2 Bin 5 emissions, along with an improvement in fuel consumption of 3.1%.
Using the same set of enabling technology, but allowing more engine-out NOx—which would need to be addressed by the SCR aftertreatment system—Cummins currently shows a 7.2% improvement in fuel consumption compared to a 2007 baseline engine. There is additional room for system optimization on top of that, and the 10.5% target could be conservative.
Cummins has a number of milestones to hit this year, including:
- A Closed Loop Combustion Control Strategy that will adjust fuel injection parameters based on processing of the cylinder pressure signal to achieve optimal combustion phasing.
- Engine testing with the first prototype VVA system, exploring Miller cycle, trapped residual, and aftertreatment thermal management.
- Analysis and single cylinder engine testing to determine the benefits of a combustion recipe with lower compression ratio. The goal is to determine if a lower compression ratio piston can help extend the early PCCI operating range without efficiency degradation.
- Selecting an engineer architecture for the upcoming third funding phase (budget period 3, BP3).
- Development of a VVA controls strategy. Integration of the VVA system controls will be done in two steps. First, the VVA controller will be incorporated into the engine air handling controls framework. Second, closed loop combustion control feedback will be added to the controls strategy.
May 21, 2009 in Diesel, Emissions, Engines | Permalink | Comments (8) | TrackBack (0)
Comments
Posted by: Will S | May 21, 2009 at 12:09 PM
Um...10.5%. They better be thinking 100% improvement or they will have no future. A 2009 Dodge PU with the 8 cyl Cummings gets 18 mpg's, it will need to get 30 Mpg's come 2016.
Posted by: JosephT | May 21, 2009 at 12:15 PM
Joe T, there is no 8 cylinder Cummings. The company name is Cummins. The 8 Cylinder in the '09 Ram is a gasoline 5.7L Hemi or a 4.7 flex fuel V8. There is a 6.7L straight 6 diesel in the 3/4 ton and up pickups. They get much closer over 24 mpg highway, stock. I believe that 10.5% improvement was a 10.5% improvement over another diesel engine. The 5.0L V8 in development should deliver a 50% improvement over the gasoline engine, so 19.5 city, and 25 highway. http://www.dieselpowermag.com/tech/dodge/0612dp_new_cummins_v6_and_v8/photo_10.html
So, just from that, they need to eek out another 5 mpg's and they have 7 years. Reasonable.
Posted by: RyanD1981 | May 21, 2009 at 12:52 PM
Ryan,
Isn't the cafe standard based on the epa average? It seems your assertion "they need to eek out another 5 mpg's" is based on the highway mpg.
And how about diesel vs gasoline? Isn't the 30 mpg for gasoline? Diesel emits around 12% more CO2 per litre, so wouldn't the diesel have to get 34 mpg? To me it seems the gap is more than 10 mpg, not 5.
Posted by: Anne | May 21, 2009 at 02:34 PM
I thought 30 mpg is was a fuel economy thing only. 34 mpg out of a full size truck would be pretty incredible. Even if it is based on the EPA average, CAFE is based on total sales. So we have not considered smaller sport and midsized pickups, SUVs, and other vehicles classified as as a "truck". The smaller trucks tend to get better fuel economy due to lower power demand, smaller engines, lighter weight, etc. So the full sized pickups should be close, but the target can be made with sales of the smaller trucks to average it out.
This article just talks about how the engine improved economy. 5 to 10 mpg can be had with a well geared transmission.
There's a guy on the dieseltruckresource.com that modified a '93 Jeep Wrangler with a Cummins 3.3L diesel. He's getting 35+ mpg. These little engines should do just as well.
Posted by: RyanD1981 | May 21, 2009 at 05:01 PM
The quoted 10.5 % improvement is over a the diesel 2007 baseline. That baseline is defined at reported here:
http://www.dieselpowermag.com/tech/dodge/0612dp_new_cummins_v6_and_v8/index.html
The base line 2007 Cummins new v8 5.0 liter diesel was 22.7 combined mpg in a full size RAM. So the target is 10.5% better than that or 25.08 mpg. I assume that was in a 4 speed Ram; and newer transmissions like their 7 speed Dual Clutch designed, with the factory built, but not in production. The usual 7% greater mileage of 7 speeds over 4 speeds, would increase the mileage to 26.83 mpg, almost 1 more mile per gallon than needed to meet 2016 CAFE rules dictated by the Clueless One.
Posted by: ExDemo | May 22, 2009 at 06:29 PM
In the longer term, it does not realy mean much. Most ICE will be downsized to 1000 cc gensets for extended range PHEVs withing 5 to 7 years.
The lightest, cleanest ICE may survive. in a supporting role, for another 10 to 20 years. Heavies (gas guzzlers) will go to museums.
Posted by: HarveyD | May 23, 2009 at 04:49 PM
It really doesn't work to compare window sticker or real-world fuel economy to the CAFE standard. The CAFE standard is relative to the original test procedures with no adjustments to make the test procedures more like the real world- the test procedure results are wildly optimistic, basically the best-case scenario. There have been multiple significant adjustments over decades that make the results from this test more realistic, but for the purposes of the CAFE standard they use the unadjusted results.
That's why when you see a manufacturer's current CAFE average you will wonder how they achieve that number with their current products. About the only useful comparison is to compare that number to the new CAFE standard, and use the difference between the two as your benchmark for how many more MPG each (typical) vehicle needs. It does NOT mean that the vehicle window stickers are going to have numbers that even approach the CAFE numbers.
Posted by: Wes | May 25, 2009 at 08:07 AM
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef0115709ccf5b970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Cummins Progressing In Development of More Efficient Light-Duty Diesel Engines; Targeting 10.5% Fuel Economy Improvement Over 2007 Baseline With Tier 2 Bin 5 Emissions:

Twitter headlines
Ok, so Cummins is sticking with the truck market.