Green Car Congress  
Go to GCC Discussions forum About GCC Contact  RSS Subscribe Twitter headlines

« LS9 Closes $25M Round; Chevron Takes a Stake | Main | GM Establishes China Science Lab »

Print this post

Auto Industry Weighs in Against Murkowski Amendment that Delays EPA Regulation of Stationary Source CO2 Emissions

24 September 2009

The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers (AAM) and the Association of International Automobile Manufacturers (AIAM) have sent a joint letter to US Senator Diane Feinstein, opposing an amendment to an appropriations act that would prohibit the Environmental Protection Agency from spending money on regulating carbon dioxide from stationary sources under the Clean Air Act for a period of one year.

Senator Feinstein is the chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee’s Subcommittee on Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies. Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski proposed Amendment Number 2530 to H.R. 2996, the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act.

Murkowski, the ranking Republican on the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, said her amendment is necessary to avoid the “economic train wreck” that would result from the Environmental Protection Agency regulating stationary sources of carbon dioxide under the Clean Air Act. The AAM and AIAM are opposing this amendment.

As manufacturers, we are sympathetic to the thrust of Senator Murkowski’s amendment that the Congress—and not simply EPA acting under the provisions of the current Clean Air Act—should determine how best to reduce US greenhouse gas emissions economy-wide.

However, the amendment raises additional issues that must be considered where complicated and interconnected environmental and legal issues are at stake. We are concerned that due to the complex interactions among regulations under the various sections of the Clean Air Act, the amendment may impact significantly pending regulations in the mobile source sector—despite language in the amendment that would appear to leave the sector unaffected. In a letter to Senator Feinstein dated September 23, Administrator Jackson stated EPA’s interpretation that the Murkowski amendment as filed would “make it impossible for the Environmental Protection Agency to promulgate the light-duty vehicle greenhouse-gas emissions standards that the agency proposed on September 15, 2009.”

While the author of the amendment appears not to intend this outcome, we feel compelled to express our concerns. It is critical that the national program for regulating greenhouse gas emissions from autos be finalized early next year. Failure to do so would subject automakers to a patchwork of conflicting state and federal regulations.

—AAM President and CEO Dave McCurdy and AIAM President and CEO Michael Stanton

September 24, 2009 in Brief | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef0120a59617fe970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Auto Industry Weighs in Against Murkowski Amendment that Delays EPA Regulation of Stationary Source CO2 Emissions :

Comments

There are far more important things to do right now than to increase regulations. Regulations cannot be imposed merely because of someones opinion that something is dangerous. The most dangerous features of a society must be eliminated first as they are economical to do so. Life is not risk free. It is quite clear from statistics that the operation of motorcycles cause more deaths and injuries per mile than does the operation of automobiles. In light of the many seatbelt laws promoted over the US and the absence of similar protection for operators of motorcycles, it is not logical or economic to allow motorcycles to be operated in the US.

It is of course obvious that the smoking of tobacco products must be eliminated before any substantial further modifications of the clean air rgulations. ..HG..

I applaud the AAM and AIAM for speaking out as they did. It's clear we are long overdue on reining in fuel economy and GHG emissions; I would have made them much more stringent, frankly.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Green Car Congress © 2013 BioAge Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Home | BioAge Group