Port of Los Angeles to Evaluate Vision Industries’ Tyrano Fuel Cell Hybrid Class 8 Trucks
Researchers Suggest That Integrating CO2 Reforming of Methane into GTL Process Can Significantly Reduce GHG Emissions and Natural Gas Feedstock Requirements

Study Finds Ocean Acidification May Reduce Iron Available to Marine Phytoplankton

Ongoing ocean acidification due to increasing atmospheric CO2 may reduce the bioavailability of dissolved iron (Fe), which is a limiting nutrient in large oceanic regions, according to a study by researchers at Princeton University. A paper on their work was published online 14 January in the journal Science.

Unrelated to global warming, the dissolution of additional atmospheric CO2 in the ocean is leading to predictable changes in the chemistry of the water, including an increase in pCO2, a decrease in pH, and a decrease in the carbonate ion concentration, [CO3 2-]. While the effects of increasing pCO2 and decreasing [CO3 2-] on phytoplankton have received some attention, the authors note, the potential effects of the decrease in pH, nearly 0.3 pH units for a doubling of pCO2, has not.

Iron is the biologically important element whose chemistry is most sensitive to pH. The bulk of Fe(III) in the ocean is known to be chelated by organic compounds, and the fraction that is not chelated is present as hydrolyzed species, Fe(OH)x(3-x)+, with the neutral tri-hydroxy species, Fe(OH)3, being very insoluble. As ocean waters acidify, decreasing the hydroxide ion concentration, iron’s speciation and solubility will be altered.

—Shi et al.

The study by Shi et al. showed that the bioavailability of dissolved Fe may decline due to ocean acidification. Acidification of media containing various Fe compounds decreases the Fe uptake rate of diatoms and coccolithophores to an extent predicted by the changes in Fe chemistry. A slower Fe uptake by a model diatom with decreasing pH was also seen in experiments with Atlantic surface water.

In areas where particulate Fe inputs are important, this effect may be partially compensated by the increased effectiveness of some chelators in dissolving Fe from oxyhydroxides and/or by enhancing the photo-induced redox cycle of Fe. We have found so far no evidence that an increase in pCO2 above present day values results in a lower Fe requirement. It thus seems likely that, unless Fe inputs to surface seawater increase as a result of global change, the net result of seawater acidification should be an increase in the Fe-stress of the phytoplankton in many areas of the oceans.

—Shi et al.

Resources

  • Dalin Shi, Yan Xu, Brian M. Hopkinson, François M. M. Morel (2010) Effect of Ocean Acidification on Iron Availability to Marine Phytoplankton. Science Express. doi: 10.1126/science.1183517

Comments

GdB

Can you say jellyfish sushi? Yuck!

Sean Prophet

Come on, Goracle, nothing to say about how ocean chemistry is an Al Gore $cam?? I'm really disappointed!

Engineer-Poet

<snort!>

sulleny

The AGWs have so imploded the tiny credibility they once had - reason to comment vanishes.

http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/12/pachauri-scandal.php

ai_vin

Thank you for that link; which, BTW, had this to say at the end: "There shouldn't be much doubt that global warming skeptics and deniers will latch onto the Pachauri story like they did with the hacked emails from IPCC scientists. The problem for the deniers is that both stories don't contradict the scientific fact of anthropogenic climate change."

ai_vin

Oh ho, it gets better. :^) This "scandal" was brought to light by the Telegraph's Christopher Booker and Richard North. Booker and North are notorious climate change deniers and their arguments tend to have big holes. Booker is also infamous for denying the dangers of asbestos and second hand smoke.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Booker

"denying the dangers of asbestos and second hand smoke?" ;^)

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)