Green Car Congress  
About GCC Contact  RSS Subscribe Twitter headlines
Tweets From the Editor
(different than @GreenCarCongres headlines)

« Improving Life Cycle Assessment of US Grid Electricity | Main | Southern California Governments Rejects Federal Ethanol Funding »

Print this post

Mitsubishi Heavy Signs MOU with PBMR Pty on Development of Small-size Nuclear Power Generation Plant

7 February 2010

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (MHI) has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (Pty) Ltd (PBMR Pty) of the Republic of South Africa to study the area of collaboration in the development of the helium-cooled, High Temperature Reactor (HTR) Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR).

Based on the MOU, MHI will initially study the area for possible collaboration in the design of 200 MWt (megawatts thermal) plant, which PBMR Pty is currently developing. Going forward, the two companies will also probe further collaboration, including construction of plants and market exploration. With the newly concluded MOU, PBMR development will now move forward toward commercialization of a small size reactor.

MHI did the basic design and research and development of a helium-driven turbo generator system and Core Barrel Assembly, the major components of PBMR’s original 400 MW thermal, direct-cycle design. This concept was changed last year to a 200 MWt design which delivers super-heated steam through a steam generator.

The 200 MWt plant consists of a 200 MWt PBMR and a steam generator that provides hot steam at 750 °C (1,382 °F). The plant uses silicon carbide-coated uranium particles encased in graphite for the fuel spheres and helium as the coolant, making it free from risk of reactor core meltdown. The PBMR requires relatively low initial investment and is considered to be well suited to applications in areas lacking a fully developed power transmission grid.

The 200 MWt design is aimed at steam process heat applications, which provides the basis for penetrating the nuclear heat market as a viable alternative for carbon-burning, high-emission heat sources. In addition to generating electricity, this concept can also service potential customers such as the Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP) project in the US, which is funded by the US Department of Energy, oil sands producers in Canada and the South African petro-chemical industry. A number of potential customers, including South Africa’s Sasol, have been studying the introduction of the plant, which is targeted to begin operation in approximately year 2020.

Specifically, when collaboration area has been agreed, MHI will conduct part of the research & development activities for the 200 MWt plant design. In the future, further collaboration possibilities will be probed, including construction of the 200 MWt plant and exploring market potential for the PBMR.

PBMR. The PBMR reactor has a vertical steel pressure vessel which contains and supports a metallic core barrel, which in turn supports the cylindrical pebble fuel core. This cylindrical fuel core is surrounded on the side by an outer graphite reflector and on top and bottom by graphite structures which provide similar upper and lower neutron reflection functions. Vertical borings in the side reflector are provided for the reactivity control elements. Two diverse reactivity control systems are provided for shutting the reactor down.

The PBMR uses particles of enriched uranium dioxide coated with silicon carbide and pyrolytic carbon. The particles are encased in graphite to form a fuel sphere or pebble about the size of a billiard ball. The core of the reactor contains approximately 360,000 of these fuel spheres.

Helium, which is used as the coolant, transfers the energy absorbed in the core to a secondary loop through a special heat exchanger. The helium in the primary circuit is circulated by a blower. The secondary side of the steam generator contains water. The heat absorbed changes the water to steam which, in turn, is used to drive a steam turbine connected to a generator to produce electricity in the same way conventional power stations operate. In this configuration, the reactor is an electricity producing plant.

The secondary side of the steam generator may also be directly coupled to a process plant to provide the energy as process heat. In this configuration, the reactor is a pure process heat producing plant. Another possibility is to configure the PBMR into a co-generation plant, i.e. one that produces both electricity and process heat.

Resources

February 7, 2010 in Brief | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef012877704970970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mitsubishi Heavy Signs MOU with PBMR Pty on Development of Small-size Nuclear Power Generation Plant :

Comments

This article and the companies involved should clearly mention the possibility of producing cheap hydrogen by using heat in a chemical or even electrochemical process. This hydrogen can be combined with CO2 to make methanol, gasoline or diesel. The temperature can be high enough for the direct heat activated production of hydrogen. This reactor type has been demonstrated in China and before that in Germany to have no possibility of reactor explosion due to reactor runaway. ..HG..

There should be a requirement that all federally subsidized and allowed ethanol producing factories be relocated next to a nuclear power plants and use steam diverted from the reactors for processing. The fuel uranium cost for such heat is very small. Almost none of the price of nuclear electricity at the customers meter is for the uranium used. The uranium actually needed for all the electricity produced in the US over a hundred years, divided by the number of persons in the US is only a pound or two each and would fit in the bottom of a soft drink can. ..HG..

HG:

Good points.

How would people accept 1000+ similar plants distributed in the country side across the country?

If located where cellulosic ethanol and/or bio fuel feedstocks are, i.e in farms and forests, it may be easier to sell.

Useful wastes from cities could be transported to the closest country side plants to be converted into useable energy.

The problem with the nuclear reactors we now have is, unless we go to breeder reactors and fuel reprocessing, we're only using 1% of the energy potential of our uranium resources. Unfortunately we Americans are hung up about fuel reprocessing and also, Senator Harry Reid of Nevada won't allow the Yucca Mountain waste storage facility to go into operation. Therefore I suggest sending used nuclear fuel to China and paying them to store non-reusable fission products. Said payment should be adjusted to account for their utilization of plutonium which occurs as a by-product.

That way, we won't be wasting the energy potential of plutonium like we're presently doing.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Green Car Congress © 2012 BioAge Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Home | BioAge Group