« California ARB hearing on Advanced Clean Cars regulation package carries over to Friday | Main | Ford uses kenaf plant inside doors in the new Escape, saving weight and energy »
Berkeley Lab developing novel metal-organic framework materials for high-capacity hydrogen storage
27 January 2012
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) is working to synthesize novel metal-organic framework materials with high hydrogen adsorption capacities sufficient to provide safe and cost-effective storage that could support a 300-mile (483-km) range on vehicles.
The US Department of Energy recently awarded Berkeley Lab a three-year, $2.1 million grant for the project, which will also include contributions by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and General Motors (GM). (Earlier post.) The grant was part of more than $7 million awarded by DOE last month for hydrogen storage technologies in fuel cell electric vehicles.
With these materials, we’re working on storing the hydrogen without the use of very high pressures, which will be safer and also more efficient without the significant compression energy losses.
—Jeffrey Long, project co-leader
Separately, Long is also using MOFs in a carbon capture project, in which the material would selectively absorb carbon dioxide over nitrogen. For the fuel cell project, the trick lies not in getting the MOF to select hydrogen out of a mixture but to store as much hydrogen as possible.
Long’s approach is to create frameworks with lightweight metal sites on the surface, making it attractive for hydrogen molecules to bind to the sites. So far Long has succeeded in more than doubling hydrogen capacity, but only at very low temperatures (around 77 Kelvin, or -321 °F).
It’s still very much basic research on how to create revolutionary new materials that would boost the capacity by a factor of four or five at room temperature. We have an idea of what kinds of frameworks we might make to do this.
Our approach has been to make some of the first metal-organic frameworks that have exposed metal cations on the surface. Now we need to figure out ways of synthesizing the materials so that instead of one hydrogen molecule we can get two or three or even four hydrogen molecules per metal site. Nobody’s done that.
—Jeffrey Long
Martin Head-Gordon, a Berkeley Lab computational chemist an co-leader, will work on theoretical understanding of MOFs so that he can try to predict their hydrogen storage properties and then instruct Long’s team as to what kind of material to synthesize.
The scientist at GM will aid in providing accurate high-pressure measurements. The NIST scientist is an expert in neutron diffraction and neutron spectroscopy, which will allow Long and his team to pinpoint where exactly the hydrogen is going and verify that it is binding to the metals.
January 27, 2012 in Hydrogen Storage | Permalink | Comments (9) | TrackBack (0)
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef0168e6264e3e970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Berkeley Lab developing novel metal-organic framework materials for high-capacity hydrogen storage:
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Twitter headlines

This is 1/3 of the solution to take FC powered vehicles to the market place. The other 2 x 1/3 (lower cost FCs and hydrogen distribution infrastructure) have to be addressed. Will that be done before extended range lower cost BEVs arrive?
Posted by: HarveyD | January 27, 2012 at 09:19 AM
It depends on how you look at it. I would say it's 1/3 of the problem, because they present no evidence that they have a solution.
Posted by: Brotherkenny4 | January 27, 2012 at 11:05 AM
Bk4....I assumed that this first 1/3 of the problem is already solved.
Posted by: HarveyD | January 27, 2012 at 12:30 PM
When you look at the Honda Clarity FCV with home refueling, it has more than 200 mile range without a lot of batteries. However, if battery prices continue to come down and FC prices stay high, it is anyone's guess what will happen.
Posted by: SJC | January 27, 2012 at 02:14 PM
A decent low cost 15 year 35kWh battery pack and a small range extender running on a renewable liquid fuel and we are set until the Sun goes belly up. No need for hydrogen except for airplanes, helicopters and rockets.
Posted by: Herm | January 28, 2012 at 10:42 AM
Why does the DOE keep spending money to continue to prove that H2 is not a feasible fuel for autos? It is well-known the costs from well to wheel is amazingly costly, too costly to be practical.
Spend the money on getting better batteries to market and move the research in that direction.
Posted by: Lad | January 28, 2012 at 11:33 AM
Do they have the fuel cell stack they want to roll out thier first fuel cell cars? Yes.
Do they have a fuel tank... yes
Do they have a car? Yes.
Do they have enough fuel in enough places for a rollout... yes.
Do they have enough people wanting the cars/trucks... yes.
Its just a matter of waiting for the systems they built to ramp up for that 2015 deadline and we will see how well they hit the mark.
Just like with battery cars we will see some dreadful misses and some realy good hits. I figure by 2020 everything will have settled enough for us to know where fuel cell cars will head.
Posted by: wintermane2000 | January 28, 2012 at 11:35 AM
The DOE is setting attainable goals to advance the technology. Hydrogen fuel cells may have a place and if they do they could have lower pressure storage.
I favor reforming methanol and running high temperature PEMs on the hydrogen from that. Methanol is cheap and that method was proven by Daimler more than a decade ago.
Posted by: SJC | January 28, 2012 at 01:09 PM
Enouph studies... Start commercialisation.
Posted by: A D | February 01, 2012 at 02:01 PM