Study finds increased air pollution can worsen both drought and flooding
Report: Suzuki to build another engine plant in Indonesia, tripling its output

N.E. Chemcat Corporation licenses Brookhaven Lab electrocatalyst technology for fuel cells in electric vehicles

This high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) image shows a bright shell on a relatively darker nanoparticle, signifying the formation of a core/shell structure — a platinum monolayer shell on a palladium nanoparticle core. Click to enlarge.

Japan-based N.E. Chemcat Corporation, a leading catalyst and precious metal compound manufacturer, has licensed electrocatalysts developed by scientists at the US Department of Energy’s Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) that can reduce the use of costly platinum and increase the effectiveness of fuel cells for use in electric vehicles. In addition, the license includes innovative methods for making the catalysts and an apparatus design used in manufacturing them.

The electrocatalysts consist of a palladium or a palladium alloy nanoparticle core covered with a monolayer—one-atom thick—platinum shell. (Earlier post.) This palladium-platinum combination notably improves oxygen reduction at the cathode of a hydrogen/oxygen fuel cell.

N.E. Chemcat currently provides highly active carbon supported platinum catalysts and alloy catalysts for fuel cell cathode applications, and carbon supported Pt-Ru catalysts and Pt-Ru black catalysts for anode applications.

Platinum is the most efficient electrocatalyst for fuel cells, but platinum-based catalysts are expensive, unstable, and have low durability. The newly licensed electrocatalysts have high activity, stability, and durability, while containing only about one tenth the platinum of conventional catalysts used in fuel cells, reducing overall costs.

In a paper published late last year in the journal Angewandte Chemie, International Edition, the BNL researchers reported that the new monolayer electrocatalyst maintained high levels of reactivity during tests that mimic stop-and-go driving—a critical challenge for fuel cells.

With conventional platinum fuel-cell catalysts, the oxidation and reduction cycling—triggered by changes in voltage that occur during stop-and-go driving—damages the platinum. Over time, the platinum dissolves, causing irreversible damage to the fuel cell.

With the new catalyst, palladium from the core is more reactive than platinum in these oxidation and reduction reactions. Stability tests simulating fuel cell voltage cycling revealed that after 100,000 potential cycles, a significant amount of palladium had been oxidized, dissolved, and migrated away from the cathode. In the membrane between the cathode and anode, the dissolved palladium ions were reduced by hydrogen diffusing from the anode to form a “band,” or dots.

In contrast, platinum was almost unaffected, except for a small contraction of the platinum monolayer. Reactivity of the platinum monolayer/palladium core catalyst also remained extremely high. It was reduced by merely 37% after 100,000 cycles.

The US Department of Energy’s Office of Science and its Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy funded research that contributed to these licensed technologies. Additional funding came from the Toyota Motor Corporation. Besides Adzic, those who contributed to the research include Brookhaven chemists Jia Wang, Kotaro Sasaki, and Miomir Vukmirovic, and postdoctoral fellows Junliang Zhang and Yibo Mo.


  • Sasaki, K., Naohara, H., Cai, Y., Choi, Y. M., Liu, P., Vukmirovic, M. B., Wang, J. X. and Adzic, R. R. (2010), Core-Protected Platinum Monolayer Shell High-Stability Electrocatalysts for Fuel-Cell Cathodes. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 49: 8602–8607. doi: 10.1002/anie.201004287



This could become a win-win-win technology for future lower cost, improved performance, longer lasting FCs, specially for heavy-large long range vehicles.


I've always preferred the idea of the fuel cell as an RE on a plug in car.
That would avoid the problem of wear due to stop start.


Less platinum, lower cost membranes, operation above 100C and they could make this viable some day.


Some green car bloggers, one in perticular that blog in autobloggreen always say that a single fuelcell cost a million dollar. At least GCC website seam more serious and give the real news about hydrogen fuelcell.

Hydrogen fuelcells cost next to nothing, do not pollute, last a century and use hydrogen that can be made in a compact machine for almost free without costly pollution and this small compact machine can be installed at the point of sale or even it can be installed into the car or tractor-trailer truck. That's maybe one of the reason why these fuelcell cars and tractor-trailer trucks are not commercialized as of yet, it's because manufacturers are now guessing if they can include the hydrogen maker directly into the car instead of a bothersome hydrogen infrastructure.


A D - Please tell us about "this small compact machine".


Hydrogen fuelcells cost next to nothing...

A D that is just plain false. Please stop making statements that you can NOT support.


Lucas, It's a electrolyser that make hydrogen gas with water.


SJC, Fuelcell cost a lot now because they are made in low quantity but as soon as you make it in serie and in quantity then the price drop a lot because there compact with few parts and last a lot of time and almost nothing wear.


Grid to wheels FCs efficiency is as low as 25% while grid to wheels EVs efficiency is as high as 86%. From an efficiency point of view, FCs can match new ICEVs but have a very long way to go to match EVs.


A D that is like saying if we use more platinum, it will cost less. Show me the proof that a 100 kW fuel cell will cost 1/10th as much if you build 10,000 of them a year. You can not because it is not true.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)