« ABB wins $30M order for world’s highest voltage three-core AC subsea cable | Main | Berkeley study finds renewable portfolio standards insufficient to meet 2030 GHG emission targets; new policy required »
PNNL team develops high-capacity nanocomposite anode for Na-ion batteries based on multi-component alloying reactions
13 February 2012
|
|
| Rate capability of the SnSb/C nanocomposite electrode at various current rates from 100 to 1000 mAh g-1. Xiao et al. Click to enlarge. |
Researchers at US Department of Energy (DOE) Pacific Northwest National Laboratory have demonstrated a new tin-antimony (SnSb/C) nanocomposite based on sodium (Na) alloying reactions as an anode for Na-ion battery applications. The electrode achieves an exceptionally high capacity of 544 mAh g-1 (almost doubling that of intercalation carbon materials), good rate capacity and cyclability (80% capacity retention over 50 cycles) for Na-ion storage.
In 2011, the team reported on single crystalline sodium-manganese oxide (Na4Mn9O18) nanowires for sodium-ion battery applications that showed a reversible capacity of 128 mAh g-1 and stable cycling for more than 1,000 cycles in a paper in the journal Advanced Materials. (Earlier post.) A paper on the new nanocomposite has been accepted for publication in the RSC journal Chemical Communications.
Sodium has been proposed as a promising lower-cost alternative to Li-ion rechargeable batteries for grid storage. However, sodium-sulfur batteries currently in use run at temperatures above 300 °C, making them less energy efficient and safe than batteries that run at ambient temperatures. Sodium-ion batteries have been discussed in the literature for some time, and are attractive because they could potentially be less expensive, safer, and more environmentally benign. However, Na ions are significantly larger in radius than Li ions, making it difficult to find a suitable host material to accommodate the Na ions and allow reversible and rapid ion insertion and extraction.
Li alloys have been extensively investigated as high capacity anodes for Li-ion batteries. Analogously, Na can alloy with many metallic elements such as Sn, Sb, germanium (Ge), lead (Pb), and the calculated theoretical specific capacities are 847 (Na15Sn4), 660 (Na3Sb), 1,108 (Na3Ge), and 484 (Na15Pb4) mAh g-1 respectively. Na alloying reactions also have slightly higher thermodynamic potentials than that of Li, making them potentially safer. Still, to date, there have been very limited experimental studies of alloy compounds for reversible Na ion insertion. Here, we provide the first report of high capacity alloy reaction for Na ion insertion based on SnSb/C nanocomposites with a reversible capacity over 500 mAh g-1.
—Xiao et al.
For the study, they prepared SnSb/C nanocomposites with a metal:carbon black (Super P) weight ratio of 7:3. The Sn:Sb ratio was 1:1 by molar ratio. Among the findings of their study:
Initial discharge gives an overall capacity of 742 mAh g-1. The first charge recovers a reversible capacity of 544 mAh g−1, with an initial coulombic efficiency of 75.1%, which quickly improves after a few cycles.
For the metal/C composites, some capacity is derived from the carbon matrix. Pure ball-milled super P can deliver a stable specific capacity of 172 mAh g-1. With 30 wt.% Super P in the composite, the carbon may contribute to about 51.6 mAh g-1 in capacity. Therefore, most of the reversible capacity (about 492.4 mAh g-1) comes from the alloy.
For a 50% SnSb alloy, the theoretical capacity is assumed to be 753 mAh g-1 based on 50% Na15Sn4 (847 mAh g-1) plus 50% Na3Sb (660 mAh g-1). For 70 wt.% active alloy, the theoretical capacity is then 527 mAh g-1. Therefore, the reversible capacity from the active alloy material is about 93.4% of the theoretical capacity—almost two times higher than best results obtained from carbon-based anode materials.
After 50 cycles, the electrode maintains a capacity of 435 mAh g-1. The coulombic efficiency of the electrode is as high as 98.3% for more than 50 cycles, indicating good reaction reversibility.
The electrode delivers a discharge capacity of 433, 337, and 274 mAh g-1 at high charge/discharge rates of 200, 500, and 1000 mA g-1, respectively. When the rate is reset to 100mA g-1 after 50 cycles, the capacity recovers to 419 mAh g-1 and retains 81% of the original capacity, which indicates good tolerance for the rapid Na ion insertion/extraction.
Based on the CV results and charge-discharge behavior, we suggest that the coexisting Sn- and Sb-rich phases likely formed during sequential electrochemical reactions may self-support one another. When one of the phases is deformed, the other phase may retain the stability and maintains good electric contact during the alloying- dealloying processes. The multicomponent alloy reaction represents an important direction for developing high-capacity electrode materials for Na-ion batteries. Optimization of the alloy composition and structure and careful study of the structural change of the different alloy phases during the reactions will lead to further improvement of the electrochemical properties.
—Xiao et al.
Resources
Lifen Xiao, Yuliang Cao, Jie Xiao, Wei Wang, Libor Kovarik, Zimin Nie and Jun Liu (2012) High capacity, reversible alloying reactions in SnSb/C nanocomposites for Na-ion battery applications. Chem. Commun., 2012, Accepted Manuscript doi: 10.1039/C2CC17129E
February 13, 2012 in Batteries, Smart Grid | Permalink | Comments (10) | TrackBack (0)
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef01676247ba78970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference PNNL team develops high-capacity nanocomposite anode for Na-ion batteries based on multi-component alloying reactions :
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Twitter headlines

Hasn't 50 cycle/80% been achieved with Na-ion long ago?
For background: http://gigaom.com/cleantech/25-battery-breakthroughs-for-gadgets-electric-cars-the-grid/
then, time/interest permitting - link through the latest details of each firm.
We should have this EV battery thing whipped.
Posted by: kelly | February 13, 2012 at 11:18 AM
I have been reading about aluminum sulfur batteries worked on in the 1990s, they made good progress and then gave up. Aluminum can give 3 electrons to lithium's one and sulfur can take 2 ions versus two atoms for one ion with other cathodes.
Aluminum would be much more available at lower cost than lithium, sulfur is definitely abundant. Now using carbon nano tubes is not exactly low cost with the sulfur, but maybe that can be improved upon. The point being, there seems to be many ways to make a battery that could do the job.
Posted by: SJC | February 13, 2012 at 12:09 PM
"Last October, a Kolibri-powered Audi A2, converted by DBM Energy GmbH and Lekker Energie with funding from the German economy ministry, traveled from Munich to Berlin, around 375 miles, which the car covered in about seven hours without recharging. Upon arrival, its 115-kWh pack was only around 80 percent depleted, implying a total range of more than 400 miles from a pack weighing just 770 pounds."
http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/03/a-375-mile-battery-range-too-good-to-be-true/
Posted by: SJC | February 13, 2012 at 12:35 PM
Lithium is neither that expensive or rare. The argument that Na is cheaper than lithium is irrelevent when you consider that only about 3% of the materials cost in lithium ion batteries is for the lithium. The cathode materials and seperators are the two most expensive. In this case you go from a relatively cheap carbon anode to one using tin and antimony. Are these cheap? Presumably this was cycled against a sodium counter electrode. They mention the NaMnO material but never say whether that was their cathode. Which is another point, the sodium batteries have always been cathode limited, not anode limited. In addition, if this is for grid applications, then why run at high current. The advantages of the grid apps is that you are not in need of high currents or high energy densities. You need low cost, and so you can run low currents and make things last longer. For grid, calculate cost per electron stored, nothing else. Energy density and current density only matter to the extent that really low density materials would have much more material used and therefore would be more costly. But hey, the experts must know this right?
Posted by: Brotherkenny4 | February 13, 2012 at 02:05 PM
I never said it was expensive nor rare, you are implying an inference that was not made. Most people would probably agree that aluminum is less expensive and more available, that is all. Do not try to make an argument where there is none.
Posted by: SJC | February 13, 2012 at 04:15 PM
Concerning Kolibri-powered:
http://www.zimbio.com/Laptop+Reviews/articles/5Mk4YC1BnW4/Breakthrough+Lithium+ion+Battery+Area
It's claimed to have been tested for years already, so why isn't it for sale to the public.
No more GM/Chevron battery deals.
Posted by: kelly | February 13, 2012 at 10:15 PM
"Kolibri battery short."
That might explain why the battery is not yet ready.
Posted by: TexasDesert | February 13, 2012 at 10:33 PM
Na-ion batteries are just one of a whole spectrum of possibilities beyond lithium I identified in an article published last year (See: http://seekingalpha.com/article/277597-lithium-ion-battery-developments-most-affected-key-companies-and-etfs). Time will tell whether they finally make it into the market.
Posted by: Juan Carlos Zuleta | February 13, 2012 at 11:21 PM
The race for better batteries will pick up speed when electrified vehicles are mass produced in sufficient number (5+ million/year) and when battery manufacturing become a major diversified money making business.
Posted by: HarveyD | February 14, 2012 at 01:18 PM
I see it as more simultaneous, if a batter breakthrough like lithium sulfur or the kolibri battery can get us 400 Wh per liter and per kilogram with less than $200 per kWh then it might just change the whole game.
Posted by: SJC | February 14, 2012 at 05:18 PM