Green Car Congress  
Go to GCC Discussions forum About GCC Contact  RSS Subscribe Twitter headlines

« Cobalt Technologies demonstrates capability of biocatalyst conversion of biomass sugars to n-butanol; confirms 40-60% cost reduction compared to petroleum-derived n-butanol | Main | US DOT to hold public meeting on Vehicle-to-Infrastructure research »

Print this post

New “convection battery” could significantly increase performance of existing as well as new, improved battery chemistries

8 March 2012

Suppes
Schematic of the convection cell. Credit: Prof. Galen Suppes. Click to enlarge.

Researchers at the University of Missouri’s Department of Chemical Engineering (MU) have developed and demonstrated a new type of battery, referred to as the “convection battery” or “convection cell”. The convection cell pumps electrolyte through porous electrodes to decrease diffusion overpotential losses and make the potential more uniform throughout the electrode. Research is being performed under the guidance of Galen J. Suppes, the J.C. Dowell Professor in Chemical Engineering.

In a new paper submitted to AIChE Journal on the work, Dr. Suppes notes that a major difference between the new convection battery and conventional flow batteries (including air batteries) is that a single electrolyte is used in both the anode and cathode in the convection cell. Further, all active materials exist and remain in a solid state in the electrodes. The circulation of the electrolyte allows for the transfer of ionic intermediates between the electrodes to allow for the electrochemical reactions to proceed.

By contrast, the flow battery requires two separate electrolytes because active species are dissolved in the electrolyte(s)—flowing through the separator would mix reactive species outside the desired half-cell scheme.

Suppes and his colleagues initially validated their concept of the convection cell using a zinc-alkaline chemistry. In the paper reporting that work (Suppes et al. 2011), they concluded that:

Flow batteries have a few major advantages over traditional diffusion-based battery designs. For instance, higher power output is possible with the flow (reported to 500 mA/ cm2) of electrolyte when one of the reagents is stored in the electrolyte. For these high-power output batteries, the flow of electrolyte also facilitates heat removal. Elimination or substantial reduction of membrane separators is another advantage of flow batteries.

The flow battery proposed in this work is different than the traditional flow batteries because all reagents and products reside as solids, which are part of the electrodes. Ionic intermediates flow through the electrolyte but do not accumulate. An advantage of having solid reagents is that the activity of the reagents remains nearly constant during use, whereas both the concentration and voltages from soluble reagents will decrease with use. Solid-substrate batteries also tend to have higher energy densities because of a more constant voltage output and the higher molar densities of pure solid reagents vs. solvated reagents.

...This flow battery has the potential to gain higher energy densities than other types of flow batteries and provides an excellent platform for rechargeable lithium batteries that allow use of metallic lithium in the anode.

—Suppes et al. 2011

For small batteries, the team notes, conventional diffusion-based architectures are superior because the cost of the circulating pump alone would be more than the cost of the traditional diffusion-based battery. However, for larger batteries, the savings in separator and cathode intercalation material costs can more than offset the cost of a pump. Typical applications of the new convection battery would be plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and electric grid energy storage, they suggested.

Other advantages of the convection battery could include:

  • Better use of thicker electrodes due to a more-uniform distribution of potential in the electrodes.

  • Reduced separator and current collector materials which results in lower cost and higher energy density batteries.

  • Mitigation of dendrite formation through multiple mechanisms including shear forces from flow which can inhibit single-crystal growth.

  • Elimination of drying of electrodes through replenishing of electrolyte.

  • Easy temperature management by flow of electrolyte through heat exchangers.

  • Ability to routinely drain electrolyte from cells during non-use to increase cell life.

  • Ability to increase electrode separation distance due to decreased concentration gradients across the separator.

  • Ability to implement measures that will better-allow use of metallic lithium.

In the new paper submitted to AIChE Journal, they validated their concept using lithium iron phosphate chemistry. The selected LiFePO4 for study because it is a lithium-ion battery technology widely regarded as having a good combination of high energy density, good cyclability, safety benefits, and reasonable cost.

It is important to recognize that these are only initial, validating studies, the team cautions. Future studies will be needed to increase capacity utilization, identify the best match of materials with the needs of the convection battery, better distinguish between advantages of flow-by versus flow-through separators, and generally optimize performance.

Research on the convection battery, initiated in 2008, has received funding from both the National Science Foundation and the Energy Innovations Small Grant Program of the California Energy Commission. Research results have been published in the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AICHE) Journal and the Journal of Applied Electrochemistry. They were also presented at the AICHE annual meeting in October 2011. Since then, definitive data has been collected that validates increased power output and recharging capabilities.

In the validating studies, the convection battery provided about six times as much power output as an identical, traditional battery without a pump, and a series of use and charge cycles yielded outstanding performance.

One of the most promising aspects of this technology, the team notes, is that it can be used to improve the best available battery chemistries, as well as future breakthroughs in materials and chemistries. This compatibility is with traditional battery chemistries such as the lead-acid battery and the batteries currently used in electric vehicles—the convection battery is not necessarily compatible with “flow battery” or “air battery” chemistries.

Multiple patents have been filed on the convection battery, and it is anticipated that the intellectual property will be preserved to allow major commercial opportunities in the US, estimated to be available by the end 2014.

Professor Suppes was the recipient of the 2006 Presidential Green Chemistry Challenge Award. He is the co-author of the book entitled “Sustainable Nuclear Power”.

Resources

  • Suppes, Galen J.; Bryan D. Sawyer; Michael J. Gordon (2011) High-Energy Density Flow Battery Validation. AIChE Journal 57(7): p. 1961-1967 doi: 10.1002/aic.12390

  • Bryan D Sawyer; Michael J Gordon; Michael G Heidlage; Galen J Suppes (2011) Impact of electrode separator on performance of a zinc/alkaline/manganese dioxide packed-bed electrode flow battery. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 41(5), 543-550 doi: 10.1007/s10800-011-0264-5

March 8, 2012 in Batteries | Permalink | Comments (11) | TrackBack (0)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef0163029da70d970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New “convection battery” could significantly increase performance of existing as well as new, improved battery chemistries:

Comments

No real surprise here.  One of the things done to extend the life of lead-acid batteries is to overcharge them on occasion, bubbling off hydrogen and oxygen which stirs the electrolyte and eliminates stratification.  If the battery is designed with a pump, that is no longer needed.

"..In the validating studies, the convection battery provided about six times as much power output as an identical, traditional battery without a pump, and a series of use and charge cycles yielded outstanding performance."

Between researchers at the University of Missouri’s Department of Chemical Engineering (MU) and A D - it's just hard to know who to believe.

This is a good news to car owners because of this new invention. And because of this new technology for the car batteries it more economical and safer to use that before and no need to worries if you are travel and drive for your adventure.

Give batteries another 10+ years or so and the majority will quickly forget about ICE. Electrons are way ahead of liquid fossil fuels.

The electrolyte, dilute acid, in a standard lead battery has about seven times the volume of the actually used lead compounds, lead-dioxide and lead metal when charged.

As it is now and with the future versions, the lead battery with a range extender will work for most automobile trips. The range extender can be a simple single piston engine generator with rotary Coates Limited valves operating at much higher speeds when higher power is necessary; such a unit could produce 10 kW and weigh 10 kilos.

It is even now economical, compared to gasoline, to make liquid fuel with power at a coal fired generating station, and it is even more economical to produce methanol or DME directly from the coal. Recent news articles about reducing oil and gas production and transportation leaks, are making it more clear that producing liquid fuels from coal might even now be putting more CO2 into the air than producing it from Coal would. Dakota Gasification is selling half of the CO2 it produces to make natural gas from coal, and the could sell all of it with more pipelines to other oil fields where it is placed permanently; the company makes natural gas but they could also make methanol and gasoline. Their new gas fired generating plant is therefore the lowest CO2 producing plant that burns coal(indirectly) in their system. The SO2 that comes from burning coal is made into a necessary fertilizer for maize and other crops and helps produce bio-ethanol.

Ethanol can also be produced by feeding NH3, CO2, CO and Hydrogen from the gasification plant to organisms, and this is cheaper than maize ethanol.

Liquid fuels have high energy density, so the combination of battery and engine-generator are the future of electric automobiles. Hydraulic hybrids may be more cost effective as demonstrated by ARTEMIS. ..HG..

In 10 years we may have 1 million out of more than 200 million cars on U.S. roads BEV. Saying that electrons are "way ahead" of liquid fuels is just talk and anyone that knows the projections knows that as well.

Out of what hole did you pull the "one million bev in 10 years" come from? I, sadly, do not seem to be one of those who "knows the projections" I am, however, one who owns a BEV and uses it every day along with 4 other cars/trucks running on various carbon based fuels with 3 other family members. We fight over who gets to use the LEAF. Total cost per mile including depreciation, maintenance and fuel makes the LEAF a winner. As soon as the word gets around, ICE cars will be like steamers.

"As soon as the word gets around" AND the price comes down to something more affordable.

In 10 years...by 202...or so, many large Chinese and Japanese cities may each have over 1 M electrified vehicles on their streets. Watch what will happen after 2015 with up to 100+ different affordable EVs available. Leasing and /or buying the batteries may be much cheaper than buying liquid fuel. People will soon start to figure it out and buy more electrified vehicles.

Look at Pike and other projections published on this site. LEAF sold 10,000 last year, Volt sold less than 8000 last year, even increasing those sales figures does not put many more than 1 million on U.S. roads by 2020.

So, for the sake of discussion, let us say that there will be 2 million BEVs on the U.S. roads by 2022. This is less than 1% of the more than 200 million cars on the roads. It reduces our oil consumption by less than 1% and in 10 years we will use even more oil with more people, more cars and more miles driven.

This is why electrons are NOT way ahead of liquid fuels for the next decade. This is why we could use CNG/LNG for trucks and synthetic gasoline and diesel from natural gas/biomass/IGCC. I would rather do that than import even more OPEC oil.

Burning fossil fuel for heating and in ICE will both progressively fad away. We have (in our area) already eliminated 95+% of our fossil fuel furnaces over the last 20 years or so and we should be able to do much the same with our ICEVs in the next 20+ years. Four of the local six refineries are already closed. However, NG and SG will probably retain a certain market for another 40+ years, specially for industrial and commercial facilities.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Green Car Congress © 2013 BioAge Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Home | BioAge Group