Lexus reveals second version of LF-LC hybrid sports car concept; Advanced Lexus Hybrid Drive develops 500 hp
Phoenix Drives inverter used in MAN Metropolis series-hybrid concept refuse truck

EC proposes capping use of crop-based biofuels to 5% in meeting target of 10%; ILUC factors included

The European Commission has proposed limiting the use of crop-based biofuels to meet the 10% renewable energy target of the Renewable Energy Directive to 5%. This is to stimulate the development of alternative, second-generation biofuels from non-food feedstock, such as waste or straw, which emit substantially less greenhouse gases than fossil fuels and do not directly interfere with global food production.

Also, for the first time, the estimated global land conversion impacts&mdash Indirect Land Use Change (ILUC) factors—will be considered when assessing the greenhouse gas performance of biofuels. The proposal sets out indirect land-use change (ILUC) factors for different crop groups. Under the new rules, the estimated emissions from ILUC factors are to be included in Member States’ and fuel suppliers’ reporting of greenhouse gas savings under the Renewable Energy Directive and in the Fuel Quality Directive respectively.

For biofuels to help us combat climate change, we must use truly sustainable biofuels. We must invest in biofuels that achieve real emission cuts and do not compete with food. We are of course not closing down first generation biofuels, but we are sending a clear signal that future increases in biofuels must come from advanced biofuels. Everything else will be unsustainable.

—Commissioner for Climate Action Connie Hedegaard

As the market for biofuels has expanded, it has become clear that not all biofuels are the same, in terms of their greenhouse gas impacts from global land use, the EC said. Recent scientific studies have shown that when taking into account indirect land use change—e.g., when biofuel production causes food or feed production to be displaced to non-agricultural land such as forests—some biofuels may actually be adding as much to greenhouse gas emissions as the fossil fuels they replace.

The Commission is therefore proposing to amend the current legislation on biofuels through the Renewable Energy and the Fuel Quality Directives and in particular:

  • To increase the minimum greenhouse gas saving threshold for new installations to 60% in order to improve the efficiency of biofuel production processes as well as discouraging further investments in installations with low greenhouse gas performance;

  • To include indirect land use change (ILUC) factors in the reporting by fuel suppliers and Member States of greenhouse gas savings of biofuels and bioliquids;

  • To limit the amount of food crop-based biofuels and bioliquids that can be counted towards the EU’s 10% target for renewable energy in the transport sector by 2020, to the current consumption level, 5% up to 2020, while keeping the overall renewable energy and carbon intensity reduction targets; and

  • To provide market incentives for biofuels with no or low indirect land use change emissions, and in particular the 2nd and 3rd generation biofuels produced from feedstock that do not create an additional demand for land, including algae, straw, and various types of waste, as they will contribute more towards the 10% renewable energy in transport target of the Renewable Energy Directive.

While the current proposal does not affect the possibility for Member States to provide financial incentives for biofuels, the Commission considers that in the period after 2020 biofuels should only receive financial support if they lead to substantial greenhouse gas savings and are not produced from crops used for food and feed.

The new rules will take effect after the European Parliament and the Council will have adopted the proposal in a co-decision procedure. Member States then have to transpose the provisions into national law within one year.

Background. The 2009 Renewable Energy Directive requires a 10% share of renewable energy in the transport sector by 2020; the Fuel Quality Directive set a target of a 6% greenhouse gas reduction for fuels used in the transport sector in 2020. The contribution from biofuels to these targets is expected to be significant.

To avoid possible negative side-effects, both directives impose sustainability criteria that biofuels and bioliquids need to satisfy in order to be counted towards the targets and receive support.

The biofuels sustainability criteria, which are in force today, prevent the direct conversion of forests and wetlands and areas with a high biodiversity value for biofuel production and require that biofuels must emit a minimum of 35% less greenhouse gases than the fossil fuels they replace. This requirement will increase to 50% in 2017.

However, there is a risk that part of the additional demand for biofuels will be met through an increase in the amount of land devoted to agriculture worldwide, leading to an indirect increase in emissions due to land conversion. Therefore, the Commission was asked to review the impact of indirect land use change (ILUC) on greenhouse gas emissions and propose legislative action for minimizing that impact.




The dilemma of biofuels gets clearer.  One of the big ironies is that land which could (and probably should) be fallowed to improve its fertility and build soil is being used to produce subsidized crops, which then depress prices in the third world.  Farmers no longer able to make a living then troop to the slumbs around major cities, creating bigger markets for the exports of subsidized food.

Even many crop byproducts (straw and stover) can be used as animal feed for ruminants.  There's no particularly good reason to convert these things to fuels.

Nuclear phobia is a big factor in this.  If it was not for this phobia, nuclear heat could be used to convert the cellulose in municipal garbage (its major constituent) into simple sugars and oligomers, which in turn could be fermented to alcohols or methane.  Nuclear heat could distill the alcohols, and bio-filters used to remove the remnant organic matter from the bottoms (including uncaptured alcohols).  The high temperatures of the cellulose-cracking step would destroy all pathogens.  This would give a steady supply of motor fuel without any land-use changes.


(can't believe I fat-fingered "slumbs")


Many, all-electric homes (90+% of total in our region) use over 65 kWh/day of clean hydro electricity. This can be reduced to under 25 kWh/day with simple relatively low cost changes to building codes, high efficiency cold/hot weather (A/C) heat pumps with combined hot water, LED lights, improved efficiency appliances, improved R-7 to R-11 tripled glass for all windows and doors etc.

NB: We went from 65+ kWh/day to under 21 kWh/day with above mentioned solutions. Our electricity bill went down from over $2,000/year to under $600/year while comfort level went up considerably..

The 44+ kWh/day saved would be enough to operate 4 electrified vehicles energy free 24/7 instead of 4 gas guzzlers per family. The impact on liquid fuel consumption would be very significant. Applied nationwide in USA it could reduce the need for bio-fuels and Oil imports to almost zero with no effect on food availability and price.

In other words, most of us currently waste enough energy to operate our future electrified vehicles without adding other sources of energy.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)