Green Car Congress  
Go to GCC Discussions forum About GCC Contact  RSS Subscribe Twitter headlines

« Japanese carmakers partner to help double availability of public EV fast chargers | Main | Toyota, Nissan, Honda and Mitsubishi agree to joint development of charging infrastructure for plug-in vehicles in Japan »

Print this post

Stanford team advances with lithium sulfide batteries; high capacity and stable cycling with PVP binder

29 July 2013

A team from Stanford University and Beihang University has demonstrated stable and high-performance Li2S (lithium sulfide) cathodes by using a poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) binder which exhibits strong affinity with both Li2S and lithium polysulfides. In an open-access paper published in the RSC journal Chemical Science, the researchers reported that a high discharge capacity of 760 mAh g−1 of Li2S (1090 mAh g−1 of S) was achieved at 0.2 C with stable cycling over prolonged 500 charge/discharge cycles. Capacity retention was an “unprecedented” 94% in the first 100 cycles, with 69% retention after 500.

The researchers, led by Professor Yi Cui at Stanford, had earlier reported their development of a simple and scalable approach to utilizing Li2S as the cathode material for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries with high specific energy. (Earlier post.)

...intercalation cathodes used in current lithium-ion batteries possess an inherent theoretical capacity limit of ~300 mAh g-1, which is a major factor limiting the specific energy of such batteries. These inherent theoretical constraints hinder the widespread use of lithium-ion batteries in many emerging applications such as vehicle electrification, thus impelling the pursuit of next-generation cathode materials with much higher specific capacities.

Sulfur is a promising cathode material with a high theoretical capacity of 1673 mAh g-1...However, further progress is hindered by the need for pairing with a lithium metal anode which is prone to dendrite formation and other safety-related challenges.

Compared to sulfur, fully-lithiated Li2S (theoretical capacity 1166 mAh g-1) represents a more attractive cathode material because it enables pairing with high-capacity lithium metal-free anodes (such as silicon or tin), hence obviating dendrite formation and safety concerns associated with metallic lithium. Moreover, the high melting point of Li2S (unlike that of sulfur) imparts greater ease of processing in the synthesis of carbon-based composite cathode materials. Despite the inherent promise, there have only been a handful of reports on Li2S cathodes to date.

—Seh et al.

If paired with Si anodes with 2000 mAh/g capacity, the specific energy of a Li2S-based lithium-ion battery could be 60% higher than the theoretical limit of metal oxide/phosphate counterparts, and three times that of the current prevailing LiCoO2/graphite system.

Although the theoretical specific energy of the Li2S/silicon system (1550 Wh/kg) is only about 60% of that of lithium-sulfur system, practically, significantly more lithium is required in Li/S batteries due to formation of mossy lithium and the low Coulomb efficiency of lithium, the team had noted in their earlier paper. As a result, the practical specific energy of Li2S/ silicon (930 Wh/kg) is close to that of the practical Li/S battery (1000 Wh/kg).

Li2S could also be paired with a lithium-free anode, preventing safety concerns and low Coulomb efficiency of lithium metal in Li/S batteries.

However, as a team from UC Berkeley noted in its recent paper on lithium-sulfide batteries, the insulating nature of sulfur; dissolution and shuttling of lithium polysulfides during cycling; and their high reactivity with the lithium metal anode, together with significant volume change, are currently preventing the use of this promising system in practical applications. (Earlier post.)

Most efforts to improve lithium-sulfide batteries have focused on the active cathode material itself to attempt to improve the overall conductivity and limit polysulfide dissolution. Very little attention has been placed on electrochemically-inactive components such as binders.

Yet recent studies have shown that the use of effective binders can have a profound effect on the structural stability, kinetics and long-term cycling performance of electrode materials including silicon and sulfur. In the case of sulfur cathodes, the effect of different binders on their electrochemical performance has been well-studied,31–33 with the most commonly-used binder being poly-(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF).

Developing an effective binder for Li2S cathodes as opposed to sulfur requires a paradigm shift because Li2S is ionic and highly-polar whereas sulfur is covalent and non-polar in nature. Because of this difference in bonding and chemical nature, binder materials that are known to interact strongly with sulfur particles to act as good dispersion agents might not be effective for Li2S and vice versa.

—Seh et al.

Professor Cui and his colleagues used ab initio simulations to elucidate the interaction between Li2S and lithium polysulfides to guide the rational selection of PVP as a binder. The PVP allows smooth distribution of the lithium ions throughout the cathode and minimizing the loss of polysulfides.

Given the simplicity of our strategy, the appropriate choice of binder can be combined with more elaborate cathode structures such as Li2S–carbon nanocomposites to further mitigate polysulfide dissolution and capacity decay. Insight gained from this work, particularly through ab initio simulations, can be extended to other promising high-capacity electrode materials for the future development of novel binders with precisely-tailored functionalities.

—Seh et al.

Resources

  • Zhi Wei Seh, Qianfan Zhang, Weiyang Li, Guangyuan Zheng, Hongbin Yao and Yi Cui (2013) Stable cycling of lithium sulfide cathodes through strong affinity with a bifunctional binder. Chem. Sci. doi: 10.1039/C3SC51476E

July 29, 2013 in Batteries | Permalink | Comments (7) | TrackBack (0)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef0192ac3e55ca970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Stanford team advances with lithium sulfide batteries; high capacity and stable cycling with PVP binder:

Comments

After 10,000 miles time to replace the lithium battery which is half the cost of a new EV. Great technology!

Longevity will certainly be improved 10+fold by 2020 or so.

The world we have much improved batteries is less than 10 years time.

This may be one of may ways to do it.

HaveyD, Please stop making predictions.

10 years sounds like a safe bet from Harvey.

And EVs will grow by more than 10+ folds in the next 7 to 8 years.

Just as EV's sales have multiplied (many times) in the last 3 years.

Tesla's weekly production will go from 400 to 800+ in the next 18 months.

PHEVs with much smaller (500 cc?) micro range extenders (e-generators) will replace current 2400 cc directly coupled units. The weight reduction together with improved batteries will make much large batteries, with extended e-range possible.

@HealthyBreeze - I don't think he heard you, but thanks for asking.

Here is a more scientific prediction: in a few hundred million years, the sun will begin to expand and boil off the oceans. Any life forms still on the planet will be dead.

Incorrect. By 3258 AD a fusion controller shell will be built around the sun. The shell will be named the Obama-Gore Shell, after the president who funded the initial research as a welfare project and for the man who later claimed credit for inventing the shell.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Green Car Congress © 2013 BioAge Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Home | BioAge Group