Green Car Congress  
Go to GCC Discussions forum About GCC Contact  RSS Subscribe Twitter headlines

« New more powerful Golf R is up to 18% more fuel efficient | Main | Nissan to offer new Cummins V8 turbo diesel in next-gen Titan pickup »

Print this post

Tesla says Model S comes out on top in US-NCAP crash testing with lowest Vehicle Safety Score

21 August 2013

Vss-overview
Formulation of the overall vehicle rating according to US-NCAP based on weighted Relative Risk Scores (RRS). Source: NHTSA. Click to enlarge.

Tesla Motors announced that in recent US-NCAP (New Car Assessment Program) testing, the Model S earned an overall 5-star safety rating from NHTSA as well as 5 stars in each component test. The Model S also earned the lowest combined total Vehicle Safety Score (VSS) achieved by any vehicle that has undergone that testing since 2011: 0.42. In this case, lower is better: VSS is essentially a weighted average risk of personal injury resulting from the different NCAP crash tests.

The NCAP crash testing is used to formulate the 5-star safety rating applied to vehicles by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). While NHTSA does not publish a star rating above 5, Tesla said that safety levels “better than 5 stars” are captured in the VSS data for the vehicles that have been tested. Based on the data, Tesla said, it achieved a combined record of “5.4 stars”. While the Model S is a sedan, it also exceeded the safety score of all SUVs and minivans, according to Tesla.

In response to Tesla’s press release announcing the Model S’ performance, NHTSA provided a statement saying:

The agency’s 5-Star Safety Ratings program is designed to provide consumers with information about the crash protection and rollover safety of new vehicles beyond what is required by Federal standards. One star is the lowest rating; five stars is the highest. More stars equal safer cars. NHTSA does not rate vehicles beyond 5 stars and does not rank or order vehicles within the star ratings.

NHTSA also notes that side crash and rollover rating results (at the star level) can be compared across all classes; however, frontal crash rating results can only be compared to other vehicles in the same class and whose weight is plus or minus 250 pounds (113 kg) of the vehicle being rated, as the frontal crash rating into a fixed barrier represents a crash between two vehicles of the same weight.

US-NCAP. The purpose of the US-NCAP is to provide consumers with comparative vehicle safety information to aid in vehicle purchase decisions. The 5-Star Safety Ratings Program was initiated in 1978 to measure the level of increased safety for vehicle occupants in frontal crashes. Side crash rating results were added with 1997 model year vehicles and rollover assessments with 2001 models.

The most recent update to maintain the relevance and effectiveness of NCAP was in model year 2011. The new 5-Star Safety Ratings include, for the first time, the overall vehicle score and a combination of results from two side-impact crash tests. (In April 2013, NHTSA requested pubic comments on further proposed changes to US-NCAP, including crash avoidance technologies as well as crashworthiness.)

The new US-NCAP star rating system provides consumers with a single, overall Vehicle Safety Score (VSS), rendered as a star rating. The VSS rating is a combination of scores achieved in 3 areas of assessment:

  • Frontal Crash (42%: Driver & Passenger scores evenly split);

  • Side Impact Crashes (33%: MBD driver 40%, MBD passenger 50%, Pole driver 10%); and

  • Rollover Risk – SSF only (25%).

Furthermore, there are now several significant changes to those test protocols, including an additional side-impact “pole test” which is already standard in EURO-NCAP testing. During the pole test, the vehicle is propelled sideways into 25-cm diameter pole. Since the pole is rigid and relatively narrow there is major penetration into the side of the vehicle. This test simulates a side-impact crash into a narrow fixed object like a tree or utility pole.

Each year, NHTSA tests a sample of new vehicles predicted to have high sales volume or vehicles that have been structurally redesigned. For example, in September 2012, NHTSA announced it would rate 54 vehicles for the 2013 model year, including 33 passenger cars, 16 sport utility vehicles, one van, and four pickups. Tested vehicles are purchased from dealerships across the country; the vehicles are not supplied directly to NHTSA by the manufacturer.

Broadly, the process is to use the crash data from the different tests to calculate injury probabilities for the passengers (test dummies) in the different tests. A relative risk score factor (RRS) is calculated as the quotient from combined injury probability and a statistical quantifying parameter.

The RRS values are then used to generate the “star rating”—separated into driver and passenger side. The VSS unites the weighted risk assessments from all the tests.

65044_model-s-five-star-safety-rating
The statistical Relative Risk Score (RSS) of Model S compared with all other vehicles tested since the current NCAP standards went into effect for MY 2011 and following vehicles. Source: Tesla Motors. Click to enlarge.

Model S. To date, 132 MY 2013 models, including the Model S, have been tested, with the data available online. Of all vehicles tested, the Model S earned the lowest VSS, representing the lowest likelihood of injury to occupants. Since NHTSA selects vehicles for testing on the criteria noted above, there are, however, some competitive gaps in the data: no testing for Mercedes-Benz S-Class, Audi A8 or BMW 7-Series, for example.

The MY 2013 vehicle with the next-lowest VSS is the Buick Verano (FWD) with 0.50, and also with a 5-star overall rating.

The Model S has the advantage in the front of not having a large gasoline engine block, thus creating a much longer crumple zone to absorb a high speed impact. This is fundamentally a force over distance problem, the company noted: the longer the crumple zone, the more time there is to slow down occupants at g loads that do not cause injuries.

The Model S motor is only about a foot in diameter and is mounted close to the rear axle, and the front section that would normally contain a gasoline engine is used for a second trunk.

For the side pole intrusion test, considered one of the most difficult to pass, the Model S was the only car in the “good” category among the other top one percent of vehicles tested. Compared to the Volvo S60, which is also 5-star rated in all categories, the Model S preserved 63.5% of driver residual space vs. 7.8% for the Volvo.

Tesla achieved this outcome by nesting multiple deep aluminum extrusions in the side rail of the car that absorb the impact energy (a similar approach was used by the Apollo Lunar Lander) and transfer load to the rest of the vehicle. This causes the pole to be either sheared off or to stop the car before the pole hits an occupant.

The rear crash testing was particularly important, given the optional third row children’s seat. For this, Tesla factory installs a double bumper if the third row seat is ordered. This was needed in order to protect against a highway speed impact in the rear with no permanently disabling injury to the third row occupants. The third row is already the safest location in the car for frontal or side injuries.

The Model S was also substantially better in rollover risk, with an RRSRoll of 0.38; the next closest was the Honda Accord, with an RRSRoll of 0.66. During testing at an independent facility, the Model S refused to turn over via the normal methods and special means were needed to induce the car to roll. The reason for such a good outcome is that the battery pack is mounted below the floor pan, providing a very low center of gravity, which simultaneously ensures exceptional handling and safety.

Of note, during validation of Model S roof crush protection at an independent commercial facility, the testing machine failed at just above 4 g. While the exact number is uncertain due to Model S breaking the testing machine, what this means is that at least four additional fully loaded Model S vehicles could be placed on top of an owner’s car without the roof caving in. This is achieved primarily through a center (B) pillar reinforcement attached via aerospace-grade bolts.

Optimizing. It is possible to “game” the regulatory testing score to some degree, Tesla suggested, by strengthening a car at the exact locations used by the regulatory testing machines. After verifying through internal testing that the Model S would achieve a NHTSA 5-star rating, Tesla took somewhat of the opposite approach than in the gaming scenario it suggested—the company said it analyzed the Model S to determine the weakest points in the car and retested at those locations until the car achieved 5 stars no matter how the test equipment was configured.

The Model S lithium-ion battery did not catch fire at any time before, during or after the NHTSA testing. Tesla noted that no production Tesla lithium-ion battery has ever caught fire in the Model S or Roadster, despite several high speed impacts. While this is statistically unlikely to remain the case long term, the company added, Tesla is unaware of any Model S or Roadster occupant fatalities so far.

Resources

August 21, 2013 in Electric (Battery), Safety | Permalink | Comments (6) | TrackBack (0)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef01901ee5d430970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Tesla says Model S comes out on top in US-NCAP crash testing with lowest Vehicle Safety Score:

Comments

Now if we could only go out and buy one;

http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/06/28/tesla-vs-the-auto-dealers-of-america/

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324049504578541902814606098.html

This car turned out to be the real winner for all those who care about their own (and passengers) safety?

BEVs being inherrently safer than ICEVs, will reduce raod fatalities. Another good reason to phase out ICEVs as quickly as possible?

^Good opportunity to phase in vehicles that can drive themselves as well. In 2-3 years the tech should be "there". Totally worth it,IMO, for the U.S. to spend several hundred billion (if not 1tril+) on "cash for clunkers" program to encourage Americans to cycle into BEVs capable of autonomous operation.

GP..a first step to improve drivers skill and reduce road accidents and fatalities (and reduce insurance cost) would be the introduction of very low cost GPS based plug-in miniature black box to record drivers behavior.

Recorded data is downloaded on a daily basis. Insurance premiums are adjusted (up or down) on a monthly basis.

Where introduced, drivers behavior and skill have improved quickly.

Tesla taxis?

http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/23/portland-taxi-service-to-use-tesla-model-s/

With their new Tesla model E?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Green Car Congress © 2014 BioAge Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Home | BioAge Group