Green Car Congress  
Go to GCC Discussions forum About GCC Contact  RSS Subscribe Twitter headlines

« EnerG2 develops new carbon adsorbent material for on-board natural gas storage | Main | Amyris increases number of São Paulo city buses running on a blend of renewable diesel to 400; trial of 3 on 100% RD »

Print this post

PNNL team develops continuous flow process for rapid production of green crude from algae; licensed for commercialization

18 December 2013

1-s2.0-S2211926413000878-gr8
Process flow for liquid fuels from algae by hydrothermal processing. Elliott et al. Click to enlarge.

Researchers at the US Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Pacific Northwest National Laboratory have created a continuous-flow process that produces useful crude oil less than one hour after receiving harvested algae. The research was reported recently in the journal Algal Research. A biofuels company, Utah-based Genifuel Corp., has licensed the technology and is working with an industrial partner to build a pilot plant using the technology. (Earlier post.)

The system runs at around 350 °C (662 °F) at a pressure of around 3,000 psi (20.7 MPa), and combines hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) and catalytic hydrothermal gasification. HTL converts wet algae slurries into an upgradeable biocrude. Catalytic hydrothermal gasification is applied for HTL byproduct water cleanup and fuel gas production from water soluble organics, allowing the water to be considered for recycle of nutrients to the algae growth ponds. The combined process yields high conversion of algae to liquid hydrocarbon and gas products, along with low levels of organic contamination in the byproduct water.

The products of the PNNL process are:

  • Crude oil, which can be upgraded via catalytic hydrotreating (applied for hydrodeoxygenation, hydrodenitrogenation, and hydrodesulfurization of the biocrude) to form liquid hydrocarbon fuel. In the team’s experiments, generally more than 50% of the algae’s carbon is converted to energy in crude oil—sometimes as much as 70%.

  • Clean water, which can be re-used to grow more algae.

  • Fuel gas, which can be burned to make electricity or cleaned to make natural gas for vehicle fuel in the form of compressed natural gas.

  • Nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium—key nutrients for growing algae.

While algae has long been considered a potential source of biofuel, and several companies have produced algae-based fuels on a research scale, the fuel is projected to be expensive. The PNNL technology harnesses algae’s energy potential efficiently and incorporates a number of methods to reduce the cost of producing algae fuel.

Cost is the big roadblock for algae-based fuel. We believe that the process we’ve created will help make algae biofuels much more economical.

—Douglas Elliott, the laboratory fellow who led the PNNL team’s research

PNNL scientists and engineers simplified the production of crude oil from algae by combining several chemical steps into one continuous process. The most important cost-saving step is that the process works with wet algae. Most current processes require the algae to be dried—a process that takes a lot of energy and is expensive. The new process works with an algae slurry that contains as much as 80 to 90 percent water.

Not having to dry the algae is a big win in this process; that cuts the cost a great deal. Then there are bonuses, like being able to extract usable gas from the water and then recycle the remaining water and nutrients to help grow more algae, which further reduces costs.

—Douglas Elliott

While a few other groups have tested similar processes to create biofuel from wet algae, most of that work is done one batch at a time. The PNNL system runs continuously, processing about 1.5 liters of algae slurry in the research reactor per hour.

The PNNL system also eliminates another step required in today’s most common algae-processing method: the need for complex processing with solvents such as hexane to extract the energy-rich oils from the rest of the algae. Instead, the PNNL team works with the whole algae, subjecting it to very hot water under high pressure to tear apart the substance, converting most of the biomass into liquid and gas fuels.

Elliott has worked on hydrothermal technology for nearly 40 years, applying it to a variety of substances, including wood chips and other substances. Genifuel Corp. has worked closely with Elliott’s team since 2008, licensing the technology and working initially with PNNL through DOE's Technology Assistance Program to assess the technology.

This has really been a fruitful collaboration for both Genifuel and PNNL. The hydrothermal liquefaction process that PNNL developed for biomass makes the conversion of algae to biofuel much more economical. Genifuel has been a partner to improve the technology and make it feasible for use in a commercial system. It’s a formidable challenge, to make a biofuel that is cost-competitive with established petroleum-based fuels. This is a huge step in the right direction.

—James Oyler, president of Genifuel

The recent work is part of DOE’s National Alliance for Advanced Biofuels & Bioproducts, or NAABB. This project was funded with American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds by DOE’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Both PNNL and Genifuel have been partners in the NAABB program.

Resources

  • Douglas C. Elliott, Todd R. Hart, Andrew J. Schmidt, Gary G. Neuenschwander, Leslie J. Rotness, Mariefel V. Olarte, Alan H. Zacher, Karl O. Albrecht, Richard T. Hallen and Johnathan E. Holladay (2013) “Process development for hydrothermal liquefaction of algae feedstocks in a continuous-flow reactor,” Algal Research doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2013.08.005

December 18, 2013 in Algae, Algal Fuels, Bio-hydrocarbons | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4fbe53ef01a3faa5225c970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference PNNL team develops continuous flow process for rapid production of green crude from algae; licensed for commercialization:

Comments

I'll be very impressed when capital flows into actual production facilities.

"The most important cost-saving step is that the process works with wet algae."

This does sound good, a continuous process that recycles the water and nutrients. It also produces methane that can be used for process heat or made into fuels. Most excellent.

This same process could be used for sewage water cleanup, converting the bio-solids to gases and eliminating pathogens, biological oxygen demand and compounds like hormome mimics.

350°C is well within the capabilities of nuclear reactors, allowing the energy inputs to be supplied continuously, carbon-free and without any use of the biomass energy to run the process.

Well E-P, as I see it this could be a game changer for sewage treatment, which field is perplexed by a number of competing technologies.

Methanogenesis is most often raised as an alternative energy tech, but is very cost ineffective with maintenance and physical capital, to produce what is a relatively cheap fuel, Partial methanogenesis plus algae farming with semisolid sludge could produce a lot of the heat to perform HTL.

PNK is a valuable commodity from dwindling potash mines. 90% of phosphorus and similar amounts of K and ureates are produced in urine which can be harvested separately from solids. What remains should eutrophy algae sufficiently to produce algae on a massive scale and harvest the rest of the PNK.

Ammoniates are the reason so many tanks and so much energy is used to aerate sewage. Eliminate the step ( a Dutch process developed in 2010 does), and algae growth can be done in the supernatant while solids settle and inerts are screened, and in a manner to compete with the growth of pathogens.

A process from a co. called Enertech in CA already uses high heat to pressure cook sludge. This denatures it sufficiently to separate water fom solids, and produce a biocoal. The next step could be the biodiesel process herein described.

What will drive the process will be lack of landfill capacity or low costs to take sludge, and the need (or public unwillingness) to recycle sludge as fertilizer, which is about to consume half of all sludge produced in the EU.

Whew! And now you know what I happened to be preoccupied with this holiday season!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Green Car Congress © 2013 BioAge Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Home | BioAge Group