PNNL-led team devises microscopy technique for investigating real Li-ion batteries in real time
Startup commercializing thermo-acoustic Stirling technology for combined heat and power for homes

Report: PM2.5 hits 390 µg/cubic meter in Shanghai, 5x national limit and 15.6x WHO safety guideline

The Shanghai Daily reported that PM2.5 concentrations peaked at 390 µg per cubic meter on Thursday—more than five times the nation’s limit of 75, and 15.6 times the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) safety guideline of 25 µg/m3.

Due to the arrival of pollutants from north, the PM2.5 density soared to 300 micrograms by 7am from the 120 micrograms recorded at 4am, and the figure continued to rise throughout the afternoon.

As for the larger PM10, its concentration kept growing overnight and hit about 500 micrograms at 4pm, triple the nation’s 150 microgram limit and 10 times the density considered safe by WHO of 50 micrograms. The city’s average air quality index over 24 hours reached its peak at 6pm with a reading of 287, indicating heavy pollution, while Qingpu District recorded an AQI of 339, or severely polluted.

Separately, the newspaper reported that Zhang Quan, director of Shanghai’s environment protection bureau, told local legislators it would take roughly 10 years for the city and the whole Yangtze River Delta region to solve the air pollution problem.

Vehicle and factory emissions account for 50% of the city’s pollution, followed by dust from construction sites (10.5%), power stations (7.3%) and straw burning (10%). The other 20% is from other provinces.



With CPP and ICEVs contributing the majority of this type of pollution, China has a difficult choice to make.

Both CPP and ICEVs will have to be phased out before too many people die.

The 120+ NPP planed and 50+% reduction of ICEVs in favor of electrified vehicles could turn the tide around?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)