Ford: boomers leading trend to compact utility vehicles
Brown U, GM researchers calculate optimum design geometries for Si/C core-shell materials for Li-ion anodes

European Parliament and Council reach informal agreement on clean fuels infrastructure

To boost the take-up of alternative fuels in transport, EU countries will have to ensure that enough refueling and recharging stations are available to enable cars, trucks and ships using alternative fuels—such as natural gas and electricity—to move freely on EU roads and waterways, under an informal agreement reached by Council and Parliament negotiators.

The new EU rules will seek to reduce the EU transport sector’s dependence on oil and curb its climate impact. They will require member states to develop the infrastructure needed for alternative fuels. EU countries will have to draw up plans including targets for the number of recharging and refueling stations provided so that electric cars and cars using compressed natural gas (CNG) can circulate freely within EU cities.

National plans and targets should ensure that:

  • electric cars and vehicles running on CNG can move freely in cities and urban areas by the end of 2020;

  • that trucks and other vehicles using liquefied natural gas (LNG) and CNG can move freely along roads in the EU’s TEN-T core network by the end of 2025; and

  • that LNG-powered ships can move between TEN-T network maritime ports by the end of 2025 and between TEN-T network inland waterway ports by the end of 2030.

Member countries that opt to include hydrogen-refueling stations in their national plans will have to ensure that enough of these stations are available to ensure smooth circulation by 2025.

The plans should not add any extra costs to member states’ budgets. However, they could include incentives and policy measures such as for example building permits, parking-lot permits and fuel-station concessions. These plans and common standards for recharging and refueling installations should create stable conditions and investment security needed by the private sector to develop the infrastructure.

The informal agreement still needs to be approved by the Parliament’s Transport Committee and Parliament as a whole in April and then the Council.



This is an excellent move by EU. However, to rely on imported NG from Russia could be very risky.

A better alternative would be for EU to install many more EV quick chargers and H2 stations together with enough Solar and Wind power plants to power them. That way, they could reduce their dependence on Oil and NG from Russia.


The small fraction of wind and solar in Germany is already costing a huge amount, and the cost is driving calls to cut subsidies (which will slash the pace of installation).  Expanding it to satisfy transport energy demand—even WITHOUT the losses of conversion to H2—will be prohibitive.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)