Valero to ferry N. American crude from Montreal terminal to Québec City refinery with two Panamax-class tankers
Nitrogen‐doped coral-like carbon fiber arrays shown to be highly efficient air electrodes for high-performance Li-air batteries

Techno-economic analysis of drop-in biofuels produced from microalgae remnants finds price would range between $5.64 and $6.81/gallon US

Researchers from Iowa State University report on a techno-economic analysis of drop-in hydrocarbon biofuels produced by the catalytic pyrolysis of microalgae remnant—the part of algae left over after lipids extraction—in a paper in the journal Fuel. The study, which compares partial mechanical drying and thermal drying scenarios with subsequent energy flow analyses, found that microalgae remnant biofuel could vary in price between $1.49 and $1.80 per liter ($5.64 and $6.81 per gallon US).

One of the most challenging barriers to this pathway for utilization of microalgae remnant is the high moisture content of harvested microalgae; the feedstock must be dewatered.

The goal of this study is to compare the economics of two catalytic pyrolysis pathways for the production of drop-in biofuels, each pathway employing its own distinct method of feedstock dewatering: thermal drying or partial mechanical dewatering. The study presents chemical process models, capital expense and operating cost estimates, and sensitivity analyses of both scenarios.

Results indicate that thermal drying prior to catalytic pyrolysis (TDCP) incurs capital costs similar to those incurred in partial mechanical dewatering prior to catalytic pyrolysis (MDCP) ($346 million vs. $409 million). TDCP and MDCP yield minimum fuel-selling prices (MFSPs) of $1.80/l and $1.49/l, respectively. Energy analysis shows that TDCP achieves 16.8% energy efficiency and MDCP achieves 26.7% efficiency.

—Thilakaratne et al.

Resources

  • Rajeeva Thilakaratne, Mark M. Wright, Robert C. Brown (2014) “A techno-economic analysis of microalgae remnant catalytic pyrolysis and upgrading to fuels,” Fuel, Volume 128, Pages 104-112, doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.02.077

Comments

Mannstein

A real advance as far as the price increase for motor fuel. These clowns are to be congratulated. Keep up the good work. When this fuel finally hits the market at the consumer will be faced with $10/gal.

kelly

Now, perfect the ability to mass operate and build biofuel facilities. Already, the FULL cost of oil is above $6-8/gallon and charged such in many parts of the world.

The impact of a actual biofuel $7/gal. economic oil ceiling price would be MASSIVE.

Even now, the impact of 100+ eMPG on EV window stickers has an impact magnitudes beyond their few hundred thousand vehicle sales ON ICE vehicles.

The ability to make 3 cylinder engines or electronic fuel injection or turbos or extra gears was around for DECADES, but CAFE remained ~20 mpg or worse.

Only since Obama/EVs has seriously higher mpg, >25 mpg CAFE - with 50 mpg on the way happened.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)