Si-anode company Nexeon commissions new manufacturing facility; >20t per year of product
TDK licenses WiTricity patent portfolio for wireless charging of plug-in vehicles

SOLAR-JET project demonstrates solar-driven thermochemical conversion of CO2 and water to jet fuel

SOLAR-JET concentrated thermochemical reactor. Red arrow indicates ceria reduction (oxygen evolution); blue arrow indicates oxidation (fuel production). Click to enlarge.

The EU-funded SOLAR-JET project has demonstrated the production of aviation kerosene from concentrated sunlight, CO2 captured from air, and water. The process has also the potential to produce any other type of fuel for transport applications, such as diesel, gasoline or pure hydrogen in a more sustainable way.

SOLAR-JET (Solar chemical reactor demonstration and Optimization for Long-term Availability of Renewable JET fuel) uses sunlight in a concentrated solar reactor to convert CO2 and water to syngas (a mixture of hydrogen and CO), which is then processed in a Fischer-Tropsch reactor to aviation kerosene.

The SOLAR-JET partners and advisors (ETH Zürich, Bauhaus Luftfahrt, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), ARTTIC and Shell Global Solutions) are optimizing a two-step solar-driven thermochemical cycle based on ceria redox reactions to produce the syngas, achieving higher solar-to-fuel energy conversion efficiency over current bio and solar fuel processes.

The H2:CO molar ratio of the syngas can be controlled in a range from 0.25 to 2.34 by adjusting the feedstock H2O:CO2 molar ratio from 0.8 to 7.7.

The solar reactor consists of a cavity-receiver containing a porous monolithic ceria cylinder. Concentrated solar radiation enters through a windowed aperture and impinges on the ceria inner walls. Reacting gases flow radially across the porous ceria, while product gases exit the cavity through an axial outlet port.

The solar-to-fuel energy conversion efficiency, defined as the ratio of the calorific value of CO (fuel) produced to the solar radiative energy input through the reactor’s aperture and the energy penalty for using inert gas was 1.73% averaged over the whole cycle. The demonstrated efficiency is roughly four times greater than the next highest reported value to date for a solar-driven device. Additionally, the fuel (CO) yield per cycle was increased by nearly 17 times compared to that obtained with optically thick ceria felt because of deeper penetration and volumetric absorption of high-flux solar irradiation.

The solar reactor technology features enhanced radiative heat transfer and fast reaction kinetics, which are crucial for maximizing the solar-to-fuel energy conversion efficiency.

—Professor Aldo Steinfeld, ETH Zürich.

Although the solar-driven redox cycle for syngas production is still at an early stage of development, the processing of syngas to kerosene is already being deployed by companies, including Shell, on a global scale. This combined approach has the potential to provide a secure, sustainable and scalable supply of renewable aviation fuel and more generally for transport applications, the partners said. Moreover, Fischer-Tropsch derived kerosene is already approved for commercial aviation.

This is potentially a very interesting novel pathway to liquid hydrocarbon fuels using focussed solar power. Although the individual steps of the process have previously been demonstrated at various scales, no attempt had been made previously to integrate the end-to-end system. We look forward to working with the project partners to drive forward research and development in the next phase of the project on such an ambitious emerging technology.

— Professor Hans Geerlings, Shell

The €3.1-million (US$4.3-million), four-year SOLAR-JET project was launched in June 2011 and is receiving financial support (€2.2 million / US$3.0 million) from the European Union within the 7th Framework Programme for a duration of four years. In the next phase of the project, the partners will optimize the solar reactor and assess the techno-economic potential of industrial scale implementation.


  • Furler P., Scheffe J.R., Steinfeld A. (2012) “Syngas production by simultaneous splitting of H2O and CO2 via ceria redox reactions in a high-temperature solar reactor,” Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 5, pp. 6098-6103 doi: 10.1039/c1ee02620h



I said this years ago, if you take CO2 from fossil fuel power plants and use solar hydrogen we can make liquid hydrocarbon fuels for transportation. Create a market for carbon and it pays to store it. Use CO2 twice and you reduce emissions.


Will future solar-fuels and e-fuels replace current fossil-fuels and bio-fuels?

Will they produce less or more total pollution?


1.73% efficiency, and you need cloudless skies to get the required concentration ratios.

I get the feeling that this is not going anywhere anytime soon.


Of course, we already have abundant solar-powered conversion of CO2 and water to fuel --- biomass. Note that I am not a fan of biomass schemes, but which is a more effective use of land mass? I'm guessing genetically-modified fast-growing grasses and processors based on termite cellulose digestion would use land better than a giant field of solar reactors. At least the grasses can form a friendly biome.

Of course, by far the most immediately available power with the least impact on land use, no effluent at all, and the highest capacity factor is available right now. Hint: it rhymes with "fookleear".


Why not just reprocess shyte, and forget about the specialty grasses?


We already produce tons of biomass, transport it from places all over the world to centralized locations for "processing", and then stupidly dump it all into a hole in the ground. This "processed" biomass is called municipal solid waste (MSW) (commonly known as trash or garbage) and instead of dumping into a hole in the ground we should be recycling it and/or turn it into fuel.




You can get better efficiency using concentrated solar to heat an SOEC then produce electricity using multi junction solar cells with a cold mirror beam splitter.


kalendjay and ai vin, I do not disagree. Tapping the energy value in the waste stream is long overdue.

My point was rhetorical and perhaps a little arcane. The problem with so many of these solar reactor solutions is the enormous land use required for large-scale conversion. If grabbing atmospheric CO2 for solar-driven conversion into fuel is your objective, couldn't we at least attempt to make the giant field of collectors plants instead of machines? Like you I'd rather do other stuff first.

Roger Pham

As E-P stated, 1.73% efficiency! And pathetic, since cloudless sun is required. AND, Fischer-Tropsch process subsequently will incur more losses down the line, AND incurr significant more investment costs.

Plants are even less efficient, AND require water which we don't seem to have much around these days.

For now, roof-top solar PV at 20% is still the most practical for day-time charging PEV's at work, or for making H2 at 15% efficiency using solar PV for FCV's use.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)